On 29/11/2012 14:51, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris) wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Enda o'Connor - Oracle Ireland -
Say I have an ldoms guest that is using zfs root pool that is mirrored
down the
guest and the other service domain gracefully, then boot guest off
c3d0s0 ( have restarted the service domain there ), the large file is
obviously missing now.
Is there any way if the guest is stopped, that I can know which side of
the mirror to boot off that was most recent?
Enda
ot;interim diagnostic relief" patch
so are you on s11, can I see pkg info entire
this bug is fixed in FCS s11 release, as that is 175b, and it got fixed
in build 164. So if you have solaris 11 that CR is fixed.
In solaris 10 it is fixed in 147440-14/147441-14 ( sparc/x86 )
Enda
On 15/02/2012 17:16, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
While I'm not in need of upgrading my server at an emergency level, I'm
starting to think about it -- to be prepared (and an upgrade could be
triggered by a failure at this point; my server dates to 2006).
I'm actually more concerned with software th
current kernel level is, zones might have to
be halted if patching the live BE.
If doing tis manually, then apply latest rev of 119254/119255 (
SPARC/x86 ) patch utils patch first.
Enda
On 21/01/2012 10:46, bhanu prakash wrote:
Hi All,
Please let me know the procedure how to patch a server
On 29/09/2011 23:59, Rich Teer wrote:
Hi all,
Got a quick question: what are the latest zpool and zfs versions
supported in Solaris 10 Update 10?
TIA,
root@pstx2200a # zfs upgrade -v
The following filesystem versions are supported:
VER DESCRIPTION
--- -
in slice 0 say ( so that rpool has
the whole disk ).
Post boot of zfsBE, one can modify the swap and dump zvols ( look on
google for zfs root swap ).
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
DB that isn't properly monitored, and queries stated
to run really really slow.
Enda
On 09/12/2010 20:22, Jabbar wrote:
Hello Tony,
If the hardware hasn't changed I'd look at the workload on the database
server. If the customer is taking regular statspack snapshots they might
fault value?
In my experience with DB's, triggers are the root of all evil.
Enda
On 15/10/2010 14:36, Gerry Bragg wrote:
A customer is running ZFS version15 on Solaris SPARC 10/08 supporting
Oracle 10.2.0.3 databases in a dev and production test environment. We
have come across some cache incon
chive archvies the entire root pool ( there is a -D to exclude
datasets ), and can only be installed via jumpstart. There is no way to
provision a BE using a flash archive yet, or at least not that I'm aware of.
Enda
following is my current system status
lustatus
Boot Environment
ure if above looks correct to me, surely this should be
rpool/mailtmp, assuming you don't have other pools it might live in. (
what does zpool import say by the way )
Did this get added to a running zone, and then fail on reboot perhaps,ie
to me this never worked.
Enda
I just don'
delivers the
sparc new boot for zfs boot etc, jsut make sure you take the very latest
live upgrade patch 121430-43
Enda
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
I have a Solaris 10 U5 system massively patched so that it supports ZFS
pool version 15 (similar to U8, kernel Generic_141445-09), live upgrade
dick hoogendijk wrote:
OpenSolaris-b128a has zfs version 22 w/ deduplication.
Do I need to update older pools to take advantage of this dedup or can I
just create a new zfs filesystem with this option?
it's pool wide, so a zpool upgrade is necessary, or else create a new pool.
cheers
ied to pre update 9 releases to get the latest zpool version,
existing pools would require a zpool upgrade.
Enda
cheers,
James
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/z
.
Enda
Breandan Dezendorf wrote:
Does dedup work at the pool level or the filesystem/dataset level?
For example, if I were to do this:
bash-3.2$ mkfile 100m /tmp/largefile
bash-3.2$ zfs set dedup=off tank
bash-3.2$ zfs set dedup=on tank/dir1
bash-3.2$ zfs set dedup=on tank/dir2
bash-3.2$ zfs set
Hi
Yes sorry remove that line from vfstab in the new BE
Enda
Mark wrote:
Ok. Thanks. Why does '/' show up in the newly created /BE/etc/vfstab but
not in the current /etc/vfstab? Should '/' be in the /BE/etc/vfstab?
btw, thank you for responding so quickly to this.
Mark
Mark Horstman wrote:
Then why the warning on the lucreate. It hasn't done that in the past.
this is from the vfstab processing code in ludo.c, in your case not
causing any issue, but shall be fixed.
Enda
Mark
On Oct 21, 2009, at 12:41 PM, "Enda O'Connor" wrote:
Hi T
Hi T
his will boot ok in my opinion, not seeing any issues there.
Enda
Mark Horstman wrote:
more input:
# lumount foobar /mnt
/mnt
# cat /mnt/etc/vfstab
# cat /mnt/etc/vfstab
#live-upgrade: updated boot environment
#device device mount FS fsckmount
Hi
This looks ok to me, message but not an indicator of an issue
could you post
cat /etc/lu/ICF.1
cat /etc/ICF.2 ( the foobar Be )
also lumount foobar /a
and cat /a/etc/vfstab
Enda
Mark Horstman wrote:
I'm seeing the same [b]lucreate[/b] error on my fresh SPARC sol10u8 install
(a
55-70 before patching zfs root on x86 as
well, to avoid another issue.
what was the error/problem you ran into, output from patchadd + logs
from /var/sadm/patch/*/log for failed patch, or
/var/tmp/.log.$$ if they exist, plus some data on the setup, ie
zfs list and zonecfg to give an idea.
Enda
Hi
This is 6884728 which is a regression from 6837400.
the workaround is as you done, remove the lines from vfstab
Enda
Brian wrote:
I am have a strange problem with liveupgrade of ZFS boot environment. I found a similar discussion on the zones-discuss, but, this happens for me on installs
Hi
So ship date is 19th October for Solaris 10 10/09 ( update 8 ).
Enda
Enda O'Connor wrote:
Hi
Yes Solaris 10/09 ( update 8 ) will contain
6501037 want user/group quotas on zfs
it should be out within a few weeks.
So if they have zpools already installed they can apply
141444-09/1414
well for any
further instructions.
Enda
Tomas Ögren wrote:
On 28 September, 2009 - Jorgen Lundman sent me these 1,7K bytes:
Hello list,
We are unfortunately still experiencing some issues regarding our support
license with Sun, or rather our Sun Vendor.
We need ZFS User quotas. (That&#
an oracle point of view can really tell what is
workign as such.
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
details of the configuration
should prove
interesting.
isn't exadata based on linux, so not clear where zfs comes into play,
but I didn't see any of this oracle preso, so could be confused by all this.
Enda
-- richard
___
zfs-discuss
ed on opensolaris by the way.
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
error
format> label
Ready to label disk, continue? y
Warning: error writing EFI.
Label failed.
Any help would be appreciated.
run format -e then label and select SMI,
this will erase any data on said disks by the way.
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing l
Hi
What does boot -L show you?
Enda
On 08/28/09 15:59, cindy.swearin...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
I've had no more luck researching this, mostly because the error message
can mean different things in different scenarios.
I did try to reproduce it and I can't.
I noticed you a
tions,
including instructions on miniroot patching.
Enda
Fredrich Maney wrote:
Any idea what the Patch ID was?
fpsm
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Bob
Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Jerry K wrote:
It has been a while since this has been discussed, and I am hoping that
you can provi
ou searched instead with
$ pkg search -r smb
In SXCE, at least, /usr/lib/security/pam_smb_passwd.so is
part of the SUNWsmbfsu package.
Hi
And looks like 2008.11 has it in SUNWsmbs.
Enda
James
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp
ine to the end of /etc/pam.conf:
other password required pam_smb_passwd.so.1 nowarn
Do you know what that is?
I don't find any pkg named like that here.
pkg search -r pam|grep smb
try pkg search -r pam_smb_passwd.so.1
which gives SUNWsmbs pa
with zfs it's easy to set quotas so not really necessary, in ufs world,
it was just easier to keep var on a seperate disk slice etc, so that the
root FS would not fill with log files, patch data and or core dumps etc
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing l
75167
Let us know the exact errror seen and if possible the exact output from
patchadd 137137-09
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
isable zfs from starting on a different drive?
>
> HELP HELP HELP
boot the working alt root drive, mount the other drive to /a
then
mv /a/etc/zfs/zpool.cache /a/etc/zfs/zpool.cache.corrupt
reboot
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
Enda O'Connor wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Suppose I have a single ZFS pool on a single disk;
>> I want to upgrade the system to use two different, larger disks
>> and I want to mirror.
>>
>> Can I do something like:
>>
>> - I
stall the bootblk on disk#2 before removing disk#0,
zpool doesn't do this if you add a second disk to the system.
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
What hardware are you on, and what firmware are you at.
Issue is coming from firmware.
Enda
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi
Wierd, almost like some kind of memory corruption.
Could I see the upgrade logs, that got you to u6
ie
/var/sadm/system/logs/upgrade_log
for the u6 env.
What kind of upgrade did you do, liveupgrade, text based etc?
Enda
On 11/06/08 15:41, Krzys wrote:
> Seems like core.vold.* are not be
Hi
try and get the stack trace from the core
ie mdb core.vold.24978
::status
$C
$r
also run the same 3 mdb commands on the cpio core dump.
also if you could extract some data from the truss log, ie a few hundred
lines before the first SIGBUS
Enda
On 11/06/08 01:25, Krzys wrote:
> THis is
, in which case it
will take the swap and dump size you have preset.
But I think we need to see the coredump/truss at this point to get an
idea of where things went wrong.
Enda
On 11/05/08 15:38, Krzys wrote:
> I did upgrade my U5 to U6 from DVD, went trough the upgrade process.
> my file
Hi
No that should be fine, as long as disk is SMI labelled then that's
fine, and lU would have failed much earlier if it found an EFI labelled
disk.
core dump is not due to this, something else is causing that.
Enda
On 11/05/08 15:14, Krzys wrote:
> Great, I will follow this, b
Hi Krzys
Also some info on the actual system
ie what was it upgraded to u6 from and how.
and an idea of how the filesystems are laid out, ie is usr seperate from
/ and so on ( maybe a df -k ). Don't appear to have any zones installed,
just to confirm.
Enda
On 11/05/08 14:07, Enda O'Co
ulimit for coredumps
after this, in order to not risk filling the system with coredumps in
the case of some utility coredumping in a loop say.
Enda
On 11/05/08 13:46, Krzys wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Enda O'Connor wrote:
>
>> On 11/05/08 13:02, Krzys wrote:
>>> I
ount point .
> Copying.
> Bus Error - core dumped
hmm above might be relevant I'd guess.
What release are you on , ie is this Solaris 10, or is this Nevada build?
Enda
> Creating shared file system mount points.
> Creating compare databases for boot environment .
> Creatin
Hi
Clive King has a nice blog entry showing this in action
http://blogs.sun.com/clive/entry/replication_using_zfs
with associated script at:
http://blogs.sun.com/clive/resource/zfs_repl.ksh
Which I think answers most of your questions.
Enda
Ross wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Is anybody abl
gt; http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi
yes, its' in u6, I have migrated u5 ufs on svm to zfs boot
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
has finished, as the resilver will be restarted, this is fixed
in snv_94 though.
Enda
>
> The type of pool doesn't matter.
>
>
> Regards,
> markm
>
> ___
> zfs-discuss mai
suggest installing 138053-02, which requires
127127-11, the update 5 kernel patch. ( install latest patch utils patch
first though, 119255-xx )
Enda
Martin Gasthuber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in which opensolaris (nevada) version this fix is included
>
> thanks,
>Martin
>
able
> to change all FS to ZFS, including the space for the sparse zones.
zones can be on zfs or any other supported config in combination with zfs root.
Is there a specific question you had in mind with regard to sparse zones and
zfs root, no
too clear if I answered your actual query.
En
:~# installgrub /boot/grub/stage1 /boot/grub/stage2
> /dev/dsk/c5t1d0s0
> cannot open/stat device /dev/dsk/c5t1d0s2
>
that should be /dev/rdsk/c5t1d0s2
Enda
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Lori Alt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>
Dave wrote:
>
>
> Enda O'Connor wrote:
>>
>> As for thumpers, once 138053-02 ( marvell88sx driver patch ) releases
>> within the next two weeks ( assuming no issues found ), then the
>> thumper platform running s10 updates will be up to date in terms
ver patch ) releases
within the next two weeks ( assuming no issues found ), then the thumper
platform running s10 updates will be up to date in terms of marvel88sx
driver fixes, which fixes some pretty important issues for thumper.
Strongly suggest applying this patch to thump
Alan Burlison wrote:
> Lori Alt wrote:
>
>> It's hard to know what the "right" thing to do is from within
>> the installation software. Does the user want to preserve
>> as much of their current environment as possible? Or does
>> the user want to move toward the new "standard" configuration
>>
Boyd Adamson wrote:
> "Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
> [..]
>> meant to add that on x86 the following should do the trick ( again I'm open
>> to correction )
>>
>> installgrub /boot/grub/stage1
llowing:
>
> o Eliminates the need to create separate slices
> o Enables underlying ZFS architecture for swap and dump devices
> o Enables you to set characteristics like compression on swap
> and dump devices, and eventually, encryption
Hi
also makes resizing easy to do as well.
Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) wrote:
> Mike Gerdts wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:36 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Rainer,
>>>
>>> Sorry for your trouble.
>>>
>>> I'm updating the installboot exampl
Mike Gerdts wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:36 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Rainer,
>>
>> Sorry for your trouble.
>>
>> I'm updating the installboot example in the ZFS Admin Guide with the
>> -F zfs syntax now. We'll fix the installboot man page as well.
>
> Perhaps it also deserves a me
e zfs root will be in s10 update 6,or is in
current
nevada builds.
Enda
>
> In this case, what needs to be out of the array? Example, on a Linux system,
> I could set the /boot to be on a old 256MB USB flash.(As long the boot loader
> and kernel were out of the array the system would b
un an upgrade, as it needs args )
to see the version number.
BTW s10_u6 will have version 10, as will the kernel patch that releases
with u6 that applies to u5.
Enda
Chris Cosby wrote:
> We're running Solaris 10 U5 on lots of Sun SPARC hardware. That's ZFS
> version=4. Simple questi
Hi Tommaso
Have a look at the man page for zfs and the "attach" section in
particular, it will do the job nicely.
Enda
Tommaso Boccali wrote:
> Ciao,
> the rot filesystem of my thumper is a ZFS with a single disk:
>
> bash-3.2# zpool status rpool
> pool: rpool
,
device automatically transforms into a two-way mirror of device and new_device.
If device
is part of a two-way mirror, attaching new_device creates a three-way mirror,
and so on.
In either case, new_device begins to resilver immediately.
Enda
Srinivas Chadalavada wrote:
> Hi All,
>
&
te of space
really )
so one solution based on Mike's would be to create a symlink in the
pspool save/ for each undo.z being moved.
Note I have not tested any of this out so beware :-)
Enda
> Jim
> ---
> Mike Gerdts wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Bo
then drop the -a if all looks ok.
The recommended cluster ( under downloads in patch page ) has all the latest
patches and
requirements, might be easier to grab and work with it.
Enda
>
> TIA --Kenny
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> ___
will be, but the munges bit will trim it down
sufficiently ), so examine it and see if there are any zfs related stuff in there.
That might be sufficient to get an idea of where zfs is stuck, else might need the entire
text file.
Assuming that this actually works ( seen as reboot is apparently
There is no APAR for AIX 5.1 as it is out of support. If my fix levels
are correct, if you have installed 5.2.0.50 (or later) or 5.3.0.10 (or
later) or any level of 6.1 then you'll have the fix."
}
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>
Hi
Unfortunately 127871-* ,are currently feature patches used in update 5
builds, these patches won't be released until u5 ships, so that won't be
for another month perhaps. Very dange
stems.org/users/bfriesen/
> GraphicsMagick Maintainer,http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
>
> ___
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>
Hi Bob
Looking
stinfo/zfs-discuss
>
Hi
The latest patch is 127728-06, which requires 120011-14 ( the U4 kernel
patch )
x86 would be 127729 and Ku 120012-14.
I assume that your system already has zfs, or are you looking for the
list of patches to get zfs going in u1 or earlier
Enda
___
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>
upgrade of zones on zfs is just not supported yet
patching does wok though for zones on zfs
add 119254-50/119255-50 (SPARC/X86 ) and patching will eork
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs
my mistake, getting confused by release numbers, 9.07 was what
Richard meant.
Enda
> When is the next release for Sparc due out?
>
> Paul
>
>
> -Original Message-
>> From: "Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>&g
e download site ( or should be ) and works for
SPARC/x86 ( same as any Solaris 10 release )
What writeup are you looking at?
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
/119255 revision 49, we hope to release this in the coming days (
maybe by COB today even )
>
>> Recommendations?
>>
>
> Use Solaris 10 9/07. It has more than a year's worth of improvements
> and enhancements to Solaris.
I think you mean 8/07, ( update 4
David Runyon wrote:
> Does anyone know this?
>
> David Runyon
> Disk Sales Specialist
>
> Sun Microsystems, Inc.
> 4040 Palm Drive
> Santa Clara, CA 95054 US
> Mobile 925 323-1211
> Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> Russ Lai wrote:
>> Dave;
>> Does ZFS support Oracle RAC?
> __
Dick Davies wrote:
> I had some trouble installing a zone on ZFS with S10u4
> (bug in the postgres packages) that went away when I used a
> ZVOL-backed UFS filesystem
> for the zonepath.
>
Hi
Out of interest what was the bug.
Enda
> I thought I'd push on with the exper
t
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi Paul
is it not zpool upgrade -a,
but I could be wrong
I seem to remember zpool upgrade does not actually upgrade unless you
specify the -a.
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Enda,
Wednesday, April 11, 2007, 4:21:35 PM, you wrote:
EOCSMSI> Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello zfs-discuss,
In order to get IDR126199-01 I need to install 120473-05 first.
I can get 120473-07 but everything more than -05 is marked as
incompatible w
73-05 also so I'm
stuck for now and I would really like to get that IDR running.
Can someone help?
Hi
This patch will be on SunSolve possibly later today, tomorrow at latest
I suspect as it has only justed being pushed out from testing.
I have sent the patch in another mail for n
as).
If you can remember to plan ahead, then yes. ;)
-brian
not necessarily, metainit -a -f will force all onto one disk, but should
only be used in emergency cases really, where you are already in the
situation of not having a partition to put the me
time stamp as part of the
name )
see if 124205 is in this file, I will check with the people responsible
for current.zip in the mean time.
I suspect that a current.zip including this patch has not been released yet.
Enda
David W. Smith wrote:
I'm pretty sure I have a service plan, but
a guess, as 124205-04 was released on the 31st
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
unix/libc in the Ku and the zfs utilites in the zfs patch. So the
bug will be listed in the KU and the ZFS patch.
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi
I logged CR 6457216 to track this for now.
Enda
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer wrote:
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer wrote:
Hi
I guess the problem is that David is using sm
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer wrote:
Hi
I guess the problem is that David is using smpatch (our automated patching
system )
So in theory he is up to date on his patches
( he has since removed
122660-02
122658-02
1226
directory
#
I rebooted the zone and then the system, touching /reconfigure, all to no
avail
I then added the rest of the patches you suggested and rebooted my zones
and I had /dev/zfs, strange.
But David had all the patches added and still did not get /dev/zfs in the
non global zones
Enda
George
e
I've reversed the order so that the mount -o goes in first before the subsequent
zfs creates.
thanks
Enda
Eric Schrock wrote:
Yes, this is a known bug, or rather a clever variation of a known bug.
I don't have the ID handy, but the problem is that 'zfs unmount -a' (and
&
Slight typo
I had to run
# zfs umount tank
cannot unmount 'tank': not currently mounted
# zfs umount /export/home1
# zfs umount /export/home
#
in order to get zpool destroy to run
Enda
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer wrote:
Hi
I was trying to
tank
cannot unshare 'tank/home': /export/home: not shared
cannot unshare 'tank/home1': /export/home1: not shared
could not destroy 'tank': could not unmount datasets
#
I eventually got this to go with
# zfs umount tank/home
# zfs umount tank/home1
# zp
Hi
Looks like same stack as 6413847, although it is pointed more towards hardware
failure.
the stack below is from 5.11 snv_38, but also seems to affect update 2 as
per above bug.
Enda
Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
Hi,
my colleage is just testing ZFS and created a zpool which had a backing
update 2 and beyond are supported others say
that those on pre update 2 will also be supported via patches.
Could someone attempt to clarify this issue for me.
regards
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
89 matches
Mail list logo
