Generally the Obama article's used as a baseline since it's enormous. I don't know if it's the most complex article on Wikipedia but it's gotta be close.
As for a more thorough piece of research, I don't personally know what the procedure is for these sorts of things. Joe On 12 June 2015 at 17:29, Pine W <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it necessary to use the Obama example at all? There are others that WMF > could test independently. Or how about communicating a median improvement > time for the most popular 100 Wikipedia articles in all languages? Waiting > a month for test results would be ok, right? > > Pine > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > > -- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
