On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 22:15:35 GMT, Afshin Zafari <azaf...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> I still approve of this patch as it's better than what we had before. There >>> are a lot of suggested improvements that can be done either in this PR or >>> in a future RFE. `git blame` shows that this hasn't been touched since >>> 2008, so I don't think applying all suggestions now is in any sense >>> critical :-). >> >> Not touched since 2008 suggests to me there might not be a rush to make the >> change as proposed, and instead take >> the (I think small) additional time to do the better thing, e.g. the >> unary-predicate suggestion made by several folks. > > Dear @kimbarrett , @dholmes-ora , @stefank, @rose00 , @jdksjolen, @sspitsyn, > @merykitty, > Thank you all. > The final code is now cleaner and nicer. > @afshin-zafari I'm happy to hear the code is now cleaner and nicer, but > AFAICS this new version of the code has only had a single review. It should > really have been re-reviewed by at least one of the earlier reviewers. Thanks. Oh, really sorry. That's obviously my mistake. Your are right, I should have waited for others. What to do now? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15418#issuecomment-1825277911
