;> One minor comment is to identify the replacement drive, like this:
>>
>> # zpool replace mypool2 c3t6d0 c3t7d0
>>
>> Otherwise, zpool will error...
>>
>> cs
>>
>> Bart Smaalders wrote:
>>
>>> Krzys wrote:
>>>
>>>
;
> On 01/12/09 21:12, Krzys wrote:
>> any idea what could cause my system to panic? I get my system rebooted
>> daily at various times. very strange, but its pointing to zfs. I have U6
>> with all latest patches.
>>
>>
>> Jan 12 05:47:12 chrysek unix: [ID
any idea what could cause my system to panic? I get my system rebooted daily at
various times. very strange, but its pointing to zfs. I have U6 with all latest
patches.
Jan 12 05:47:12 chrysek unix: [ID 836849 kern.notice]
Jan 12 05:47:12 chrysek ^Mpanic[cpu1]/thread=30002c8d4e0:
Jan 12 05:47:1
I was wondering, if I have vdev setup and I do present it to another box via
iscsi, is there any way to grow that vdev?
for example when I do this:
zfs create -V 100G mypool6/v1
zfs set shareiscsi=on mypool6/v1
can I then expand 100G pool to lets say 150G?
I do not care about file system on the
hort on one disk at this moment.
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Krzys wrote:
>
> somehow I have issue replacing my disk.
>
> [20:09:29] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /root > zpool status mypooladas
> pool: mypooladas
> state: DEGRADED
> status: One or more devices could not be opened. Suffic
somehow I have issue replacing my disk.
[20:09:29] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /root > zpool status mypooladas
pool: mypooladas
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices could not be opened. Sufficient replicas exist for
the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state.
action: Attach
I was wondering if this ever made to zfs as a fix for bad labels?
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Jeff Bonwick wrote:
> Yes, I think that would be useful. Something like 'zpool revive'
> or 'zpool undead'. It would not be completely general-purpose --
> in a pool with multiple mirror devices, it could only
I migrated my root from UFS to zfs file system, all was working great. Then I
did mirror my disk, was unable to boot from second disk in my mirror so I did
issue command:
installboot -F zfs /usr/platform/`uname -i`/lib/fs/zfs/bootblk
/dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0
and now I cannot boot from either disk.
Great, thank you.
Chris
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Nathan Kroenert wrote:
> A quick google shows that it's not so much about the mirror, but the BE...
>
> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/boot/zfsbootFAQ/
>
> Might help?
>
> Nathan.
>
> On 7/11/08 02:39 PM,
What am I doing wrong? I have sparc V210 and I am having difficulty with boot
-L, I was under the impression that boot -L will give me options to which zfs
mirror I could boot my root disk?
Anyway but even not that, I am seeing some strange behavior anyway... After
trying boot -L I am unabl et
READ WRITE CKSUM
testroot ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t0d0s1 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
#
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Krzys wrote:
>
> Cur
Currently I have the following:
# zpool status
pool: rootpool
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
rootpoolONLINE 0 0 0
c1t1d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
#
I woul
WHen property value copies is set to value greater than 1 how does it work?
Will
it store second copy of data on different disk? or does it store it on the same
disk? Also when this setting is changed at some point on file system, will it
make copies of existing data or just new data thats bein
ind of memory corruption.
>
> Could I see the upgrade logs, that got you to u6
> ie
> /var/sadm/system/logs/upgrade_log
> for the u6 env.
> What kind of upgrade did you do, liveupgrade, text based etc?
>
> Enda
>
> On 11/06/08 15:41, Krzys wrote:
>> Seems li
t; lines before the first SIGBUS
>
>
> Enda
>
> On 11/06/08 01:25, Krzys wrote:
>> THis is so bizare, I am unable to pass this problem. I though I had not
>> enough space on my hard drive (new one) so I replaced it with 72gb drive,
>> but still getting that bus
what makes me wonder is why I am not even able to see anything under boot -L ?
and it is just not seeing this disk as a boot device? so strange.
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Krzys wrote:
> THis is so bizare, I am unable to pass this problem. I though I had not enough
> space on my hard drive (n
think we need to see the coredump/truss at this point to get an idea of
> where things went wrong.
> Enda
>
> On 11/05/08 15:38, Krzys wrote:
>> I did upgrade my U5 to U6 from DVD, went trough the upgrade process.
>> my file system is setup as follow:
>> [10:11:54]
Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Enda O'Connor wrote:
> Hi Krzys
> Also some info on the actual system
> ie what was it upgraded to u6 from and how.
> and an idea of how the filesystems are laid out, ie is usr seperate from /
> and so on ( maybe a df -k ). Don't appear to have any zo
a say truss -fae -o /tmp/truss.out lucreate -c ufsBE
> -n zfsBE -p rootpool
>
> might give an indication, look for SIGBUS in the truss log
>
> NOTE, that you might want to reset the coreadm and ulimit for coredumps after
> this, in order to not risk filling the system with c
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Enda O'Connor wrote:
> On 11/05/08 13:02, Krzys wrote:
>> I am not sure what I did wrong but I did follow up all the steps to get my
>> system moved from ufs to zfs and not I am unable to boot it... can anyone
>> suggest what I could do to fix
Sorry its Solaris 10 U6, not Nevada. I just upgraded to U6 and was hoping I
could take advantage of the zfs boot mirroring.
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Enda O'Connor wrote:
> On 11/05/08 13:02, Krzys wrote:
>> I am not sure what I did wrong but I did follow up all the steps to get my
&
started it up and it
did boot without any problems to original disk, I just had to do hard reset on
the box for some reason.
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Tomas Ögren wrote:
On 05 November, 2008 - Krzys sent me these 18K bytes:
I am not sure what I did wrong but I did follow up all the steps to get my
I am not sure what I did wrong but I did follow up all the steps to get my
system moved from ufs to zfs and not I am unable to boot it... can anyone
suggest what I could do to fix it?
here are all my steps:
[00:26:38] @adas: /root > zpool create rootpool c1t1d0s0
[00:26:57] @adas: /root > lucr
compression is not supported for rootpool?
# zpool create rootpool c1t1d0s0
# zfs set compression=gzip-9 rootpool
# lucreate -c ufsBE -n zfsBE -p rootpool
Analyzing system configuration.
ERROR: ZFS pool does not support boot environments
#
why? are there any plans to have compression on that dis
I did upgrade my Solaris and wanted to move from ufs to zfs, I did read about
it
a little but I am not sure about all the steps...
Anyway I do understand that I cannot use whole disk as zpool, so I cannot use
c1t1d0 but I do have to use c1t1d0s0 instead is that correct?
also all documents tha
I was hoping that in U5 at least ZFS version 5 would be included but it was
not,
do you think that will be in U6?
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Robin Guo wrote:
> Hi, Paul
>
> The most feature and bugfix so far towards Navada 87 (or 88? ) will
> backport into s10u6.
> It's about the same (I mean from o
I just upgraded to Sol 10 U5 and I was hoping that gzip compression will be
there, but when I do upgrade it only does show v4
[10:05:36] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /export/home > zpool upgrade
This system is currently running ZFS version 4.
Do you know when Version 5 will be included in Solaris 10? are
Because this system was in production I had to fairly quickly recover, so I was
unable to play much more with it we had to destroy it and recreate new pool and
then recover data from tapes.
Its a mistery as to why in the middle of a night it rebooted, we could not
figure this out and why pool h
I have a problem on one of my systems with zfs. I used to have zpool created
with 3 luns on SAN. I did not have to put any raid or anything on it since it
was already using raid on SAN. Anyway server rebooted and I cannot zee my
pools.
When I do try to import it it does fail. I am using EMC
It would be nice to be able to mount zfs file system by its mountpoit also and
not just by the pool... For example I have the following:
mypool5 257G 199G 24.5K /mypool5
mypool5/d5 257G 199G 257G /d/d5
my need and then
replace
the temporary disk with this new repartitioned disk... I thought there might be
easier way to do it...
Thanks for help.
Chris
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Mark J Musante wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Krzys wrote:
>>
>> everything is great but I've made a
hello folks, I am running Solaris 10 U3 and I have small problem that I dont
know how to fix...
I had a pool of two drives:
bash-3.00# zpool status
pool: mypool
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
mypoolONLINE
Hello all, sorry if somebody already asked this or not. I was playing today
with
iSCSI and I was able to create zpool and then via iSCSI I can see it on two
other hosts. I was courious if I could use zfs to have it shared on those two
hosts but aparently I was unable to do it for obvious reason
Hello everyone, I am slowly running out of space in my zpool.. so I wanted to
replace my zpool with a different zpool..
my current zpool is
> zpool list
NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
mypool 278G263G 14.7G94% ONLINE -
> zp
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Will Murnane wrote:
On 6/1/07, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
bash-3.00# zpool list
NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
mypool 68G 53.1G 14.9G78% ONLINE -
mypool2 123M 83.5K123M
s one and lets see how that will work.
thanks so much for help.
Chris
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Will Murnane wrote:
On 6/1/07, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
bash-3.00# zpool list
NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
mypool 68G 53.1
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Will Murnane wrote:
On 5/31/07, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so I do run replace command and I get and error:
bash-3.00# zpool replace mypool c1t2d0 emcpower0a
cannot replace c1t2d0 with emcpower0a: device is too small
Try "zpool attach mypool e
, Will Murnane wrote:
On 5/31/07, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so I do run replace command and I get and error:
bash-3.00# zpool replace mypool c1t2d0 emcpower0a
cannot replace c1t2d0 with emcpower0a: device is too small
Try "zpool attach mypool emcpower0a"; see
http://docs.sun.
have.
Regards,
Chris
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Will Murnane wrote:
On 5/31/07, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so I do run replace command and I get and error:
bash-3.00# zpool replace mypool c1t2d0 emcpower0a
cannot replace c1t2d0 with emcpower0a: device is too small
Try "zpool at
mypool c1t2d0 emcpower0a
cannot replace c1t2d0 with emcpower0a: device is too small
Any idea what I am doing wrong? Why it thinks that emcpower0a is too small?
Regards,
Chris
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Richard Elling wrote:
Krzys wrote:
Sorry to bother you but something is not clear to me
, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello folks, I have a question. Currently I have zfs pool (mirror) on two
internal disks... I wanted to connect that server to SAN, then add more
storage
to this pool (double the space) then start using it. Then what I wanted to
do is
just take out the internal
Perfect, i will try to play with that...
Regards,
Chris
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Cyril Plisko wrote:
On 5/29/07, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello folks, I have a question. Currently I have zfs pool (mirror) on two
internal disks... I wanted to connect that server to SAN, then ad
Hello folks, I have a question. Currently I have zfs pool (mirror) on two
internal disks... I wanted to connect that server to SAN, then add more storage
to this pool (double the space) then start using it. Then what I wanted to do is
just take out the internal disks out of that pool and use SAN
Hey, that's nothing, I had one zfs file system, then I cloned it, so I
thought that I had two separate file systems. then I was making snaps
of both of them. Then later on I decided I did not need original file
system with its snaps. So I did recursively remove it, all of a sudden
I got a message
-F option will work but its few months away
from what I understand... and I would like to just do zfs send/receive now and
keep updating it monthly or even daily.
Regards,
Chris
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Constantin Gonzalez wrote:
Hi,
Krzys wrote:
Ok, so -F option is not in U3, is there any
hello everyone, I have strange issue and I am not sure why is this happening.
syncing file systems... done
rebooting...
SC Alert: Host System has Reset
Probing system devices
Probing memory
Probing I/O buses
Sun Fire V240, No Keyboard
Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
meanwhile I am waiting for -F?
Thank you.
Chris
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Nicholas Lee wrote:
On 4/17/07, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
and when I did try to run that last command I got the following error:
[16:26:00] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /root > zfs send -i mypool/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mypo
Ah, perfect then... Thank you so much for letting me know...
Regards,
Chris
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Krzys,
Sunday, April 15, 2007, 4:53:43 AM, you wrote:
K> Strange thing, I did try to do zfs send/receive using zfs.
K> On the from host I did the followin
ption. This option is in current Solaris community
release, build 48.
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-2271/6mhupg6f1?a=view#gdsup
Otherwise, you'll have to wait until an upcoming Solaris 10 release.
Cindy
Krzys wrote:
[18:19:00] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /root > zfs send -i mypool/[EM
k unless I am doing it incorectly.
Chris
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Nicholas Lee wrote:
On 4/17/07, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
and when I did try to run that last command I got the following error:
[16:26:00] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /root > zfs send -i mypool/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mypool/[
ok, here is what I have:
[17:53:35] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /root > zpool status -v
pool: mypool
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
mypool ONLINE 0 0 0
mirrorONLINE 0 0 0
c1t
Hello folks, I have a question and a small problem... I did try to replicate my
zfs with all the snaps, so I did run few commands:
time zfs send mypool/[EMAIL PROTECTED] | zfs receive mypool2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
real6h35m12.34s
user0m0.00s
sys 29m32.28s
zfs send -i mypool/[EMAIL PR
Strange thing, I did try to do zfs send/receive using zfs.
On the from host I did the following:
bash-3.00# zfs send mypool/zones/[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ssh 10.0.2.79 zfs receive
mypool/zones/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Password:
^CKilled by signal 2.
1 or 2 minutes later I did break this command and I
Apr 2007, Joseph Mocker wrote:
Krzys wrote:
Is there a way to mount file system as read/write and be able to remove
those big files that I dont need there?
My understanding is that shapshots are read/only by design, so I don't think
you are going to be able to remove files from them.
Hello folks, I have strange and unusual request...
I have two 300gig drives mirrored:
[11:33:22] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /d/d2 > zpool status
pool: mypool
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
mypool ONLINE 0 0 0
r 2007, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Krzys,
Wednesday, March 28, 2007, 10:58:40 PM, you wrote:
K> Hello folks, I have a small problem, originally I had this setup:
K> [16:39:40] @zglobix1: /root > zpool status -x
K>pool: mypool
K> state: DEGRADED
K> status: One or mor
Hello folks, I have a small problem, originally I had this setup:
[16:39:40] @zglobix1: /root > zpool status -x
pool: mypool
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices could not be opened. Sufficient replicas exist for
the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state.
action: Att
I guess I need to upgrade this system then... thanks for info...
Chris
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, James C. McPherson wrote:
Krzys wrote:
I have Solaris 10 U2 with all the latest patches that started to crash
recently on regular basis... so I started to dig and see what is causing it
and here
I have Solaris 10 U2 with all the latest patches that started to crash recently
on regular basis... so I started to dig and see what is causing it and here is
what I found out:
panic[cpu1]/thread=2a1009a7cc0: really out of space
02a1009a6d70 zfs:zio_write_allocate_gang_members+33c (60017
.
-- richard
Krzys wrote:
Ok, so here is an update
I did restart my sysyte, I power it off and power it on. Here is screen
capture of my boot. I certainly do have some hard drive issues and will
need to take a look at them... But I got my disk back visible to the
system and zfs is doing resilvering
2867330718.00MB 286749454
format> q
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Krzys wrote:
ok, two weeks ago I did notice one of my disk in zpool got problems.
I was getting "Corrupt label; wrong magic number" messages, then when I
looked in format it did not see that disk...
Chris
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Al Hopper wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Krzys wrote:
Thanks, ah another wird thing is that when I run format on that frive I get
a coredump :(
... snip
Try zeroing out the disk label with something like:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rdsk/c?t?d?p0 bs=1024k
0)
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Torrey McMahon wrote:
Krzys wrote:
Thanks, ah another wird thing is that when I run format on that frive I
get a coredump :(
Run pstack /path/to/core and send the output.
!DSPAM:122,45759fd826586021468!
___
zfs-di
just have another bad drive and want to try
replacing it again. If that does not work you, you may have another problem
such as a bad backplane or a bad SCSI cable assuming the drive is an
external drive. Hope that helps.
On 12/5/06, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ok, two weeks ago I did
ok, two weeks ago I did notice one of my disk in zpool got problems.
I was getting "Corrupt label; wrong magic number" messages, then when I looked
in format it did not see that disk... (last disk) I had that setup running for
few months now and all of the sudden last disk failed. So I ordered
I am having no luck replacing my drive as well. few days ago I replaced my drive
and its completly messed up now.
pool: mypool2
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered. The pool will
continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
action: Wait fo
this:
# zpool replace mypool2 c3t6d0 c3t7d0
Otherwise, zpool will error...
cs
Bart Smaalders wrote:
Krzys wrote:
my drive did go bad on me, how do I replace it? I am sunning solaris 10
U2 (by the way, I thought U3 would be out in November, will it be out
soon? does anyone know?
[11:35
c3t6d0 c3t7d0
Otherwise, zpool will error...
cs
Bart Smaalders wrote:
Krzys wrote:
my drive did go bad on me, how do I replace it? I am sunning solaris 10 U2
(by the way, I thought U3 would be out in November, will it be out soon?
does anyone know?
[11:35:14] server11: /export/home/me
Great, thank you, it certainly helped, I did not want to loose data on that disk
therefore wanted to be sure than sorry
thanks for help.
Chris
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Bart Smaalders wrote:
Krzys wrote:
my drive did go bad on me, how do I replace it? I am sunning solaris 10 U2
(by the
my drive did go bad on me, how do I replace it? I am sunning solaris 10 U2 (by
the way, I thought U3 would be out in November, will it be out soon? does anyone
know?
[11:35:14] server11: /export/home/me > zpool status -x
pool: mypool2
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices could not
Awesome, thanks for your help, will there be any way to convert raidz to
raidz2?
Thanks again for help/
Chris
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Krzys,
Sunday, October 22, 2006, 8:42:06 PM, you wrote:
K> I have solaris 10 U2 and I have raidz partition setup on 5 disks
yeah disks need to be identical but why do you need to do "prtvtoc and fmthard
to duplicate the disk label (before the dd)", I thought that dd would take care
of all of that... whenever I used dd I used it on slice 2 and I never had to do
prtvtoc and fmthard... Juts make sure disks are identical
I have solaris 10 U2 and I have raidz partition setup on 5 disks, I just added a
new disk and was wondering, can I add another disk to raidz? I was able to add
it to a pool but I do not think it added it to zpool.
[13:38:41] /root > zpool status -v mypool2
pool: mypool2
state: ONLINE
scru
Great, thanks :)
Chris
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
Krzys wrote:
Hello all,
Is there any way to mount zfs file system from vfstab?
Thanks,
Chris
Set the mountpoint property for the file system to "legacy" and add the
necessary info to
Hello all,
Is there any way to mount zfs file system from vfstab?
Thanks,
Chris
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
hose disks to the pool you migrated to.
This will prevent you from having to destroy all and restore.
Thanks,
George
Krzys wrote:
Weird question but I have two separate pools and I have zfs file system on
both of them, I wanted to see if there is a way to merge them together?!?
or I have to du
Weird question but I have two separate pools and I have zfs file system on both
of them, I wanted to see if there is a way to merge them together?!? or I have
to dump content to tape (or some other location) then destroy both pools make
one big pool of those two and then create zfs on it and rec
Hello folks, is there any way to get timestamps when doing "zpool iostat 1" for
example?
Well I did run zpool iostat 60 starting last night and I got some loads
indicating along the way but without a time stamps I cant figure out at around
what time did they happen.
Thanks.
Chris
_
That is bad such a big time difference... 14rs vs less than 2 hrs... did you
have the same hardware setup? I did not follow up the thread...
Chris
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Gino Ruopolo wrote:
Other test, same setup.
SOLARIS10:
zpool/a filesystem containing over 10Millions subdirs ea
in man page it does say "zpool df home" dows work, when I do type it it does not
work and I get the following error:
zpool df mypool
unrecognized command 'df'
usage: zpool command args ...
where 'command' is one of the following:
create [-fn] [-R root] [-m mountpoint] ...
dest
Hello everyone, I just wanted to play with zfs just a bit before I start using
it at my workplace on servers so I did set it up on my Solaris 10 U2 box.
I used to have all my disks mounted as UFS and everything was fine. I had my
/etc/vfstab as such:
#
fd - /dev
script that I do snaps
to just kill scrub..
Thanks for help.
Chris
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Krzys wrote:
This did work and all activity is stopped. :) Thank you.
Chris
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Eric Schrock wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:04:05AM -0400, Krzys wrote:
Ys, I did tun that command but
Well I did manually start it few days ago, unless there is some automatic way to
start it... Where could I find it out if it does automatically start or not?
thanks for the info.. I like this where I have a system to play with and
experiment it, I would hate it to be in production and behave li
This did work and all activity is stopped. :) Thank you.
Chris
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Eric Schrock wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:04:05AM -0400, Krzys wrote:
Ys, I did tun that command but it was quite a few days ago... :( Would it
take that long to complete? I would never imagine it would
Ys, I did tun that command but it was quite a few days ago... :( Would it take
that long to complete? I would never imagine it would... Is there any way to
stop it?
Chris
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 09:44, Krzys wrote:
scrub: scrub in progress, 35.37
I am running zfs set on 3 x 300gb HD's, I do see my disk activity going crazy
all the time, is there any reason for it? I have nothing running on this system,
just did setit up for testing purposes. I do replicate data from different
system once a day trough rsync but that is quick process an
I agree and I do not say what you do is wrong, I was just expressing my opinion
after what happend today on my system that there would be an excelent idea to
have such extra feature in ZFS...
Regards,
Chris
On Fri, 5 May 2006, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Krzys wrote:
Maybe there could be a
I realy do like the way NetApp is handling snaps :) that would be an excelent
thing in ZFS :)
On Fri, 5 May 2006, Marion Hakanson wrote:
Interesting discussion. I've often been impressed at how NetApp-like
the overal ZFS feature-set is (implies that I like NetApp's). Is it
verboten to compar
" and continue with
operations rather than have no space and put my system to a halt.
:)
On Fri, 5 May 2006, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Krzys wrote:
I did not think of it this way and it is a very valid point, but I still
think that most likely you would have a backup already on tape if ne
think it certainly
should be an option.
:)
Chris
On Fri, 5 May 2006, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Krzys wrote:
It would be also nice that if you have many snapshoots and you do run out
of space that the oldest snapshoot would be automatically removed untill
space is freed up. I did setup this
It would be also nice that if you have many snapshoots and you do run out of
space that the oldest snapshoot would be automatically removed untill space is
freed up. I did setup this snashoot that is beiing made every minute, then every
hour, day and a month, and I finally got to the point where
91 matches
Mail list logo
