Just to reassure people -- I firmly believe that autowhitelisting can do a very good job of reducing false positives from frequent non-spammer correspondents. There's just a flaw in the current algorithm which wasn't thought through terribly hard. Once I update the algorithm and re-release AWL, I would stronly suggest giving it another try. At this time though, I would agree that it probably isn't all that useful in a site-wide setup.
C on 2/1/02 5:46 AM, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> How does solve my original problem of false negatives? all that it would >> take would be a few marginally spammy messages < 5 then once the >> threshhold >> is reached then they can Spam away! >> >> -- >> Ed. >> >> > > > I've seen this happen already with some stuff from directclick.com. Now the > Spam has been legitimized thru the AWL. I'm not going to use it any longer. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
