On 12/27/08, ss <[email protected]> wrote: > If you found my choice of biased author interesting the last time around, > here > is someting that you will find compelling. There are so many ways in which > you should be able to trash the source and author without bothering to look > at the content.
my intention was not to demand an alternate supporting article. If you notice, the article by arundhati roy elicited a wide ranging response, primarily to refute what she wrote, and to emphasise that the content of her columns is one dimensional and carefully excludes other paths of reasoning -- this is something that is not immediately apparent to a non-indian / foreigner. Clearly things are never black and white, which is why i was confused why that article could be taken at face value when the article by arundhati roy could not, yet in many ways the two articles are similar in that they allege deep seated problems on the state of the two nations.
