On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 18:00:15 GMT, Andrew Haley <a...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > > You could support one build by adding something like > > > -DSUPPORTS_STATIC_LINK for both .so and .a builds for Google, then use > > > that to protect the renaming. > > > > > > Thanks, @coleenp. I think that could work for all different cases. I'll > > reflect that in this PR. > > For longer term we probably still want to find a cleaner solution when the > > static support becomes more popular. > > I think you should be able to use ld and objcopy to merge the .o files and > hide all of the symbols you don't want to export. We also discussed about `objcopy` in https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14808#issuecomment-1631597197 and https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14808#issuecomment-1631611220. My main concern was the portability of `objcopy` approach. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17456#issuecomment-1903359606
