On Fri, 6 Sep 2024 09:31:45 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga <ysuen...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> This PR is successor of #20789 . I got some comments in there, then I needed > to fix in many pooints. And also I have to fix branch name to kick GHA > automatically (#20789 is named with `pr/`, it meets the condition to skip > GHA). Hence I've opened another PR for this JBS issue. > > This PR has been updated with about topics since #20789: > * Use `JavaFrameAnchor` instead of raw frame pointer to unwind frame of > `UpcallStub`. > * The change happens x86 (includes AMD64), aarch64, PPC64, RISC-V 64 only - > s390 is out of scope because SA does not have s390 implementation. > * Only both AMD64 and aarch64 have tested on GHA. > * Refactor testcase to meet expected condition certainly. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: deeb09a6 Author: Yasumasa Suenaga <ysuen...@openjdk.org> URL: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/deeb09a640bf693ea130d1283fc010c22f0cf9db Stats: 447 lines in 12 files changed: 437 ins; 0 del; 10 mod 8339307: jhsdb jstack could not trace FFM upcall frame Reviewed-by: cjplummer, jvernee ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20885
