It can't hurt to add the rule. Then people using RBL checks in exim can turn off the rbl checks in SA and automatically get the benefit of the rule w/out having to compose their own rule. I guess the only possible problem is where people don't turn off SA RBL checking and so messages get a double score because they hit the Exim header rule, and then also fail the RBL tests.
C On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 17:20, Charlie Watts wrote: > Depends. Does Exim actually process all the Received lines, or does it > just test the connecting host? > > Trouble is that SA has some flexibility I think Exim doesn't have - the > ability to tag message differently based on the contents of the DNS reply, > not just the existence of one. > > But indeed - doing it in both places seems silly. > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote: > > > Anyone think this a useful feature? > > Taking what exim returns instead of actually doing the rbl tests? > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- > > > > Envelope-to: daf-rogers@localhost > > Delivery-date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 17:17:32 -0500 > > Subject: Bug#132733: X-RBL-Warning > > Reply-To: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Resent-From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Resent-CC: Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 11:48:04 GMT > > Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > X-Debian-PR-Message: report 132733 > > X-Debian-PR-Package: spamassassin > > X-Debian-PR-Keywords: > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Resent-Sender: Debian BTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=4.0 >tests=FORGED_RCVD_FOUND,SENT_BY_BTS,NO_MX_FOR_FROM version=2.01 > > > > Package: spamassassin > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Hi, > > > > I run spamassassin with "skip_rbl_checks 1" because my Exim already checks > > several RBL lists, and includes warning headers in e-mails. I've noticed > > spamassassin doesn't grok those headers so, here's what should be added: > > > > header RBL_WARNING X-RBL-Warning =~ /./ > > describe RBL_WARNING Includes X-RBL-Warning > > score RBL_WARNING 3 > > > > Arguably this is too much of a guesswork... it could do the same parsing on > > the header as it does in its own internal RBL tests, perhaps? I think Exim > > includes the string the RBL servers return in the header. > > > > > > -- > Charlie Watts > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Frontier Internet, Inc. > http://www.frontier.net/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
