I will be setting up a NexentaStor Community Edition based ZFS file server. I
will be serving some zvols over iSCSI to some FreeBSD machines to host jails
in.
1) The ZFS box offers a single iSCSI target that exposes all the zvols as
individual disks. When the FreeBSD initiator finds it, i
On Nov 11, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Xin LI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 11/11/10 17:57, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>>
>> I will be setting up a NexentaStor Community Edition based ZFS file
>> server. I will be serving some zv
On Nov 12, 2010, at 5:54 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>
> Why are you sharing iscsi from nexenta to freebsd? Wouldn't it be better
> for nexenta to simply create zfs filesystems, and then share nfs? Much more
> flexible in a lot of ways. Unless your design requirements require limiting
> the
On Nov 15, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Bryan Horstmann-Allen wrote:
> +--
> | On 2010-11-15 10:21:06, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> |
> | Backups.
> |
> | Even if you upgrade your hardware to better stuff... with ECC and so on ...
>
e later for the 1.20.00.15 and there is a
-71010 extension.
Otherwise, file a bug with Areca. They are pretty good about
responding.
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
chad at shire.net
___
zfs-discuss m
them, not from Sun) and they support battery backup.
It is what I am using
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
chad at shire.net
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
zfs-discuss m
nd with the ZIL business to improve performance.
Thanks for any insight on how I might have set this up wrong.
Thanks
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
chad at shire.net
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptogr
ct).
Since those are inherited on the nfs client from the server I updated
the permissions on the nfs server and all is well.
Thanks
Chad
benr.
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
chad at shire.net
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
on a lower end scale. I am using 2
Areca RAID-6 controllers, each with an 8 disk raid plus 1 hot spare
equal to 1.7TB. ZFS is being used to mirror them. Battery backed
with ECC on controller cache of at least 1GB.
I am in the process of building this now.
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Ne
: zpool and zfs"
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
chad at shire.net
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.ope
On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:47 AM, Toby Thain wrote:
On 17-Apr-07, at 8:33 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Rayson,
Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 10:50:41 AM, you wrote:
RH> On 4/17/07, David R. Litwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about asking Microsoft to change Shared Source first??
Let's lea
On Apr 17, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Toby Thain wrote:
On 17-Apr-07, at 12:15 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:47 AM, Toby Thain wrote:
On 17-Apr-07, at 8:33 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
...
I belive that ZFS definitely belongs on a desktop,
Apple (and I
On Jun 7, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Rick Mann wrote:
From Macintouch (http://macintouch.com/#other.2007.06.07):
---
On stage Wednesday in Washington D.C., Sun Microsystems Inc. CEO
Jonathan Schwartz revealed that his company's open-source ZFS file
system will replace Apple's long-used HFS+ in Ma
On Jun 8, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Rich Teer wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, BVK wrote:
File based CDDL license seems like a right choice to a company like
Apple. My only worry is, Apple never works in open, so their
improvements may never get back into the community.
But that can't happen (to files t
On Jun 12, 2007, at 9:37 AM, Andy Lubel wrote:
Yeah this is pretty sad, we had such plans for actually using our
apple
(PPC) hardware in our datacenter for something other than AFP and web
serving.
It also shows how limited apples vision seems to be.
I think you are jumping to conclusions
hanks in advance for any comments or help.
thanks
Chad
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your
On Sep 25, 2006, at 1:15 PM, Mike Kupfer wrote:
"Chad" == Chad Leigh <-- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes:
Chad> On Sep 25, 2006, at 12:18 PM, eric kustarz wrote:
You can also grab a snoop trace to see what packets are not being
responded too?
Cha
On Sep 25, 2006, at 2:49 PM, Mike Kupfer wrote:
"Chad" == Chad Leigh <-- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes:
Chad> There seems to be no packet headers or time stamps or
anything --
Chad> just a lot of binary data. What am I looking for?
Use "
On Sep 25, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Mike Kupfer wrote:
"Chad" == Chad Leigh <-- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes:
Chad> so -t a should show wall clock time
The capture file always records absolute time. So you (just) need to
use "-t a" when you
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
I have set up a Solaris 10 U2 06/06 system that has basic patches
to the latest -19 kernel patch and latest zfs genesis etc as
recommended. I have set up a basic pool (local) and a bunch of sub-
pools (local/mail, local/mail/shire.net, local/mail
On Sep 26, 2006, at 12:24 PM, Mike Kupfer wrote:
"Chad" == Chad Leigh <-- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes:
Chad> snoop does not show me the reply packets going back. What do I
Chad> need to do to go both ways?
It's possible that performanc
On Sep 26, 2006, at 12:26 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 12:24 PM, Mike Kupfer wrote:
"Chad" == Chad Leigh <-- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
writes:
Chad> snoop does not show me the reply packets going back. What do I
Ch
ould LOVE to have a VMS style (sorry, my TOPS-20 usage was very
little so I have no remembrance of it there) file versioning built in
to the system.
"save early, save often" ONLY makes sense with a file versioning
system, or else you lose previous edits if you decide you have
On Oct 5, 2006, at 7:47 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
I find the "unix" conventions of storying a file and file~ or any
of the other myriad billion ways of doing it that each app has
invented to be much more unwieldy.
sorry, "storing" a file, not "
expect certain names...
I am not one to expound on how that would be done or details as I am
not by any means a guru of "low level unix-style things.
But I would dearly like to have a versioning capability.
Best
Chad
cheers
Michael
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Oct 5, 2006,
On Sep 28, 2006, at 1:54 AM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 12:26 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 12:24 PM, Mike Kupfer wrote:
"Chad" == Chad Leigh <-- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
writes:
Chad> sn
file versioning (#1,
#2, maybe #3) is much worse than a true file versioning user
experience. People are oriented to their files, not to snapshots.
And I may not want versioning with all my files (object files etc)
which you would get with the snapshots.
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net
On Oct 6, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
disclaimer: I have not used zfs snapshots a lot as I am still
experimenting with zfs, but they appear to be similar to freebsd
snapshots, with which I am familiar.
The user experience with snapshots, in
ESIGNED with the idea in mind, already have a
user base trained to use and expect it, and virtually all usage was
local (i.e. no network filesharing). None of this is true in the
UNIX/POSIX world.
And does not affects its usefulness.
Chad
-Erik
_
On Oct 6, 2006, at 3:53 PM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:30:20PM -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net
LLC wrote:
On Oct 6, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
OK. So, now we're on to FV. As Nico pointed out, FV is going to
need a new API. Using the VMS conventi
u are editing geometrically more files.
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
chad at shire.net
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
sion (or 2 ago or whatever). I cannot do that in the
current situation.
Chad
-Erik
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
chad at shire.net
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
generate versions.
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
chad at shire.net
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opens
econd RAID-6 will be installed before XMas)
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
chad at shire.net
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolari
.
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
chad at shire.net
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/list
not synching the entire pool on every sync but just the stuff needed
or something like that. I heard it kind of 2nd or 3rd hand so cannot
be to detailed in my description. Can someone here "in the know"
confirm that this is so (or not)?
Thanks
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.
On Nov 22, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Al Hopper wrote:
No problem there! ZFS rocks. NFS/ZFS is a bad combination.
Has anyone tried sharing a ZFS fs using samba or afs or something
else besides nfs? Do we have the same issues?
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting
e are others running production
systems on RAID systems that they trust, but don't realize may have
bugs
(causing data corruption) that have yet to be discovered?
And this is different from any other storage system, how? (ie, JBOD
controllers and disks can also have subtle bugs that corrupt data
On Dec 1, 2006, at 4:34 PM, Dana H. Myers wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Dec 1, 2006, at 9:50 AM, Al Hopper wrote:
Followup: When you say you "fixed the HW", I'm curious as to what
you
found and if this experience with ZFS convinced you that your
trusted
R
On Dec 1, 2006, at 10:17 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Dec 1, 2006, at 4:34 PM, Dana H. Myers wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
And this is different from any other storage system, how? (ie,
JBOD
controllers and disks can also have subtle bugs
On Dec 1, 2006, at 10:42 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
On 1-Dec-06, at 6:36 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Dec 1, 2006, at 4:34 PM, Dana H. Myers wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Dec 1, 2006, at 9:50 AM, Al Hopper wrote:
Followup: When you say you "fixed the HW&
On Dec 2, 2006, at 12:06 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Dec 1, 2006, at 10:17 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
There is not? People buy disk drives and expect them to corrupt
their data? I expect the drives I buy to work fine
on failure
by mounting the file storage from the zfs/nfs array and restarting
the services from the crashed server on the new server...
Cheers
Chad
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
chad at shire.net
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIM
that it basically said the
whole 20GB pool was dead and I seriously doubt all 20GB was corrupted.
Chad
Casper
---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
chad at shire.net
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Dec 2, 2006, at 10:56 AM, Al Hopper wrote:
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Dec 2, 2006, at 6:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While other file systems, when they become corrupt, allow you to
salvage data :-)
They allow you to salvage what you *think* is
On Dec 2, 2006, at 12:29 PM, Jeff Victor wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Dec 2, 2006, at 10:56 AM, Al Hopper wrote:
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Dec 2, 2006, at 6:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While other file systems, when they become
On Dec 2, 2006, at 12:35 PM, Dick Davies wrote:
On 02/12/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 2, 2006, at 10:56 AM, Al Hopper wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>> On Dec 2, 2006, at 6:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wr
47 matches
Mail list logo
