> Hi, please consider the following changes: > > There are many classes inherited from the `HandshakeClosure` class, but they > do not follow the same naming convention. In this PR we address this issue, > all names are normalized in the following way: > > `XXXDummyClassNameClosure -> XXXDummyClassNameHandshakeClosure` > > or > > `XXXDummyClassNameHandshake -> XXXDummyClassNameHandshakeClosure` > > or > > `XXXStrangeClassName -> SomewhatSimilarNameHandshakeClosure` > > Tested in GHA and tiers 1 - 3.
Anton Artemov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: 8284016: Reverted closure names in JVMTI ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26014/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26014/files/eeb302df..65b9ecc5 Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=26014&range=02 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=26014&range=01-02 Stats: 76 lines in 7 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 76 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26014.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26014/head:pull/26014 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26014
