security-dev  

Messages by Thread

• [jdk27] RFR: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException Shawn Emery
• [jdk27] RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset Shawn Emery
• [jdk27] RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec Weijun Wang
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec Hai-May Chao
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec Anthony Scarpino
  • [jdk27] Integrated: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec Weijun Wang
• RFR: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Artur Barashev
  • Integrated: 8385978: Test javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/TestEnabledProtocols.java failed: java.security.cert.CertificateException: Unable to initialize, java.io.IOException: Too short Anthony Scarpino
• Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v2] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v2] Shawn Emery
• RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec [v2] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec [v3] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec [v3] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec [v4] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec [v4] Anthony Scarpino
  • Integrated: 8386681: Remove RawKeySpec Weijun Wang
• RFR: 8376599: Update Cipher/PBE/PBEKeyTest.java for non-ASCII characters Matthew Donovan
  • Re: RFR: 8376599: Update Cipher/PBE/PBEKeyTest.java for non-ASCII characters Marcono1234
• [jdk27] RFR: 8386600: Fix comparison checks in DHasKEM Hai-May Chao
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8386600: Fix comparison checks in DHasKEM Sean Mullan
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8386600: Fix comparison checks in DHasKEM Hai-May Chao
  • [jdk27] Integrated: 8386600: Fix comparison checks in DHasKEM Hai-May Chao
• RFR: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException duke
  • Integrated: 8386466: DESedeKeySpec.isParityAdjusted spec permits 8-byte key but RI throws InvalidKeyException Shawn Emery
• RFR: 8386600: Fix comparison checks in DHasKEM Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8386600: Fix comparison checks in DHasKEM Sean Mullan
  • Integrated: 8386600: Fix comparison checks in DHasKEM Hai-May Chao
• RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset duke
  • Re: RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset [v2] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset [v2] duke
  • Integrated: 8386473: DESKeySpec and DESedeKeySpec may throw InvalidKeyException instead of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for Integer.MIN_VALUE offset Shawn Emery
• RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown [v3] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8386509: Avoid creating exceptions if they won't be thrown [v4] Ashay Rane
• RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8385927: JDK 27 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Naoto Sato
• [jdk27] RFR: 8383608: Make BinaryEncodable non-exhaustive Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8383608: Make BinaryEncodable non-exhaustive Sean Mullan
  • [jdk27] Integrated: 8383608: Make BinaryEncodable non-exhaustive Anthony Scarpino
• RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v2] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v2] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v2] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8376748: Emit runtime warnings for JCE algorithms that will be disabled [v3] Hai-May Chao
• RFR: 8383608: Make BinaryEncodable non-exhaustive Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8383608: Make BinaryEncodable non-exhaustive ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8383608: Make BinaryEncodable non-exhaustive Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8383608: Make BinaryEncodable non-exhaustive ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8383608: Make BinaryEncodable non-exhaustive Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8383608: Make BinaryEncodable non-exhaustive ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8383608: Make BinaryEncodable non-exhaustive Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8383608: Make BinaryEncodable non-exhaustive Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8383608: Make BinaryEncodable non-exhaustive Sean Mullan
  • Integrated: 8383608: Make BinaryEncodable non-exhaustive Anthony Scarpino
• RFR: 8386159: Don't enforce setUseClientMode for SunJSSE implementation of SSLEngine Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8386159: Don't enforce setUseClientMode for SunJSSE implementation of SSLEngine Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8386159: Don't enforce setUseClientMode for SunJSSE implementation of SSLEngine Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8386159: Don't enforce setUseClientMode for SunJSSE implementation of SSLEngine Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8386159: Don't enforce setUseClientMode for SunJSSE implementation of SSLEngine [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8386159: Don't enforce setUseClientMode for SunJSSE implementation of SSLEngine [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8386159: Don't enforce setUseClientMode for SunJSSE implementation of SSLEngine [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8386159: Don't enforce setUseClientMode for SunJSSE implementation of SSLEngine [v3] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8386159: Don't enforce setUseClientMode for SunJSSE implementation of SSLEngine [v3] Daniel Jeliński
• RFR: 8386203: Use CRC32C checksum instead of Adler32 for stateless session ticket Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8386203: Use CRC32C checksum instead of Adler32 for stateless session ticket SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8386203: Use CRC32C checksum instead of Adler32 for stateless session ticket Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8386203: Use CRC32C checksum instead of Adler32 for stateless session ticket Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8386203: Use CRC32C checksum instead of Adler32 for stateless session ticket Anthony Scarpino
  • Integrated: 8386203: Use CRC32C checksum instead of Adler32 for stateless session ticket Artur Barashev
• Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8385304: X25519 should utilize aarch64 intrinsics [v2] Shawn Emery
• [External] : JEP 527: wrongly formed sentence Michael Schneider
  • Re: [External] : JEP 527: wrongly formed sentence Jamil Nimeh
• RFR: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent [v3] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent [v2] Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent [v2] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent [v3] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent [v3] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent [v3] Sean Coffey
  • Integrated: 8301626: Capture Named Group information in TLSHandshakeEvent Sean Mullan
• RFR: 8329548: Change KeyUpdate messages from TLS 1.3 Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8329548: Change KeyUpdate messages from TLS 1.3 Jamil Nimeh
  • Integrated: 8329548: Change KeyUpdate messages from TLS 1.3 Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8329548: Change KeyUpdate messages from TLS 1.3 Daniel Jeliński
• Re: RFR: 8382042: Add drill-into and path info to ASN1Formatter [v13] Weijun Wang
• Re: RFR: 8325513: Export method for Cipher [v15] Weijun Wang
• Re: RFR: 8382042: Add drill-into and path info to ASN1Formatter [v12] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8382042: Add drill-into and path info to ASN1Formatter [v12] Weijun Wang
• Re: RFR: 8382042: Add drill-into and path info to ASN1Formatter [v11] Weijun Wang
• RFR: 8374886: CAInterop.java#microsoftrsa2017 test fails as EE certificate does not specify OCSP responder Rajan Halade
  • Re: RFR: 8374886: CAInterop.java#microsoftrsa2017 test fails as EE certificate does not specify OCSP responder Sean Mullan
  • Integrated: 8374886: CAInterop.java#microsoftrsa2017 test fails as EE certificate does not specify OCSP responder Rajan Halade
• RFR: 8385584: CAInterop.java#buypassclass3ca fails with Intermediate Root CA not found in the chain Rajan Halade
  • Re: RFR: 8385584: CAInterop.java#buypassclass3ca fails with Intermediate Root CA not found in the chain Sean Mullan
  • Integrated: 8385584: CAInterop.java#buypassclass3ca fails with Intermediate Root CA not found in the chain Rajan Halade
• RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Bill Huang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Bill Huang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v3] Alan Bateman

• Earlier messages