Re: [yocto] [Patch v2 0/4] Misc Fixes for meta-intel 1.3 release

2012-11-01 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 22:26 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > On 10/31/2012 10:14 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote: > > From: Nitin A Kamble > > > > This v2 pull request is with newer version of libva-intel-driver. > > These commits tested on All the BSPs I am maintaining with expected results. > >

Re: [yocto] [Patch v2 0/4] Misc Fixes for meta-intel 1.3 release

2012-11-01 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 22:14 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote: > From: Nitin A Kamble > > This v2 pull request is with newer version of libva-intel-driver. > These commits tested on All the BSPs I am maintaining with expected results. > OK, I've confirmed video works on crownbay and have tw

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][meta-intel] Update README Instructions

2012-11-01 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 15:14 -0700, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote: > From: Kishore Bodke > > This updates the README on how to get the DPDK and QuickAssist > Technology recipes > > Please pull them into meta-intel/master. > Pulled into meta-intel/master. Thanks, Tom > Thanks > Kishore. >

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] [meta-intel] update MAINTAINERS with patch instructions

2012-11-01 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 16:27 -0500, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: > From: Tom Zanussi > > This patch adds some extra instructions for meta-intel patch submission. > > Please pull into meta-intel/master. > Pulled into meta-intel/master. Tom > The following

Re: [yocto] [PATCH meta-intel] meta-cedartrail: really fix mesa-dri version (typo'd)

2012-11-05 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 10:08 -0600, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: > Hi Tom, > > > > Can this go to danny as we already had cut off? > Is it a show-stopper? If so, we'll have to pull it in and do an RC3 I guess. If not, I can still pull it in to danny, it just won't be included in the release (you

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/3] xserver-xorg: bump PR to get the new xorg-abi- RPROVIDES

2012-11-06 Thread Tom Zanussi
Missing signed-off-by. Tom On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 12:47 +, Ross Burton wrote: > --- > common/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg-1.9.3.inc |2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/common/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg-1.9.3.inc > b/commo

Re: [yocto] [meta-intel] Add Xorg ABI dependencies

2012-11-06 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 12:47 +, Ross Burton wrote: > Hi, > > Following are patches against master (*not* danny) to add runtime dependencies > on the Xorg ABI version to the binary drivers, a symbol that the Xorg server > provides. > > This means that mismatching server/driver ABIs becomes a pa

Re: [yocto] [PATCH meta-intel] meta-cedartrail: really fix mesa-dri version (typo'd)

2012-11-06 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 12:31 +, Ross Burton wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton Pulled into meta-intel/danny-next and meta-intel/master. Thanks, Tom > --- > meta-cedartrail/conf/machine/cedartrail.conf |2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta-cedart

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/3] xserver-xorg: bump PR to get the new xorg-abi- RPROVIDES

2012-11-06 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 14:32 -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote: > Missing signed-off-by. > Please just reply to this with your Signed-off-by and I can pull all three in, thanks... Tom > Tom > > On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 12:47 +, Ross Burton wrote: > > --- > > common/re

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/3] xserver-xorg: bump PR to get the new xorg-abi- RPROVIDES

2012-11-06 Thread Tom Zanussi
Thanks, Ross! All three now pulled into meta-intel/master. Tom On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 00:03 +, Ross Burton wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton > > > -- > Ross Burton > Sent with Sparrow > > > On Tuesday, 6 November 2012 at 23:22, Tom Zanussi wrote: > &

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] [meta-inte] romley: update README Instructions

2012-11-08 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 15:21 -0800, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote: > From: Kishore Bodke > > Add instructions on how to get the Intel DPDK > recipes for the Romley BSP. > > Please pull into meta-intel/danny. > Pulled into meta-intel/danny-next and meta-intel/master. Thanks, Tom > Thanks >

[yocto] [PATCH 0/1] meta-intel: new meta-intel mailing list information

2012-11-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi There's a new mailing list for meta-intel traffic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel meta-intel patches and other meta-intel-specific e-mail should now go there instead of to the Yocto mailing list. This patchset updates the MAINTAINERS file with that

[yocto] [PATCH 1/1] meta-intel: update MAINTAINERS with meta-intel mailing list info

2012-11-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi The newly created meta-intel mailing list is where meta-intel-specific e-mail and patches should now go. Update MAINTAINERS with that information. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- MAINTAINERS | 32 ++-- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] meta-intel: update MAINTAINERS with meta-intel mailing list info

2012-11-11 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 18:22 -0500, Philip Balister wrote: > On 11/11/2012 06:18 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: > > From: Tom Zanussi > > > > The newly created meta-intel mailing list is where meta-intel-specific > > e-mail and patches should now go. Update MAINTAINER

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2][meta-intel]meta-cedartrail: For cedartrail-nopvr, Update meta br SRCREV and add linux-yocto preferred version

2012-11-11 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 15:17 -0800, rahul.sax...@intel.com wrote: > From: Rahul Saxena > > This patch set does the following: > > Update kernel meta branch SRCREV for cedartrail-nopvr machine > > Added PREFERRED_VERSION for linux-yocto for cedartrail-nopvr machine to avoid > build warnings. >

Re: [yocto] is anyone getting pathetic git download from the new kmod SRC_URI?

2012-11-20 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 15:27 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > maybe it's something i'm doing, but oe-core just changed the SRC_URI > for kmod to git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/kernel/kmod/kmod.git, > and the response from the URL couldn't suck any worse than if it > sucked totally. i've yet to

Re: [yocto] [meta-intel][danny][PATCH V2] mesa-dri_8.0.4.bbappend: Remove tabs from python code

2012-11-21 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 12:36 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > check for xserver to be non-empty before using it > fixed errors like > > ERROR: Failed to parse recipe: > /b/kraj/yocto/poky/meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-dri_8.0.4.bb > ERROR: Error executing a python function in : > AttributeError: 'NoneTyp

Re: [yocto] [meta-intel][fri2][PATCH] meta-fri2: update README to match current emgd driver version

2012-11-21 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 15:43 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi Pulled into meta-intel/master and meta-intel/danny-next. Thanks, Tom > --- > meta-fri2/README |8 > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta-fri2/README b/meta-fri2/READM

Re: [yocto] does meta-intel/meta-tlk layer require a README.sources file?

2012-11-26 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Sat, 2012-11-24 at 07:59 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > more annoying pedantry, but from what i read in the current yocto > BSP manual, a BSP layer *requires* a README.sources file, but there is > no such file in the meta-intel/meta-tlk layer, although i can > appreciate that that layer isn't

Re: [yocto] Intel announces S1200 low power family, so when might we see a Yocto BSP....

2012-12-13 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 09:14 -0500, Bob Cochran wrote: > Hello, > > As reported in Information Week (link below), Intel announced a new Atom > S1200 family for micro servers. I believe Yocto has applications for > this family of processors. Assuming this is true, when do we see a > Yocto BSP f

[yocto] [PATCH 1/5] scripts/lib/bsp/engine.py: add yocto_layer_create()

2012-12-17 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi Add a new yocto_layer_create() function that will be used to generate a generic yocto layer (for the new 'yocto-layer' command). Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- scripts/lib/bsp/engine.py | 56 +++ 1 file changed, 56

[yocto] [PATCH 3/5] yocto-layer: add help/usage

2012-12-17 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi This is essentially 'the documentation' for the yocto-layer tool. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- scripts/lib/bsp/help.py | 228 1 file changed, 228 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/lib/bsp/help.py b/scripts/lib/b

[yocto] [PATCH 4/5] yocto-layer: add 'layer' template data

2012-12-17 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi Add a 'layer' target containing all the data that will be used to generate a generic yocto layer. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- .../bsp/substrate/target/arch/layer/COPYING.MIT| 17 ++ scripts/lib/bsp/substrate/target/arch/layer/R

[yocto] [PATCH 5/5] scripts/lib/bsp/engine.py: refactor bsp-creation code

2012-12-17 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi This does a bit of refactoring of the bsp-generation code to make it generically reusable for generating non-bsp layers. The first user remains the existing yocto-bsp tool; these changes allow a second user, the new yocto-layer tool, to use the same code. Signed-off-by: Tom

[yocto] [PATCH 0/5] RFC: new 'yocto-layer' tool for creating generic Yocto layers

2012-12-17 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi Since I've been doing kind of similar work lately for the 'custom kernel' support for yocto-bsp and have gotten several requests lately (mainly from Darren in support of the new kernel documentation) for something like this, I decided to just go ahead and

[yocto] [PATCH 2/5] yocto-layer: new script

2012-12-17 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi Implementation of the 'yocto-layer' command-line tool, for creating generic layers and listing their input properties. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- scripts/yocto-layer | 142 1 file changed, 142 insertions(

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/5] scripts/lib/bsp/engine.py: add yocto_layer_create()

2012-12-18 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 09:13 -0500, Philip Balister wrote: > On 12/17/2012 12:51 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: > > From: Tom Zanussi > > > > Add a new yocto_layer_create() function that will be used to generate > > a generic yocto layer (for the new 'yocto-layer

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/5] scripts/lib/bsp/engine.py: add yocto_layer_create()

2012-12-18 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 11:37 -0500, Philip Balister wrote: > On 12/18/2012 09:33 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 09:13 -0500, Philip Balister wrote: > >> On 12/17/2012 12:51 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: > >>> From: Tom Zanussi > >&

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/5] RFC: new 'yocto-layer' tool for creating generic Yocto layers

2012-12-20 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:34 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > On 12/17/2012 09:51 AM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: > > From: Tom Zanussi > > > > Since I've been doing kind of similar work lately for the 'custom kernel' > > support for yocto-bsp and have gotte

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 4/5] yocto-layer: add 'layer' template data

2012-12-20 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:40 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > > On 12/17/2012 09:51 AM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: > > From: Tom Zanussi > > > > Add a 'layer' target containing all the data that will be used to > > generate a generic yocto la

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 4/5] yocto-layer: add 'layer' template data

2012-12-20 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 09:29 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2012-12-20 09:23, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 16:40 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > >> > >> On 12/17/2012 09:51 AM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: > >>> From: Tom Zanussi > >>>

Re: [yocto] [meta-intel][PATCH] layer.conf: Use .= for adding to BBPATH and += to BBFILES

2013-01-07 Thread Tom Zanussi
age in the future. > > Also, please use the meta-intel mailing list for changes to meta-intel > (Cc'd now). > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel > > Tom, any objection? > No, the changes look fine to me. Acked-by: Tom Zanussi > > >

Re: [yocto] Bitbake and task offloading onto multiple cloud-based servers

2013-01-08 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 21:17 +, Alex J Lennon wrote: > On 04/01/2013 21:08, Chris Larson wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Alex J Lennon > > mailto:ajlen...@dynamicdevices.co.uk>> > > wrote: > > > > Can anybody advise on whether bitbake currently supports offloading of >

Re: [yocto] Bitbake and task offloading onto multiple cloud-based servers

2013-01-09 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 11:58 +, Alex J Lennon wrote: > > In the 1.1 timeframe I proposed something similar for a demo/research > > project - I'll just copy the proposal verbatim below in case any of the > > ideas could be of any value. > > Very interesting Tom. Thanks for your thoughts. > >

[yocto] [PATCH 0/7] new 'yocto-layer' tool for creating generic Yocto layers, v1

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi Since I've been doing kind of similar work lately for the 'custom kernel' support for yocto-bsp and have gotten several requests lately (mainly from Darren in support of the new kernel documentation) for something like this, I decided to just go ahead and

[yocto] [PATCH 1/7] scripts/lib/bsp/engine.py: add yocto_layer_create()

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi Add a new yocto_layer_create() function that will be used to generate a generic yocto layer (for the new 'yocto-layer' command). Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- scripts/lib/bsp/engine.py | 56 +++ 1 file changed, 56

[yocto] [PATCH 2/7] yocto-layer: new script

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi Implementation of the 'yocto-layer' command-line tool, for creating generic layers and listing their input properties. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- scripts/yocto-layer | 142 1 file changed, 142 insertions(

[yocto] [PATCH 3/7] yocto-layer: add help/usage

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi This is essentially 'the documentation' for the yocto-layer tool. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- scripts/lib/bsp/help.py | 228 1 file changed, 228 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/lib/bsp/help.py b/scripts/lib/b

[yocto] [PATCH 4/7] yocto-layer: add 'layer' template data

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi Add a 'layer' target containing all the data that will be used to generate a generic yocto layer. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- .../bsp/substrate/target/arch/layer/COPYING.MIT| 17 ++ scripts/lib/bsp/substrate/target/arch/layer/R

[yocto] [PATCH 5/7] scripts/lib/bsp/engine.py: refactor bsp-creation code

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi This does a bit of refactoring of the bsp-generation code to make it generically reusable for generating non-bsp layers. The first user remains the existing yocto-bsp tool; these changes allow a second user, the new yocto-layer tool, to use the same code. Signed-off-by: Tom

[yocto] [PATCH 6/7] yocto-layer: add optional layer priority param

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi If the user specifies a layer priority following the layer name, layer creation will proceed without further queries using the specified layer priority and the remaining values defaulted. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- scripts/lib/bsp/help.py | 14 -- scripts

[yocto] [PATCH 7/7] scripts/lib/bsp/engine.py: add handling for JSON strings

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi Normally pre-canned properties are supplied as JSON from a file, which the user can specify using e.g. the -i option. We can reuse that basic functionality for dedicated command-line parameters by sythesizing a JSON string containing those param values on the fly and passing

Re: [yocto] YP Profiling and Tracing Manual available

2013-01-21 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 15:17 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2013, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > There is a new YP-style manual called "Yocto Project Profiling and > > Tracing Manual" available at > > http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.4/profile-manual/profile-manual.h

Re: [yocto] [meta-intel][PATCH 2/2] fri2.conf: mesa-dri was updated to 9.0.1

2013-01-24 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 22:22 +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 24 January 2013 19:06, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > > Ping. > > Your pings are misdirected - the meta-intel patches should now be > going to meta-in...@yoctoproject.org. > Oops, yeah, I somehow missed these, sorry - let me try them out and

Re: [yocto] [meta-intel][PATCH 2/2] fri2.conf: mesa-dri was updated to 9.0.1

2013-01-25 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 21:06 +0200, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Andrei Gherzan > wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Ross Burton > wrote: > > On Sunday, 13 January 2013 at 19:39, Andrei Gherzan > wrote: >

Re: [yocto] [meta-intel][PATCH 1/2] ffmpeg: Remove package as nobody depends on it anymore

2013-01-25 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 21:10 +0200, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > Ping > Pulled into meta-intel/master. Thanks, Tom > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Andrei Gherzan > wrote: > Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan > --- > common/recipes-multimedia/ffmpeg/ffmpeg.inc | 110

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

2013-02-12 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 22:02 -0800, Sean Liming wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- > > boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Liu, Song > > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:25 PM > > To: Chris Tapp > > Cc: Darren Hart; Yocto Discussion M

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

2013-02-12 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 21:34 +, Chris Tapp wrote: > On 12 Feb 2013, at 19:56, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 22:02 -0800, Sean Liming wrote: > >> > >>> -Original Message- > >>> From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mai

[yocto] Updated Yocto Hands-on Kernel Lab available

2013-02-15 Thread Tom Zanussi
Hi, I'm happy to announce that an updated version of the Yocto 'Hands-on Kernel Lab' has been released and is available here: https://www.yoctoproject.org/sites/yoctoproject.org/files/elc2013-kernel-lab.pdf The above document contains all the instructions you need to get started from scratch. Y

Re: [yocto] Slides from the Yocto Developer Day

2013-02-15 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 08:43 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > On 01/30/2013 06:41 AM, Marco wrote: > > Il 13/11/2012 08:01, Scott Garman ha scritto: > >> On 11/12/2012 11:52 AM, Anna Dushistova wrote: > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> Are the slides available somewhere? > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> Anna. > >> > >>

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2][meta-intel] Remove Cedartrail BSP

2013-02-16 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 14:34 -0800, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote: > From: Kishore Bodke > > Hi All, > > This patch set is to remove Cedartrail BSP from > meta-intel/master. > Cedartrail BSP will be no longer supported in Yocto > from 1.4 release. > > Please pull these patches into meta-intel

Re: [yocto] kernel menuconfig unusable Was: Updated Yocto Hands-on Kernel Lab available

2013-02-17 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 16:22 -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > I'm happy to announce that an updated version of the Yocto 'Hands-on > > Kernel Lab' has been released and is available here: > > This is aweso

Re: [yocto] Fwd: Updated Yocto Hands-on Kernel Lab available

2013-02-17 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 21:16 -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote: > ...sorry, I meant to CC the list too > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Trevor Woerner > Date: Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 9:15 PM > Subject: Re: [yocto] Updated Yocto Hands-on Kernel Lab availa

Re: [yocto] Updated Yocto Hands-on Kernel Lab available

2013-02-18 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 18:50 -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote: > I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong, but I can't get lab3 to work. > > Following the instructions in the pdf I first tried doing lab3 > incrementally (build/test, build/test, build/test) and it didn't work. > Then I tried deleting (tmp

Re: [yocto] Updated Yocto Hands-on Kernel Lab available

2013-02-19 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 05:31 -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > So when you say it doesn't work, you mean the module autoload didn't > > work, but everything else did? > > Yes, exactly. > > > Did you

Re: [yocto] Updated Yocto Hands-on Kernel Lab available

2013-02-20 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 22:34 -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote: > Following up on a hunch, after reading Pierre Ficheux's email from > earlier today, I realized that by default I always switch my build's > PACKAGE_CLASSES to ipk simply because this packaging takes the least > amount of build time. Sure en

Re: [yocto] perf build breaks in poky master branch

2013-03-19 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 14:06 +0100, Maxin B. John wrote: > Hi, > > Perf build fails while trying to build core-image-minimal for qemux86, Hi, Richard has just pushed a fix for a thinko in the patch, please pull and try again. Tom > $ git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky > $ cd poky > $ s

Re: [yocto] This one can't be me...

2013-04-05 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 11:48 -0700, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > > From: Bodke, Kishore K > > > > Here are the config parameters for the clean build that I am > > doing now. > > > > kishore@kishore-desktop:/usr/local/src/cedartrail/build/tmp/wo > rk/cedartrail_nopvr-poky-linux/linux-yocto-3.0.32+git1

Re: [yocto] This one can't be me...

2013-04-05 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 18:34 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 11:48 -0700, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > > > From: Bodke, Kishore K > > > > > > Here are the config parameters for the clean build that I am > > > doing now. > > > > &g

Re: [yocto] This one can't be me...

2013-04-05 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 21:15 -0700, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > > From: Tom Zanussi [mailto:tom.zanu...@intel.com] > > > > I'm seeing the same thing here (# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM is not set) with > > your bblayers and local.conf. For some reason the base and > > sta

Re: [yocto] This one can't be me...

2013-04-06 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 23:48 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 21:15 -0700, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > > > From: Tom Zanussi [mailto:tom.zanu...@intel.com] > > > > > > I'm seeing the same thing here (# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM is not set) with > >

Re: [yocto] This one can't be me...

2013-04-06 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 11:20 -0700, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > > From: Tom Zanussi > > > > It looks like the problem is a bad SRCREV for the meta branch in the > > -nopvr machine in the cedartrail danny tarball. Try changing the > > following line in > > meta-c

Re: [yocto] working my way through the kernel hands-on labs finally

2013-04-08 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 11:41 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > finally have the time to work my way through the ELC 2013 hands on > kernel labs described here: > > https://www.yoctoproject.org/tools-resources/presentations/working-kernel > > since i'll almost certainly use some of them in my next y

Re: [yocto] working my way through the kernel hands-on labs finally

2013-04-09 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 18:06 -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Robert P. J. Day > wrote: > > ok, so what am i looking for? > > I couldn't get lab3 to work fully unless I switched from package_ipk > to package_rpm. The module would get built and included in the image

Re: [yocto] couple questions about kernel dev manual, section 2

2013-04-13 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Sat, 2013-04-13 at 11:20 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > some oddities in section 2.2.1 of the current kernel dev manual. > first, there's: > > "The append file should initially contain the following text: > > FILESEXTRAPATHS := "${THISDIR}/${PN}" > > i was under the impression that t

Re: [yocto] how strict are released BSP requirements?

2013-04-19 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:19 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > (aside: currently going through yocto BSP developer's guide with my > proofreader's beanie on so be prepared for a few BSP-related questions > today. you've been warned.) > > in section on BSP requirements: > > http://www.yoctoproject

Re: [yocto] clarification about BSP layer names and bblayers.conf file?

2013-04-19 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:37 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > from section 1.1 of BSP developers guide: > > http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/bsp-guide/bsp-guide.html#bsp-layers > > first, it's not actually *required* that a layer name start with the > prefix "meta-", is it? pretty sure it'

Re: [yocto] clarification about BSP layer names and bblayers.conf file?

2013-04-20 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 05:35 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > > On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:37 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > second, the BBLAYERS example there seems overly complicated and > > > potentially c

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][meta-yocto] Fix typoes in BSP help scripts.

2013-04-22 Thread Tom Zanussi
should have been named something else. ;-) Acked-by: Tom Zanussi > --- > > i'm assuming i'm not misintgerpreting what's happening here. > > > > diff --git a/scripts/lib/bsp/help.py b/scripts/lib/bsp/help.py > index 427b5a0..d152025 100644 > ---

Re: [yocto] remaining comments on current BSP developers guide

2013-04-22 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 12:00 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > (again, someone up the food chain can decide what's worth > processing.) > Thanks for all your comments - I'll submit some patches to the docs when I get a chance, but see below.. > 1.6.1 Common Features > > * "Both tools [yocto-bsp a

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] meta-jasperforest: Fix BBFILES

2013-04-23 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 13:26 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > BBFILES is whitespace delimited. If .= used, no whitespace padding is added > around > the addition and this can lead to it being combined with some other part of > the > field, leading to parts of BBFILES mysteriously not being seen. >

Re: [yocto] [meta-intel] [PATCH] tiny-init: Drop the bbappend

2013-05-16 Thread Tom Zanussi
Pulled into meta-intel/master. Thanks, Tom On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 12:15 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > On 05/15/2013 09:57 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > init file which it was providing is ditto as meta-yocto > > so bbappend is redundant plus it gets rid of following warning > > for non poky distros. >

[yocto] Yocto Hands-on Kernel Lab dylan (1.4) update available

2013-05-23 Thread Tom Zanussi
Hi, I'm happy to announce that the Yocto 'Hands-on Kernel Lab' has been updated for dylan (Yocto 1.4) and is available here: https://www.yoctoproject.org/sites/yoctoproject.org/files/kernel-lab-1.4.pdf The above document contains all the instructions you need to get started from scratch. Beside

Re: [yocto] Problem to compile kernel (enable nfsd)

2013-05-29 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 15:15 -0300, Caio wrote: > Hello, > > I'm following the ELC2013 hands-on > (https://www.yoctoproject.org/sites/yoctoproject.org/files/elc2013-kernel-lab.pdf) > but with poky 9.0. > > Git Branch (b15bdd842092f2335784c20b8e1b3a0ddcf7996b) > > In the lab3 I'm trying to compile

Re: [yocto] Problem to compile kernel (enable nfsd)

2013-05-29 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 14:19 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 13-05-29 02:15 PM, Caio wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm following the ELC2013 hands-on > > (https://www.yoctoproject.org/sites/yoctoproject.org/files/elc2013-kernel-lab.pdf) > > but with poky 9.0. > > > > Git Branch (b15bdd842092f2335784c2

Re: [yocto] Cedartrail and Dylan?

2013-06-18 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 16:56 -0700, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > I've been using the Intel meta-cedartrail layer with Danny 8.0.1. Is this > layer likely to be unusable with Dylan 9.0? Or unusable without lots of > tinkering that's probably beyond my abilities? > > And if I were to try Dylan, is it bes

Re: [yocto] Cedartrail and Dylan?

2013-06-18 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 09:17 -0700, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > > From: Tom Zanussi > > > > I believe the main problem would be the graphics driver - it > > would need > > porting to the 3.8 kernel - the rest would probably be > > straightforward. > >

Re: [yocto] Cedartrail and Dylan?

2013-06-18 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 20:50 +0100, Chris Tapp wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On 18 Jun 2013, at 15:04, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 16:56 -0700, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > >> I've been using the Intel meta-cedartrail layer with Danny 8.0.1. Is this >

Re: [yocto] Cedartrail and Dylan?

2013-06-19 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 16:09 -0700, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > > From: Tom Zanussi > > > > On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 20:50 +0100, Chris Tapp wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On 18 Jun 2013, at 15:04, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > > > >

Re: [yocto] Cedartrail and Dylan?

2013-06-20 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 10:26 -0700, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > > From: Tom Zanussi > > > > I actually used yocto-bsp to create a brand new cedartrail BSP, called > > meta-cdt, with just a vesa graphics machine called 'cdt-vesa': > > > > > http://git.

Re: [yocto] [meta-intel][PATCH] intel-gpu-tools: add new package

2013-06-25 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 17:43 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > This package contains numerous useful tools for working with Intel GPUs. Add > a > patch to install intel_panel_fitter as it's genuinely useful and not just a > debugging tool. > > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton Nice addition. Pulled into me

Re: [yocto] [meta-intel][PATCH] meta-nuc: don't install lms8 as NUC doesn't support AMT

2013-06-25 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 17:47 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > The NUC doesn't support Active Management Technology, so don't install lms8 as > part of the machine recommendations. > > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton Pulled into meta-intel/master. Thanks, Tom > --- > meta-nuc/conf/machine/nuc.conf |

Re: [yocto] [meta-intel][PATCH] lms8: handle different host setups

2013-06-25 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 17:45 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > The configure script looks at the *host* environment to decide where to > install > the init script, so it's location at packaging time can change. > > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton Pulled into meta-intel/master. Thanks, Tom > --- > commo

Re: [yocto] [Yocto] RFC: Image Creator and Config Creator, design thoughts

2011-04-22 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 09:05 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > I sat down with Josh earlier this week to discuss how I might use the > Image Creator in my development and to address any issues that might > pose as blockers to my finding such a tool useful. This led to various > feature discussions, scope

Re: [yocto] Personal git repositories

2011-04-26 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 20:00 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > git.yoctoproject.org hosts a number of different repositories, some of > which host limited user contributions (such as poky-contrib). These > repositories are setup and administered by a yoctoproject.org system admin. > > As our developer ba

Re: [yocto] Personal git repositories

2011-04-26 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 21:53 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > On 04/26/2011 09:39 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 20:00 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > >> git.yoctoproject.org hosts a number of different repositories, some of > >> which host limited us

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] Add emenlow pieces removed from oe-core

2011-05-06 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 05:45 -0700, Paul Eggleton wrote: > From: Paul Eggleton > > This adds back the emenlow-specific pieces recently removed from oe-core. > > Thanks, > Paul Eggleton Acked-by: Tom Zanussi Pulled into meta-intel/master. Thanks, Paul! > --- >

Re: [yocto] about how to port YOCTO

2011-05-16 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 07:19 -0700, Pedro Sanchez wrote: > On 05/16/2011 03:10 AM, Yu Ke wrote: > > on 2011-5-16 11:31, wangyang wrote: > >> Hello! > >> > >> Because YOCTO supports x86, arm and so on MCU. I just want to know > >> about how to > >> port YOCTO to other MCU. Is it difficult, what's kin

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] README.sources: use git.yoctoproject.org as server for the BSP repository

2011-05-17 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 11:27 -0700, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > --- Thanks for noticing and updating this! Pulled into meta-intel/master. Tom > meta-crownbay/README.sources |2 +- > meta-emenlow/README.sources |2 +- > meta-fishriver/README.source

[yocto] [PATCH 0/1] meta-intel: add MAINTAINERS file

2011-05-17 Thread Tom Zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git Branch: tzanussi/maintainers-init Browse: http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=tzanussi/maintainers-init Thanks, Tom Zanussi --- Tom Zanussi (1): meta-intel: add top-level MAINTAINERS file

[yocto] [PATCH 1/1] meta-intel: add top-level MAINTAINERS file

2011-05-17 Thread Tom Zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi To help people figure out where to send patches, report problems, and ask questions relating to BSPs in the meta-intel repo. Based on the linux-kernel MAINTAINERS file, but pared way down for simplicity. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- MAINTAINERS | 64

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] Add SMP support to crownbay.

2011-05-19 Thread Tom Zanussi
Hi Marc, Thanks for the patch - it looks good. Could I get you to reply with your Signed-off-by: though? e.g. something like: Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi but with your info. Thanks, Tom On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 11:00 -0700, Marc Ferland wrote: > This patch fixes Yocto BUG #1015. It a

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] Add SMP support to crownbay.

2011-05-19 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 13:03 -0700, Marc Ferland wrote: > Signed-off-by: Marc Ferland > Pushed to meta-intel/master, thanks! Tom ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

[yocto] [PATCH 0/2] meta-sugarbay: master update

2011-05-20 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi A couple update to reflect changes in master. The following changes since commit 54a572b1d4d4bfd018fc969cc2a4e1c3ba66bb39: Marc Ferland (1): Add SMP support to crownbay. are available in the git repository at: git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-intel.git tzanussi

[yocto] [PATCH 2/2] meta-sugarbay: remove xserver-xf86-dri-lite bbappend

2011-05-20 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi This is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- .../xserver-xf86-dri-lite_1.9.3.bbappend |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta-sugarbay/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xf86-dri-lite_1.9.3.bbappend diff

[yocto] [PATCH 1/2] meta-sugarbay: remove PREFERRED_VERSION settings

2011-05-20 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi There's no reason to specify these. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- meta-sugarbay/conf/machine/sugarbay.conf |6 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-sugarbay/conf/machine/sugarbay.conf b/meta-sugarbay/conf/machine/sugarbay

Re: [yocto] In consistancy in the defition of BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf

2011-05-25 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 18:17 -0700, Jeremy Puhlman wrote: > Opps sent from wrong account. > > I was working with some layerinfo code, and I noticed that the values of > BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf in the meta-intel repo are kind of all over > the map: > > for each in */conf/layer.conf; do c

[yocto] [PATCH 0/1] meta-intel BBFILE_COLLECTIONS fixups

2011-05-26 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi This fixes a problem with BBFILE_COLLECTIONS reported by Jeremy Puhlman. The following changes since commit 1b227f8ed2df529cc13f7169b0c08ff3d0f8c812: Tom Zanussi (1): meta-sugarbay: remove xserver-xf86-dri-lite bbappend are available in the git repository at: git

[yocto] [PATCH 1/1] meta-intel: fix BBFILE_COLLECTIONS overrides

2011-05-26 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi Several BBFILE_COLLECTIONS assignments in the layer.confs for these meta-intel layers added unwanted machine overrides, resulting in truncated values for this variable - remove them. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- meta-crownbay/conf/layer.conf |4 ++-- meta-fishriver

[yocto] [PATCH 0/1] meta-sugarbay: Change README build instructions to prefer tarballs

2011-05-26 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi This changes the build instructions in the README for the Sugar Bay BSP to use tarballs instead of git clones. This fixes the issue reported for YOCTO 1103 at least as far as the README in the BSP for the Sugar Bay goes. The release notes on the Yocto website would still need

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >