In terms of byte size, that article isn't even in the top 250. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:LongPages&redirect=no
Pine On Jun 12, 2015 9:31 AM, "Joe Sutherland" <[email protected]> wrote: > Generally the Obama article's used as a baseline since it's enormous. I > don't know if it's the most complex article on Wikipedia but it's gotta be > close. > > As for a more thorough piece of research, I don't personally know what the > procedure is for these sorts of things. > > Joe > > On 12 June 2015 at 17:29, Pine W <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is it necessary to use the Obama example at all? There are others that >> WMF could test independently. Or how about communicating a median >> improvement time for the most popular 100 Wikipedia articles in all >> languages? Waiting a month for test results would be ok, right? >> >> Pine >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > > > -- > *Joe Sutherland* > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: > JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)> > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
