On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:14:58 GMT, Jiangli Zhou <jian...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Please review this PR with a simple solution for resolving duplicate `Thread` 
> symbol issue. In https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14808 comments, there 
> was an alternative suggestion to redefine the symbol at build time, such as  
> using`-DThread=HotSpotThread`. That would not address issues when symbol were 
> references as string literals. https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14808 also 
> discussed using namespace for hotspot code, which can have multiple 
> benefits/motivations. We could explore further using namespace with more 
> consensus on that approach.
> 
> Contributed by Chuck Rasbold and @jianglizhou.

> Linking failures were observed when statically linking the launcher 
> executable with hotspot and user native code together: 

So the problem is that the user native code defines Thread as well - right? So 
this could keep happening for name after name depending on what native code is 
being linked. 

I second what @theRealAph said! This is really ugly. The way disparate 
libraries just get munged into a single namespace with static linking just 
seems wrong to me.

At a minimum this hack should only be used when doing static linking as Coleen 
suggested. But I'd much prefer a solution that came from the tools doing the 
linking.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17456#issuecomment-1897940456

Reply via email to