Are you recomending spamd -d -L -D is ok and then call it with the procmailrc of spamc -f
Brad On 17 Jan 2002, Sidney Markowitz wrote: > On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 10:51, brad wrote: > > SA takes 5-7 seconds per message and can leave > > hundreds of procmail processes running. > > That sounds like a problem right there. I run spamc/spamd with -L option > to skip all network access and it takes a tiny fraction of a second per > message. Razor and the DNS based blacklists are just not accurate enough > to be worth seconds per email message. Perhaps at your volume of mail it > would be worth seeing if you could cache the network based mail filter > databases locally, but otherwise I just would not bother with them. > > I am assuming that you are running spamc/spamd and not simply > spamassassin and that the issue is the network based filters. If you are > not running spamc/spamd then you should expect that you cannot handle a > large volume, as that is the problem that spamd was written to solve. > > -- sidney > > > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
