security-dev  

Messages by Thread

• Quantum Resistant hybrid key exchange Azeem Jiva
  • Re: Quantum Resistant hybrid key exchange ecki
• RFR: 8358159: empty mode/padding in cipher transformations. Varada M
  • Re: RFR: 8358159: Empty mode/padding in cipher transformations. Sean Mullan
• RFR: 8357821: Revert incorrectly named JavaLangAccess::unchecked* methods Volkan Yazici
• RFR: 8357995: Use "stdin.encoding" for reading System.in with InputStreamReader/Scanner [core] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8357995: Use "stdin.encoding" for reading System.in with InputStreamReader/Scanner [core] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8357995: Use "stdin.encoding" for reading System.in with InputStreamReader/Scanner [core] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8357995: Use "stdin.encoding" for reading System.in with InputStreamReader/Scanner [core] Alan Bateman
• Withdrawn: 8345139: Fix bugs and inconsistencies in the Provider services map duke
• RFR: 8358076: KeyFactory.getInstance("EdDSA").generatePublic(null) throws NPE Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8358076: KeyFactory.getInstance("EdDSA").generatePublic(null) throws NPE Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8358076: KeyFactory.getInstance("EdDSA").generatePublic(null) throws NPE Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8358076: KeyFactory.getInstance("EdDSA").generatePublic(null) throws NPE [v2] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8358076: KeyFactory.getInstance("EdDSA").generatePublic(null) throws NPE [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Integrated: 8358076: KeyFactory.getInstance("EdDSA").generatePublic(null) throws NPE Anthony Scarpino
• RFR: 8350689: Turn on timestamp and thread metadata by default for java.security.debug Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8350689: Turn on timestamp and thread metadata by default for java.security.debug Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8350689: Turn on timestamp and thread metadata by default for java.security.debug Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8350689: Turn on timestamp and thread metadata by default for java.security.debug Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8350689: Turn on timestamp and thread metadata by default for java.security.debug [v2] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8350689: Turn on timestamp and thread metadata by default for java.security.debug [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8350689: Turn on timestamp and thread metadata by default for java.security.debug [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8350689: Turn on timestamp and thread metadata by default for java.security.debug [v2] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8350689: Turn on timestamp and thread metadata by default for java.security.debug [v3] Sean Coffey
• RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v3] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8228773: URLClassLoader constructors should include API note warning that the parent should not be null Jaikiran Pai
• Integrated: 8298420: Implement JEP 470: PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects (Preview) Anthony Scarpino
• RFR: 8357253: Test test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SSLSessionImpl/ResumeClientTLS12withSNI.java writes in src dir Nibedita Jena
  • Re: RFR: 8357253: Test test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SSLSessionImpl/ResumeClientTLS12withSNI.java writes in src dir Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8357253: Test test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SSLSessionImpl/ResumeClientTLS12withSNI.java writes in src dir [v2] Nibedita Jena
  • Re: RFR: 8357253: Test test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SSLSessionImpl/ResumeClientTLS12withSNI.java writes in src dir [v2] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8357253: Test test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SSLSessionImpl/ResumeClientTLS12withSNI.java writes in src dir [v3] Nibedita Jena
  • Re: RFR: 8357253: Test test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SSLSessionImpl/ResumeClientTLS12withSNI.java writes in src dir [v3] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8357253: Test test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SSLSessionImpl/ResumeClientTLS12withSNI.java writes in src dir [v3] duke
  • Integrated: 8357253: Test test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/SSLSessionImpl/ResumeClientTLS12withSNI.java writes in src dir Nibedita Jena
• Re: RFR: 8298420: Implement JEP 470: PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects (Preview) [v24] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8298420: Implement JEP 470: PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects (Preview) [v24] Mark Reinhold
  • Re: RFR: 8298420: Implement JEP 470: PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects (Preview) [v24] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8298420: Implement JEP 470: PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects (Preview) [v24] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8298420: Implement JEP 470: PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects (Preview) [v24] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8298420: Implement JEP 470: PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects (Preview) [v24] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8298420: Implement JEP 470: PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects (Preview) [v24] Jamil Nimeh
• X-Wing KEM Sebastian Stenzel
  • Re: X-Wing KEM Wei-Jun Wang
  • Re: X-Wing KEM Sebastian Stenzel
  • Re: X-Wing KEM Wei-Jun Wang
• Re: RFR: 8298420: PEM API: Implementation (Preview) [v23] Anthony Scarpino
• RFR: 8356997: /etc/krb5.conf parser should not forbid include/includedir directives after sections Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8356997: /etc/krb5.conf parser should not forbid include/includedir directives after sections Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8356997: /etc/krb5.conf parser should not forbid include/includedir directives after sections [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8356997: /etc/krb5.conf parser should not forbid include/includedir directives after sections [v2] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8356997: /etc/krb5.conf parser should not forbid include/includedir directives after sections [v2] Weijun Wang
• RFR: 8349550: Improve SASL random usage Koushik Muthukrishnan Thirupattur
  • Re: RFR: 8349550: Improve SASL random usage [v2] Koushik Muthukrishnan Thirupattur
  • Re: RFR: 8349550: Improve SASL random usage [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8349550: Improve SASL random usage [v3] Koushik Muthukrishnan Thirupattur
  • Re: RFR: 8349550: Improve SASL random usage [v4] Koushik Muthukrishnan Thirupattur
• RFR: 8357592: Update output parsing in test/jdk/sun/security/tools/jarsigner/compatibility/Compatibility.java Matthew Donovan
• RFR: 8357470: src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/Debug.java implement the test for args.toLowerCase Mikhail Yankelevich
• RFR: 8356893: Use "stdin.encoding" for reading System.in with InputStreamReader/Scanner Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8356893: Use "stdin.encoding" for reading System.in with InputStreamReader/Scanner Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8356893: Use "stdin.encoding" for reading System.in with InputStreamReader/Scanner Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8356893: Use "stdin.encoding" for reading System.in with InputStreamReader/Scanner Alan Bateman
  • Withdrawn: 8356893: Use "stdin.encoding" for reading System.in with InputStreamReader/Scanner Volkan Yazici
• RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v7] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v7] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v3] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v4] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v5] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v5] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v5] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v5] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v5] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v6] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v7] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v7] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v7] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v8] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v8] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v9] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v10] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v10] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v10] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v11] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v11] Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() Per Minborg
• Status of TLS 1.3 Hybrid Key Exchange (JDK-8314323) Stian Thorgersen
  • Re: Status of TLS 1.3 Hybrid Key Exchange (JDK-8314323) Sean Mullan
  • Re: Status of TLS 1.3 Hybrid Key Exchange (JDK-8314323) Stian Thorgersen
  • Re: Status of TLS 1.3 Hybrid Key Exchange (JDK-8314323) Sean Mullan
• RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v3] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v4] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v4] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v4] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v5] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v5] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v6] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v8] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v7] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v9] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v9] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v10] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v11] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v11] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v11] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v11] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v11] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v11] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v11] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v11] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v12] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v12] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v13] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v13] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v13] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v13] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v13] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v13] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v13] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v13] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v13] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v14] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v15] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v15] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v15] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v16] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size [v16] Bradford Wetmore
  • Integrated: 8357033: Reduce stateless session ticket size Artur Barashev
• JEP 510: HKDFParameterSpec.expandOnly(byte[] prk) Sebastian Stenzel
  • Re: JEP 510: HKDFParameterSpec.expandOnly(byte[] prk) Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: JEP 510: HKDFParameterSpec.expandOnly(byte[] prk) Wei-Jun Wang
  • Re: JEP 510: HKDFParameterSpec.expandOnly(byte[] prk) Sebastian Stenzel
  • Re: JEP 510: HKDFParameterSpec.expandOnly(byte[] prk) Wei-Jun Wang
• RFR: 8356632: Fix remaining {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types in java.base Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8356632: Fix remaining {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types in java.base Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8356632: Fix remaining {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types in java.base ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8356632: Fix remaining {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types in java.base Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8356632: Fix remaining {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types in java.base Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8356632: Fix remaining {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types in java.base Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8356632: Fix remaining {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types in java.base Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8356632: Fix remaining {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types in java.base Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8356632: Fix remaining {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types in java.base Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8356632: Fix remaining {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types in java.base [v2] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8356632: Fix remaining {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types in java.base [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8356632: Fix remaining {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types in java.base [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8356632: Fix remaining {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types in java.base [v3] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8356632: Fix remaining {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types in java.base [v3] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8356632: Fix remaining {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types in java.base [v3] Nizar Benalla
  • Integrated: 8356632: Fix remaining {@link/@linkplain} tags with refer to private/protected types in java.base Nizar Benalla
• Implementing Destroyable Sebastian Stenzel
  • Re: Implementing Destroyable Sean Mullan
  • Re: Implementing Destroyable Sebastian Stenzel

• Earlier messages