On Jun 12, 2007, at 9:37 AM, Andy Lubel wrote:
Yeah this is pretty sad, we had such plans for actually using our
apple
(PPC) hardware in our datacenter for something other than AFP and web
serving.
It also shows how limited apples vision seems to be.
I think you are jumping to conclusions
For 2 CEO's not to be
on the same page demonstrates that there is something else going on
rather
than just "we chose not to put a future ready file system into our
next OS".
And how its being dismissed by apple is quite upsetting.
I think you are jumping to conclusions.
Jonathon jumped the gun on something.
Chad
I wonder when we will see Johnny-cat and Steve-o in the same room
talking
about it.
On 6/12/07 8:23 AM, "Sunstar Dude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yea, What is the deal with this? I am so bummed :( What the heck
was Sun's CEO
talking about the other day? And why the heck did Apple not include
at least
non-default ZFS support in Leopard? If no ZFS in Leapard, then what
is all the
Apple-induced-hype about? A trapezoidal Dock table? A transparent
menu bar?
Can anyone explain the absence of ZFS in Leopard??? I signed up for
this forum
just to post this.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Andy Lubel
--
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
