I like the idea of the multi-level thing, but instead of "filing" the
message in folders (making SA an MDA?) I think it'd be better implemented by
sticking alternate tags in the X-Spam-Status header such as:

0-5:   X-Spam-Status: No
5-15:  X-Spam-Status: Yes, Maybe
15-30: X-Spam-Status: Yes, Probably
30-:   X-Spam-Status: Yes

The reason for the "Yes" prefix on those last three is backward-compatible.

C

on 1/29/02 6:36 PM, Justin Mason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> 
> "CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" said:
> 
>> Perhaps devise a method for deleting really Spammy messages - say greater
>> than 15.  All of the false positives that I have seen are 10 and under.
>> Keep ones that are under 15 which makes it easier for scanning for legit
>> messages.  What do ya think?
> 
> yep.  I was thinking this is the way to go forward; a good few people have
> suggested including more "grey areas", so what I'm thinking is this:
> 
> - score range 0-5: non-spam.  deliver as normal
> 
> - score range 5-15: could be spam.  maybe, reply with a "reply
> with this password to be whitelisted" mail (this would have to
> be configurable), or file to a "gray" folder for later checking.
> 
> - score range 15-30: more likely to be spam.  file to "probably-spam"
> folder for checking; can be checked less frequently than the "gray"
> folder.
> 
> - score range 30-999: definitely spam. auto-report to Razor, file
> to "definite-spam" folder.
> 
> 
> The first and last items are already in there, with "required_hits" and
> "auto_report_threshold".  It'd just need the other thresholds, and
> possibly a bit of configurability, for example, something like these
> config lines:
> 
> range -5        deliver
> range 5-15      reply_asking_for_pwd
> range 15-30     deliver("probablyspam")
> range 30-       deliver("defspam"), auto_report
> 
> ie. the score range (to replace the existing threshold system), and a
> simple command set which trigger actions.
> 
> Anyway, I'll be away so I wouldn't be implementing this, so this
> mail is really moot unless C+M like the idea ;)
> 
> --j.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to