On Sat, 7 Sep 2024 01:48:39 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga <ysuen...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This PR is successor of #20789 . I got some comments in there, then I needed >> to fix in many pooints. And also I have to fix branch name to kick GHA >> automatically (#20789 is named with `pr/`, it meets the condition to skip >> GHA). Hence I've opened another PR for this JBS issue. >> >> This PR has been updated with about topics since #20789: >> * Use `JavaFrameAnchor` instead of raw frame pointer to unwind frame of >> `UpcallStub`. >> * The change happens x86 (includes AMD64), aarch64, PPC64, RISC-V 64 only - >> s390 is out of scope because SA does not have s390 implementation. >> * Only both AMD64 and aarch64 have tested on GHA. >> * Refactor testcase to meet expected condition certainly. > > Yasumasa Suenaga has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > Remove blank lines Marked as reviewed by cjplummer (Reviewer). ------------- PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20885#pullrequestreview-2287341952
