On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 01:10:55 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <sspit...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> There is a race between JVMTI NotifyFramePop function and FramePop event >> posting code. >> The fix is to return JVMTI_ERROR_OPAQUE_FRAME if if a FramePop event with >> depth 0 is requested by NotifyFramePop at the time when the target frame is >> in exit epilogue, and MethodExit/FramePop events are being posted for it. >> >> Testing: >> - verified locally with new test (developed by Chris): >> `serviceability/jvmti/events/NotifyFramePopStressTest` >> - TBD: mach5 tiers 1-6 > > Serguei Spitsyn has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > review: addressed comments from Chris: test tweaks, minor function name > correction Chris and Alex, I believe that I've resolved all comments from you. Please, let me know if anything is still missed. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21468#issuecomment-2415594359
