I made a bad judgment and now my raidz pool is corrupted. I have a raidz pool
running on Opensolaris b85. I wanted to try out freenas 0.7 and tried to add
my pool to freenas.
After adding the zfs disk, vdev and pool. I decided to back out and went back
to opensolaris. Now my raidz pool will
If you're using a mirror, and each disk manages 50 MB/second (unlikely if it's
a single disk doing a lot of seeks, but you might do better using a hardware
array for each half of the mirror), simple math says that scanning 1 TB would
take roughly 20,000 seconds, or 5 hours. So your speed under S
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:09 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/04/2008 02:19:23 AM:
>>
>>> Jorgen Lundman wrote:
>>>
>>> > We did ask our vendor, but we were just told that AVS does not support
>>>
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:09 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/04/2008 02:19:23 AM:
>
>> Jorgen Lundman wrote:
>>
>> > We did ask our vendor, but we were just told that AVS does not support
>> > x4500.
>>
>>
>> The officially supported AVS works on the X4500 since the
Steve Goldberg wrote:
> Hi Lori,
>
> is ZFS boot still planned for S10 update 6?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
> --
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> ___
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/
Hi Lori,
is ZFS boot still planned for S10 update 6?
Thanks,
Steve
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Richard Elling wrote:
> Source packages are usually in a Solaris distribution (overloaded term,
> but look at something like Solaris 10 5/08) and typically end in "S" So
> look in the Product directory for something like SUNWsambaS. Of course,
SUNWsmbaS as it turns out... You
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/04/2008 03:40:46 PM:
>
> On 4-Sep-08, at 4:52 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
>
> > Marcelo Leal wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >> Any plans (or already have), a send/receive way to get the
> >> transfer backup statistics? I mean, the "how much" was transfered,
> >> time and/or
On 4-Sep-08, at 4:52 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
> Marcelo Leal wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> Any plans (or already have), a send/receive way to get the
>> transfer backup statistics? I mean, the "how much" was transfered,
>> time and/or bytes/sec?
>>
>
> I'm not aware of any plans, you should file
Marcelo Leal wrote:
> Hello all,
> Any plans (or already have), a send/receive way to get the transfer backup
> statistics? I mean, the "how much" was transfered, time and/or bytes/sec?
>
I'm not aware of any plans, you should file an RFE.
> And the last question... i did see in many thread
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 14:18, Marcelo Leal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
> I was used to use mirrors and solaris 10, in which the scrub process for
> 500gb took about two hours... and with solaris express (snv_79a) tests,
> terabytes in minutes. I did search for release changes in the
Hello all,
I was used to use mirrors and solaris 10, in which the scrub process for 500gb
took about two hours... and with solaris express (snv_79a) tests, terabytes in
minutes. I did search for release changes in the scrub process, and could not
find anything about enhancements in this magnitu
Hello all,
Any plans (or already have), a send/receive way to get the transfer backup
statistics? I mean, the "how much" was transfered, time and/or bytes/sec?
And the last question... i did see in many threads the question about "the
consistency between the send/receive through ssh"... but no
The issue is EXANET isn't really holding "300 million files" in one dataset
like you're talking about doing with zfs. It's a clustered approach with a
single namespace.
Reality is you can do what the customer wants to do, but you'd be leveraging
something like pnfs which I don't think is quite pr
Hi,
My problem is one of my customer wants to change his Exanet Systems to ZFS, but
SUN told him that there is real limitation with ZFS :
Customer env :
Incoming Data
FS SIZE : 50 TB, with at least 100 Thousand files write per day, around 20
Millions files.
Consulting Data
FS Size : 200 TB with
Alain,
I think you want to use fmdump -eV to display the extended device
information. See the output below.
Cindy
class = ereport.fs.zfs.checksum
ena = 0x3242b9cdeac00401
detector = (embedded nvlist)
nvlist version: 0
version = 0x0
sch
You should be able to do 'zpool status -x' to find out what vdev is
broken. A useful extension to the DE would be to add a label to the
suspect corresponding to /.
- Eric
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 06:34:33PM +0200, Alain Ch?reau wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ZFS send a message to FMA in case of disk failu
Hi all,
ZFS send a message to FMA in case of disk failure.
The detail of the message reference a vdev by an hexadecimal number as:
# *fmdump -V -u 50ea07a0-2cd9-6bfb-ff9e-e219740052d5*
TIME UUID SUNW-MSG-ID
Feb 18 11:07:29.5195 50ea07a0-2cd9-6bfb-f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/04/2008 02:19:23 AM:
> Jorgen Lundman wrote:
>
> > We did ask our vendor, but we were just told that AVS does not support
> > x4500.
>
>
> The officially supported AVS works on the X4500 since the X4500 came
> out. But, although Jim Dunham and others will tell you oth
Thanks for the replies.
I guess I misunderstood the manual:
zpool replace [-f] pool old_device [new_device]
Replaces old_device with new_device. This is equivalent to attaching
new_device, waiting for it to resilver, and then detaching old_device.
The size of new_device must be greater
Brent Jones wrote:
> I did some Googling, but I saw some limitations sharing your ZFS pool
> via NFS while using HAStorage Cluster product as well.
[...]
> If you are using the zettabyte file system (ZFS) as the exported file
> system, you must set the sharenfs property to off.
That's not a lim
On 03 September, 2008 - Aaron Blew sent me these 2,5K bytes:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Miles Nordin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've never heard of a battery that's used for anything but RAID
> > features. It's an interesting question, if you use the controller in
> > ``JBOD mode''
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Ralf Ramge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jorgen Lundman wrote:
>
> > We did ask our vendor, but we were just told that AVS does not support
> > x4500.
>
>
> The officially supported AVS works on the X4500 since the X4500 came
> out. But, although Jim Dunham and oth
Jorgen Lundman wrote:
> We did ask our vendor, but we were just told that AVS does not support
> x4500.
The officially supported AVS works on the X4500 since the X4500 came
out. But, although Jim Dunham and others will tell you otherwise, I
absolutely can *not* recommend using it on this hard
24 matches
Mail list logo
