On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 13:35, Daniel Pittman wrote: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, peter green wrote: > >> 2) That *is* an invalid RFC822/2822 date. The specification for the > >> time does NOT allow for the ``local differential'' (+0000) and the > >> timezone (GMT) to be specified simultaneously. Further, the zone > >> specification, whether in > >> +0000 or GMT format, should not be encased in parentheses.
> You are correct, though, that the date per-se isn't wrong, it's the test > for the well-formed header part that's failing, not any parsing of the > date itself. Just FYI, my reading of the RFC says that in fact that Date format is OK, because the (GMT) is just a comment and is ignored. The +0000 which is not in parentheses should in fact get picked up. But as Daniel points out, this is a tangent not directly relevant to the original point. C _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
