Ian Collins wrote:
Alec Muffett wrote:
As I understand matters, from my notes to design the "perfect" home
NAS server :-)
1) you want to give ZFS entire spindles if at all possible; that will
mean it can enable and utilise the drive's hardware write cache
properly, leading to a performance boos
Ian Collins wrote:
Rob Windsor wrote:
What 8-port-SATA motherboard models are Solaris-friendly? I've hunted
and hunted and have finally resigned myself to getting a "generic"
motherboard with PCIe-x16 and dropping in an Areca PCIe-x8 RAID card
(in JBOD config, of course).
I d
Will Murnane wrote:
On 6/16/07, Rob Windsor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good lord!
That's a $400 mobo and CPUs are $400/ea (give or take a few bucks,
depending on where you shop).
My solution was cheaper and more upgrade-friendly. :)
Remind me again, how much do Areca cards cost
Will Murnane wrote:
On 6/16/07, Rob Windsor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't see those listed in the HCL as either "Supermicro" or "Marvell",
which is why they weren't even a consideration.
They are. They're based on the Marvell 88sx6081, which is
Richard Elling wrote:
> Tim Thomas wrote:
>> The GUI is already in Solaris 10 Update 3 and later.
>>
>> Just point a web browser at https://:6789, login as root and
>> you will see the launch point for the GUI on the console page..the ZFS
>> GUI looks like this..
>
> Try https://localhost:678
http://news.com.com/NetApp+files+patent+suit+against+Sun/2100-1014_3-6206194.html
I'm curious how many of those patent filings cover technologies that
they carried over from Auspex.
While it is legal for them to do so, it is a bit shady to inherit
technology (two paths; employees departing Ausp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From what I gather about the East Texas venue they tend to repeatedly
> dismiss very competent technical testimony (prior art/non-infringement) --
> instead relying more on the lawyer's arguments, lay conjecture and soft
> fact. This seems to be why the venue is s
Tim Cook wrote:
> Won't come cheap, but this mobo comes with 6x pci-x slots... should get the
> job done :)
>
> http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon1333/5000P/X7DBE-X.cfm
Yes, but where do you buy SuperMicro toys?
SuperMicro doesn't sell online, anything "neat" that I've found is
Tim Foster wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 11:39 -0400, Poulos, Joe wrote:
>> Is there a way to automate the destroying of snapshots that are older
>> that x amount of days?
>>
> Yeah, a few people have done stuff like this.
>
> Chris has this:
> http://blogs.sun.com/chrisg/entry/a
John-Paul Drawneek wrote:
> yep.
>
> but it said that the pools were upto date with the system on 3.
>
> zpool upgrade says the system just has version 3
>
> also patch 120272-12 has been pulled which 120011-14 depends on yay
Yeah, the listed reason -- " corrupts the snmpd.conf file causing
Blake wrote:
> I'm looking for a rackmount chassis for an x86 ZFS fileserver I wan to
> build for my organization.
>
> Requirements:
>
> Hot-swap SATA disk support
> Minimum of 4-disk SATA support (would prefer 6+)
> Hot-swap power supply (redundant)
> Some kind of availability for replacement p
There is a "genesis patch" for 01/06 that seems to work well, also.
122640 - sparc
122641 - x86
I'm not sure why this isn't mentioned in the FAQ.
Rob++
Mark Danico wrote:
> Mike,
> Check out the first question of the zfs FAQ:
> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/faq/
>
> How can I get ZFS
Yeah, the only thing wrong with that patch is that it eats
/etc/sma/snmp/snmpd.conf
All is not lost, your original is copied to
/etc/sma/snmp/snmpd.conf.save in the process.
Rob++
Brian H. Nelson wrote:
> Manually installing the obsolete patch 122660-10 has worked fine for me.
> Until sun fix
Eric Haycraft wrote:
> The drives (6 in total) are external (eSATA) ones, so they have their own
> enclosure that I can't open without voiding the warranty... I destroyed one
> enclosure trying out ways to get it to work and learned that there was no way
> to open them up without wrecking the ca
Nathan Dietsch wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am working with a customer on a solution where ZFS looks very
> promising. The solution requires disaster recovery and the chosen
> technology for providing DR of services in this organisation is Veritas
> Cluster Server.
> Has anyone implemented ZFS wi
Al Hopper wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Ross wrote:
>
> reformatted ...
>> Might be off-topic slightly, but why not raid-z2? We're looking at
>> a thumper ourselves and I'd be nervous of data loss with single
>> parity raid (I've had enough close calls with SCSI drives, let alone
>> SATA)
Shawn Ferry wrote:
>> It would be tempting to add the bootadm update-archive to the boot
>> process, as I would rather have it come up half-assed, than not come
>> up at all.
> It is part of the shutdown process, you just need to stop crashing :)
I put a cron entry that does it manually every
KASTURI VENKATA SESHA SASIDHAR wrote:
> Hello,
> I am working on open solaris bugs .. and need to change the code of
> df in the above two folders..
>
> I would like to know why there are two df's with diff options in the
> respective folders..
> /usr/bin/df is different is from /usr/xp
Johan Kooijman wrote:
> Goodmorning all,
>
> can anyone confirm that 3ware raid controllers are indeed not working
> under Solaris/OpenSolaris? I can't seem to find it in the HCL.
>
> We're now using a 3Ware 9550SX as a S-ATA RAID controller. The
> original plan was to disable all it's RAID funct
Tom Buskey wrote:
> Are you using the Supermicro in Solaris or OpenSolaris? Which version?
> 64 bit or 32 bits?
>
> I'm asking because I recently went through a number of SCSI cards that are in
> the HCL as supported, but do not have 64 bit drivers. So they only work in
> 32 bit mode.
Solaris
A Darren Dunham wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:51:03PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>> Can someone please post a summary of any new ZFS features or
>> significant fixes which are in Solaris 10U5?
> I'm guessing it has some changes/fixes applied, but I don't know of any
> significant feature
Peter Tribble wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 5:48 AM, Vincent Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I would hope at least it has that giant FSYNC patch for ZFS already present?
>>
>> We ran into this issue and it nearly killed Solaris here in our Data Center
>> as a product it was such a bad experi
22 matches
Mail list logo
