On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 08:58:29 GMT, Andrew Haley <a...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > > > It seems that we may be converging on using hotspot namespace? > > > > > > > > > Based on previous discussions I had been expecting to see a JEP on this > > > after last US summer. I was surprised to see this PR pop up in this form. > > > > > > Ah, I see. Thanks for the clarification. I had an offline conversation with > > @iklam about the namespace and JEP topic during during last August JVM > > Language Summit. Based on the feedback from the conversion, it was not very > > clear if the namespace approach was broadly acceptable. > > Using a default namespace for everything could have bad effects on debugging > and other maintenance tools. it's unlikely to be a low-cost option. Perhaps > it could be restricted to the static linking case, but that further > complicates testing. Thanks. Agreed to both points. It seems to add too much complexities if the namespace usage is restricted to static linking case only. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17456#issuecomment-1901043889
