On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 16:09 -0700, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > > From: Tom Zanussi > > > > On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 20:50 +0100, Chris Tapp wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On 18 Jun 2013, at 15:04, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 16:56 -0700, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > > > >> I've been using the Intel meta-cedartrail layer with > > Danny 8.0.1. Is this > > > >> layer likely to be unusable with Dylan 9.0? Or unusable > > without lots of > > > >> tinkering that's probably beyond my abilities? > > > >> > > > >> And if I were to try Dylan, is it best to start from > > scratch, in a > > > >> completely new directory? > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I believe the main problem would be the graphics driver - > > it would need > > > > porting to the 3.8 kernel - the rest would probably be > > straightforward. > > > > > > > > The cedartrail BSP was discontinued following danny, but > > I'm cc:ing the > > > > maintainers in case they might have any further input. > > > > > > > > I was thinking of creating a meta-intel/staging area for > > things like > > > > this i.e. discontinued BSPs that people are still using, > > which would > > > > contain best-effort updates but completely without > > promise of any kind > > > > of support. If there's enough interest, and there seems > > to be judging > > > > from the number of questions about cedartrail we continue to keep > > > > getting, I'll try to find some free time to take a stab > > at moving it to > > > > dylan... > > > > > > I'm certainly interested and happy to help out if I can. > > > > > > I also see that ASRock are now making a board > > (http://www.asrock.com/IPC/overview.asp?Model=DN2800MT) that > > looks exactly the same as the Intel one with the same name > > aimed at signage and thin-client applications, so hardware > > will be about for a good few years yet, > > > > > > > OK, good to know. The only Cedar Trail hardware I have > > access to is the > > Acer Aspire One I have here - let me see if I can get > > something going on > > that... > > My first attempt to build cedartrail-nopvr finds that meta-intel has an > unmatched mesa_9.1.3.bbappend, but I suppose I can configure it to ignore > that since I'm not building graphics. However, meta-cedartrail contains an > unmatched linux-yocto_3.0.bbappend and linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend. I don't > know how to fix that. >
You should just be able to delete those 3.0 .bbappends - they're of no use at this point. I actually used yocto-bsp to create a brand new cedartrail BSP, called meta-cdt, with just a vesa graphics machine called 'cdt-vesa': http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel-contrib/log/?h=tzanussi/meta-cdt-v0 It built fine here, but it wouldn't boot on my Aspire One, but I couldn't boot either of the official 'danny' cedartrail (cedartrail and cedartrail-nopvr) images I built either. I'd be curious if the meta-cdt layer would work for you, though. Tom _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
