security-dev  

Messages by Thread

• RFR: 8374886: CAInterop.java#microsoftrsa2017 test fails as EE certificate does not specify OCSP responder Rajan Halade
  • Re: RFR: 8374886: CAInterop.java#microsoftrsa2017 test fails as EE certificate does not specify OCSP responder Sean Mullan
  • Integrated: 8374886: CAInterop.java#microsoftrsa2017 test fails as EE certificate does not specify OCSP responder Rajan Halade
• RFR: 8385584: CAInterop.java#buypassclass3ca fails with Intermediate Root CA not found in the chain Rajan Halade
  • Re: RFR: 8385584: CAInterop.java#buypassclass3ca fails with Intermediate Root CA not found in the chain Sean Mullan
  • Integrated: 8385584: CAInterop.java#buypassclass3ca fails with Intermediate Root CA not found in the chain Rajan Halade
• RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Bill Huang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
• RFR: 8385092: KeyChainStore entry creation time is always now Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8385092: KeyChainStore entry creation time is always now Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8385092: KeyChainStore entry creation time is always now Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8385092: KeyChainStore entry creation time is always now Weijun Wang
  • Integrated: 8385092: KeyChainStore entry creation time is always now Weijun Wang
• [External] : Inquiry: SECOM Trust Systems - Java Root Certificate Program submission and OpenJDK integration process 大野 文彰
• Integrated: 8367326: Refactor PEM API tests requiring PEMRecord usage Mikhail Yankelevich
• RFR: 8384815: SelectOneKeyOutOfMany and SelectOneKeyOutOfMany fail after expired test certificate Rajan Halade
  • Re: RFR: 8384815: SelectOneKeyOutOfMany and PreferredKey fail after expired test certificate SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8384815: SelectOneKeyOutOfMany and PreferredKey fail after expired test certificate SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8384815: SelectOneKeyOutOfMany and PreferredKey fail after expired test certificate SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8384815: SelectOneKeyOutOfMany and PreferredKey fail after expired test certificate [v2] Rajan Halade
  • Re: RFR: 8384815: SelectOneKeyOutOfMany and PreferredKey fail after expired test certificate [v3] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8384815: SelectOneKeyOutOfMany and PreferredKey fail after expired test certificate [v2] Rajan Halade
  • Re: RFR: 8384815: SelectOneKeyOutOfMany and PreferredKey fail after expired test certificate [v2] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8384815: SelectOneKeyOutOfMany and PreferredKey fail after expired test certificate [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8384815: SelectOneKeyOutOfMany and PreferredKey fail after expired test certificate [v3] Rajan Halade
  • Re: RFR: 8384815: SelectOneKeyOutOfMany and PreferredKey fail after expired test certificate [v3] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8384815: SelectOneKeyOutOfMany and PreferredKey fail after expired test certificate [v3] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384815: SelectOneKeyOutOfMany and PreferredKey fail after expired test certificate [v3] SendaoYan
  • Integrated: 8384815: SelectOneKeyOutOfMany and PreferredKey fail after expired test certificate Rajan Halade
• RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v4] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v4] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v6] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] jonghoonpark
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Manuel Hässig
  • Integrated: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
• RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize intrinsics Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize intrinsics [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize intrinsics [v3] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v3] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v3] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v3] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v3] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v3] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v4] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v4] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v4] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v5] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v5] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v6] Shawn Emery
• RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v2] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v3] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v3] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v3] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v4] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v4] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v4] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v4] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v5] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v5] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v5] duke
  • Integrated: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows Ashay Rane
• RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v2] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v2] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v5] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v2] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v2] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v2] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v2] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v2] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v3] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v3] Sandhya Viswanathan

• Earlier messages