security-dev  

Messages by Thread

• RFR: 8364121: DESKeySpec.isWeak does not check negative offset Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8364121: DESKeySpec.isWeak does not check negative offset Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8364121: DESKeySpec.isWeak does not check negative offset Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8364121: DESKeySpec.isWeak does not check negative offset [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8364121: DESKeySpec.isWeak does not check negative offset [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8364121: DESKeySpec.isWeak does not check negative offset [v2] Shawn Emery
• RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC Pete Bentley
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC [v3] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC [v4] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC [v4] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC [v5] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC [v5] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8379191: SunX509KeyManagerImpl alias chooser methods returns null for EC_EC [v5] Mikhail Yankelevich
• Withdrawn: 8357466: Create test for Ciphers that are using ByteBuffers backed by MemorySegments duke
• Withdrawn: 8362268: NPE thrown from SASL GSSAPI impl when TLS is used with QOP auth-int against Active Directory duke
• Re: RFR: 8377102: cacerts jlink plugin [v2] Sean Mullan
• RFR: 8378267: Test sun/security/util/HexDumpEncoderTests.java fails when unexpected warning appears Mikhail Yankelevich
• Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v9] xinyangwu
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v9] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v9] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v9] Copilot
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v9] Sandhya Viswanathan
• RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v2] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v2] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v3] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v4] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v4] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v4] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v5] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v5] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8378893: X25519 should utilize a larger limb size [v5] Shawn Emery
• Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v8] xinyangwu
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v8] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v9] xinyangwu
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v9] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v9] xinyangwu
• Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v7] xinyangwu
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v7] Marc Chevalier
• Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v6] xinyangwu
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v6] Marc Chevalier
• New JEP Draft: Argon2 Password Hashing Algorithm Artur Barashev
  • New JEP Draft: Argon2 Password Hashing Algorithm Artur Barashev
• Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v5] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v5] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v5] xinyangwu
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v5] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v5] xinyangwu
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v5] xinyangwu
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v5] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v5] xinyangwu
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v5] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v5] xinyangwu
• [External] : Disabled TLS_RSA ecki
  • Re: [External] : Disabled TLS_RSA Sean Mullan
• Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v4] xinyangwu
• Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v3] xinyangwu
• RFR: 8377914: Typos in HKDFParameterSpec.Builder::thenExpand Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8377914: Typos in HKDFParameterSpec.Builder::thenExpand Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8377914: Typos in HKDFParameterSpec.Builder::thenExpand Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8377914: Typos in HKDFParameterSpec.Builder::thenExpand [v2] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8377914: Typos in HKDFParameterSpec.Builder::thenExpand [v2] Hai-May Chao
  • Integrated: 8377914: Typos in HKDFParameterSpec.Builder::thenExpand Bradford Wetmore
• RFR: 8378379: Remove reference to obsolete jdk.net.usePlainSocketImpl property from SSLSocketReset test Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8378379: Remove reference to obsolete jdk.net.usePlainSocketImpl property from SSLSocketReset test Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8378379: Remove reference to obsolete jdk.net.usePlainSocketImpl property from SSLSocketReset test [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8378379: Remove reference to obsolete jdk.net.usePlainSocketImpl property from SSLSocketReset test [v2] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8378379: Remove reference to obsolete jdk.net.usePlainSocketImpl property from SSLSocketReset test [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8378379: Remove reference to obsolete jdk.net.usePlainSocketImpl property from SSLSocketReset test Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8378379: Remove reference to obsolete jdk.net.usePlainSocketImpl property from SSLSocketReset test Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8369917: LMS/HSS RFC 9858 Support Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8369917: LMS/HSS RFC 9858 Support Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8369917: LMS/HSS RFC 9858 Support Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8369917: LMS/HSS RFC 9858 Support [v2] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8369917: LMS/HSS RFC 9858 Support Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8369917: LMS/HSS RFC 9858 Support [v2] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8369917: LMS/HSS RFC 9858 Support [v2] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8369917: LMS/HSS RFC 9858 Support [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8369917: LMS/HSS RFC 9858 Support [v2] Mark Powers
• RFR: 8376300: Avoid more leaks in KeystoreImpl.m because of missing CFRelease calls Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8376300: Avoid more leaks in KeystoreImpl.m because of missing CFRelease calls Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8376300: Avoid more leaks in KeystoreImpl.m because of missing CFRelease calls Matthias Baesken
• RFR: 8377506: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects (Final) Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8377506: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects (Final) Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377506: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects (Final) Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8377506: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects (Final) Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8377506: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects (Final) Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377506: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects (Final) Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8377506: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects (Final) Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377506: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects (Final) Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8377506: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8377506: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8377506: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8377506: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects [v2] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8377506: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8377506: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects [v2] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8377506: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects [v3] Anthony Scarpino
• RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 Ben Perez
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 Shawn M Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v2] Ben Perez
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v2] Shawn M Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v3] Ben Perez
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v3] Shawn M Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v3] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v3] Ben Perez
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v3] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v3] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v3] Ben Perez
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v3] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v4] Ben Perez
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v5] Ben Perez
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v6] Ben Perez
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v6] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v6] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v6] Ben Perez
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v6] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v6] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v6] Ben Perez
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v7] Ben Perez
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v7] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v8] Ben Perez
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v9] Ben Perez
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v9] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v10] Ben Perez
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v10] Anthony Scarpino
• Re: RFR: 8377102: cacerts jlink plugin Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8377102: cacerts jlink plugin Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8377102: cacerts jlink plugin Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377102: cacerts jlink plugin Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8377102: cacerts jlink plugin Alan Bateman
• Re: Request to Integrate Harica.gr (2021) Root Certificate into OpenJDK Sean Mullan
• Integrated: 8044609: javax.net.debug options not working and documented as expected Sean Coffey
• RFR: 8373690: Unexpected Keystore message using jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8373690: Unexpected Keystore message using jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8373690: Unexpected Keystore message using jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8373690: Unexpected Keystore message using jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8373690: Unexpected Keystore message using jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8373690: Unexpected Keystore message using jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8373690: Unexpected Keystore message using jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8373690: Unexpected Keystore message using jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms [v2] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8373690: Unexpected Keystore message using jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8373690: Unexpected Keystore message using jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8373690: Unexpected Keystore message using jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms [v3] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8373690: Unexpected Keystore message using jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms [v3] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8373690: Unexpected Keystore message using jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms [v3] Valerie Peng
  • Integrated: 8373690: Unexpected Keystore message using jdk.crypto.disabledAlgorithms Valerie Peng
• RFR: 8377549: [BACKOUT] Need to keep leading zeros in TlsPremasterSecret of TLS1.3 DHKeyAgreement Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8377549: [BACKOUT] Need to keep leading zeros in TlsPremasterSecret of TLS1.3 DHKeyAgreement Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8377549: [BACKOUT] Need to keep leading zeros in TlsPremasterSecret of TLS1.3 DHKeyAgreement Daniel Jeliński
  • Integrated: 8377549: [BACKOUT] Need to keep leading zeros in TlsPremasterSecret of TLS1.3 DHKeyAgreement Daniel Jeliński
• Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v2] Shawn M Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v2] xinyangwu
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v2] Shawn M Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v2] Shawn M Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v2] xinyangwu
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v2] Shawn M Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v2] Shawn M Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v2] xinyangwu
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v2] xinyangwu
  • Re: RFR: 8376164: Optimize AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding implementation using full-message intrinsic stub and parallel RoundKey addition [v2] Shawn Emery
• RFR: 8377318: Force bad padding exception in TestPKCS5PaddingError.java at all times Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8377318: Force bad padding exception in TestPKCS5PaddingError.java at all times Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8377318: Force bad padding exception in TestPKCS5PaddingError.java at all times Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8377318: Force bad padding exception in TestPKCS5PaddingError.java at all times Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8377318: Force bad padding exception in TestPKCS5PaddingError.java at all times Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8377318: Force bad padding exception in TestPKCS5PaddingError.java at all times Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8377318: Force bad padding exception in TestPKCS5PaddingError.java at all times Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8377318: Force bad padding exception in TestPKCS5PaddingError.java at all times [v2] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8377318: Force bad padding exception in TestPKCS5PaddingError.java at all times [v2] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8377318: Force bad padding exception in TestPKCS5PaddingError.java at all times [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8377318: Force bad padding exception in TestPKCS5PaddingError.java at all times [v2] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Integrated: 8377318: Force bad padding exception in TestPKCS5PaddingError.java at all times Mikhail Yankelevich
• Re: RFR: 8044609: javax.net.debug options not working and documented as expected [v29] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8044609: javax.net.debug options not working and documented as expected [v29] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8044609: javax.net.debug options not working and documented as expected [v29] Sean Coffey
• Discussion and feedback request on PR: Parallel AES/ECB intrinsic for improved throughput 吴新洋
• RFR: 8377315: test/jdk/sun/security/pkcs11/Cipher/TestPKCS5PaddingError.java is failing with "Expected BPE NOT thrown" Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8377315: test/jdk/sun/security/pkcs11/Cipher/TestPKCS5PaddingError.java is failing with "Expected BPE NOT thrown" Valerie Peng
  • Integrated: 8377315: test/jdk/sun/security/pkcs11/Cipher/TestPKCS5PaddingError.java is failing with "Expected BPE NOT thrown" Mikhail Yankelevich
• Re: RFR: 8044609: javax.net.debug options not working and documented as expected [v28] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8044609: javax.net.debug options not working and documented as expected [v28] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8044609: javax.net.debug options not working and documented as expected [v28] Sean Coffey
• RFR: 8373426: Remove ffdhe6144 and ffdhe8192 from default list of TLS named groups Kirill Shirokov

• Earlier messages