> This PR is successor of #20789 . I got some comments in there, then I needed > to fix in many pooints. And also I have to fix branch name to kick GHA > automatically (#20789 is named with `pr/`, it meets the condition to skip > GHA). Hence I've opened another PR for this JBS issue. > > This PR has been updated with about topics since #20789: > * Use `JavaFrameAnchor` instead of raw frame pointer to unwind frame of > `UpcallStub`. > * The change happens x86 (includes AMD64), aarch64, PPC64, RISC-V 64 only - > s390 is out of scope because SA does not have s390 implementation. > * Only both AMD64 and aarch64 have tested on GHA. > * Refactor testcase to meet expected condition certainly.
Yasumasa Suenaga has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Remove blank lines ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20885/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20885/files/6cd05f8f..5ff32a44 Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=20885&range=02 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=20885&range=01-02 Stats: 3 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 3 del; 0 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20885.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20885/head:pull/20885 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20885
