On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:18:14 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> What is the intended way of using this? Do you run make with 
>>> LIBPTHREAD=-pthread or do you apply a patch on libraries.m4 for the 
>>> specific way of linking to pthread?
>> 
>> This is in preparation of the upcoming BSD port, which uses `-pthread` 
>> instead of `-pthread`. It was me who suggested that this is done separately 
>> with the existing code, to minimize the patch of the BSD port.
>
> @magicus why can't we just use `-pthread` everywhere? My recollection is that 
> `-pthread` both sets compiler directives needed for pthread programming and 
> links to libpthread, so it seems to be what we should be using. ??

@dholmes-ora Good question. I don't know the answer. I know we used `-pthread` 
exclusively on Solaris, and that we've used `-lpthread` on Linux (but 
apparently not in all cases?). I guess this difference would not have been 
introduced when the Linux port was created from the Solaris port unless it made 
sense. So maybe at that time, GCC did not support `-pthread`. Otoh, that might 
have changed by now.

Regardless, I would still like to see this change. We have generalized almost 
all system libraries to variable (like `$LIBM`, `$LIBDL` etc), and this is the 
last remaining (I think).

We can then check if we can turn `-lpthread` into `-pthread` on Linux as a 
follow up.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23930#issuecomment-2706220845

Reply via email to