What I would suggest if you're planning on doing this is to get the SA report and insert that into the NDR, with suitable customization of the "report" lines in 10_misc.cf so that legitimate mail can easily be "fixed" by the sender and re-sent. I'd say, as you point out, that it is in fact no worse boncing messages because of an SA score than because of a RBL listing of the sender; in fact it's probably much better. At a threshold of 5, I suspect you'd probably piss off senders and have to spend a reasonable amount of time dealing with them (assuming this is not just your personal mail), a threshold of 10 for bounces would probably have very very few false positives. Higher than 10 is probably unneccessary.
C on 1/31/02 9:31 AM, Nels Lindquist at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Where would you set a benchmark for rejection, or would you even > consider that? Many people are already rejecting mail through the > use of blackhole lists. IMO, SpamAssassin is more accurate than such > systems; many of the open relay based lists especially are prone to > rejecting *some* legitimate mail. I've been considering setting up > my server to mark spam if it's above the usual threshold, but reject > it outright if it's above some higher threshold. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
