On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 01:29:31PM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Yeah, I'd seen this claim of non-compliant headers in a few places that
> seemed OK to me too -- The regex it's checking is pretty nasty though. 
> I'll see if I can figure out what jm was trying to do there and fix it.

Forgive me, I'm just a Newbie to spamassassin and have loosed it on 40000
people on Friday.
Run into the same problem, and it seems that
a) RFC 822 mandated WS after the ":",
b) RFC 2822 doesn't need the WS at all,

so probably the line should be turned into
    } elsif (/^([^\x00-\x1f\x7f-\xff :]+):(.*)$/) {

Jost
-- 
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please help stamp out spam! |
| Postmaster, JAPH, resident answer machine          am RZ der RUB |
| Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate                      |
|                                 William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) |

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to