We don't run spamd here. It's a custom system (actually built using POE). At the moment I don't *think* it's leaking - it was Net::FTP that was leaking like a seive, but I won't be able to put a 100% certainty on that until later today.
(btw: any chance you could post to the list in plain text? It really screws up outlook when you post in HTML, and the "convert to text" option just looks ugly) Matt. -- <:->Get a smart net</:-> > -----Original Message----- >From: Craig Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 16 January 2002 19:16 >To: Matt Sergeant >Cc: Spamassassin-Talk >Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Ready for 2.0 > >I'm not sure I understand -- which process is leaking? The spamd process >that stays alive? It's barely doing anything. Some child process that's >being recycled? I don't get it. Or is each little child leaking a little, >then dying so the OS recoups the memory anyway, but it's just "leaked" a >cumulative 500M+ of memory? > >C > >On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 00:54, Matt Sergeant wrote: > >Still got massive leaks here. Came in this morning and SA had used 510M of >ram. Might not get time to fix it today. > >Matt. > > >This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service >is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus >service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: >http://www.star.net.uk > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
