Hello everyone,
I will soon be receiving a Beaglebone and I wish to transfer the work I
have been doing with Yocto on the Beagleboard over to the Beaglebone, to
show my company how the same application codebase can be run different
platforms using Linux/Yocto/etc..
I have been looking at the
Op 26 jan. 2012, om 12:06 heeft Jack Mitchell het volgende geschreven:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I will soon be receiving a Beaglebone and I wish to transfer the work I have
> been doing with Yocto on the Beagleboard over to the Beaglebone, to show my
> company how the same application codebase ca
On 26/01/12 12:00, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 26 jan. 2012, om 12:06 heeft Jack Mitchell het volgende geschreven:
Hello everyone,
I will soon be receiving a Beaglebone and I wish to transfer the work I have
been doing with Yocto on the Beagleboard over to the Beaglebone, to show my
company how the
On 2012-01-26 05:01, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 26/01/12 12:00, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 26 jan. 2012, om 12:06 heeft Jack Mitchell het volgende geschreven:
Hello everyone,
I will soon be receiving a Beaglebone and I wish to transfer the work I have
been doing with Yocto on the Beagleboard over to t
On 2012-01-26 05:35, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 05:01, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 26/01/12 12:00, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 26 jan. 2012, om 12:06 heeft Jack Mitchell het volgende geschreven:
Hello everyone,
I will soon be receiving a Beaglebone and I wish to transfer the work I have
been doin
On 26/01/12 13:27, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 05:35, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 05:01, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 26/01/12 12:00, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 26 jan. 2012, om 12:06 heeft Jack Mitchell het volgende geschreven:
Hello everyone,
I will soon be receiving a Beaglebone and I wish
On 2012-01-26 06:50, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 26/01/12 13:27, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 05:35, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 05:01, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 26/01/12 12:00, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 26 jan. 2012, om 12:06 heeft Jack Mitchell het volgende geschreven:
Hello everyone,
I wil
On 2012-01-26 07:06, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 06:50, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 26/01/12 13:27, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 05:35, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 05:01, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 26/01/12 12:00, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 26 jan. 2012, om 12:06 heeft Jack Mitchell het volg
On 2012-01-26 08:07, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 07:06, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 06:50, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 26/01/12 13:27, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 05:35, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 05:01, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 26/01/12 12:00, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 26 jan. 20
On 26/01/12 15:24, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 08:07, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 07:06, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 06:50, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 26/01/12 13:27, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 05:35, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 05:01, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 26/01/12
I grabbed a bag of chips and a beverage ... watching this thread! I'm
right behind you guys so thanks for blazing the trail. I have other
TI parts to work with but starting with first BeagleBoard (&
BeagleBone) since that is the reference.
Regards,
Brian
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> add package-management to your image
> EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES_append_pn- = "
> package-management"
Hi Khem,
Just want to make sure I'm following you. In my local.conf I have:
EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES_append_pn-core-image-base = "package-management"
Update,
I'm still not doing something right. I did a clean rebuild of
core-image-base and a tar jtvf core-image-base-beagleboard.tar.bz2
reveals opkg stuff in /var/lib/opkg only. No opkg bin.
I guess I'm still in shock over this. I mean why should I have to do
anything other than:
PACKAGE_CLAS
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
> Update,
>
> I'm still not doing something right. I did a clean rebuild of
> core-image-base and a tar jtvf core-image-base-beagleboard.tar.bz2
> reveals opkg stuff in /var/lib/opkg only. No opkg bin.
>
> I guess I'm still in shock over t
I'm trying to understand the concept of creating a recipe and having it
included in the build I do.
For example, suppose I want to create the meta-intel/meta-cedartrail BSP
with the core-image-minimal image, but I wanted to include hello world
as shown in 3.1.2 Autotooled Package section of th
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> weather you want online (on device) package management is a different story
OK, I want to hear that story :)
Regards,
Brian
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.o
On Thursday 26 January 2012 11:36:31 Brian Hutchinson wrote:
> Update,
>
> I'm still not doing something right. I did a clean rebuild of
> core-image-base and a tar jtvf core-image-base-beagleboard.tar.bz2
> reveals opkg stuff in /var/lib/opkg only. No opkg bin.
>
> I guess I'm still in shock o
On 2012-01-26 09:36, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
Update,
I'm still not doing something right. I did a clean rebuild of
core-image-base and a tar jtvf core-image-base-beagleboard.tar.bz2
reveals opkg stuff in /var/lib/opkg only. No opkg bin.
I guess I'm still in shock over this. I mean why should
On 26/01/12 16:44, jfabernathy wrote:
I'm trying to understand the concept of creating a recipe and having
it included in the build I do.
For example, suppose I want to create the meta-intel/meta-cedartrail
BSP with the core-image-minimal image, but I wanted to include hello
world as shown in
From: Kishore Bodke
Hi,
The patch is for enabling the smp feature for the rt kernel build for the
Cedartrail BSP.
Please pull into master.
Thanks
Kishore.
The following changes since commit 3f86785a9a510773ca9eb7b31903f90ac78a297e:
meta-cedartrail: update linux-yocto-3.0 SRCREVs (2012-01
From: Kishore Bodke
Add smp feature to linux-yocto-rt_3.0.
Signed-off-by: Kishore Bodke
---
.../linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-cedartrail/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbapp
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2012-01-26 09:36, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
> Because you asked to build an absolutely minimal root file system.
> In this case, it's expected that you don't want to have opkg available.
> If you still want this very minimal system *and* opkg
On 01/26/2012 08:44 AM, jfabernathy wrote:
I'm trying to understand the concept of creating a recipe and having it
included in the build I do.
For example, suppose I want to create the meta-intel/meta-cedartrail BSP
with the core-image-minimal image, but I wanted to include hello world
as shown
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
> I'm not building minimal. I built core-image-minimal and it truly was
> minimal. Nothing in /usr/lib!
>
> Next I build core-image-base. Most of the Angstrom & Arago images
> I've build that were minimal-ish had opkg.
Every distro defi
On 01/26/2012 01:55 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 08:44 AM, jfabernathy wrote:
I'm trying to understand the concept of creating a recipe and having it
included in the build I do.
For example, suppose I want to create the meta-intel/meta-cedartrail BSP
with the core-image-minimal image,
On 01/26/2012 01:32 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 01:55 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 08:44 AM, jfabernathy wrote:
I'm trying to understand the concept of creating a recipe and having it
included in the build I do.
For example, suppose I want to create the meta-intel/meta-cedart
On 01/26/2012 04:38 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 01:32 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 01:55 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 08:44 AM, jfabernathy wrote:
I'm trying to understand the concept of creating a recipe and
having it
included in the build I do.
For example, suppo
On 01/26/2012 04:38 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 01:32 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 01:55 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 08:44 AM, jfabernathy wrote:
I'm trying to understand the concept of creating a recipe and
having it
included in the build I do.
For example, suppo
On 01/26/2012 02:04 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 04:38 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 01:32 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 01:55 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 08:44 AM, jfabernathy wrote:
I'm trying to understand the concept of creating a recipe and
having it
incl
On 01/26/2012 05:11 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 02:04 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 04:38 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 01:32 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 01:55 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 08:44 AM, jfabernathy wrote:
I'm trying to understand the co
On 2012-01-26 15:11, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 02:04 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 04:38 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 01:32 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 01:55 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 08:44 AM, jfabernathy wrote:
I'm trying to understand the conce
Folks,
Currently opkg-utils is hosted on svn.openmoko.org, that host seems to
be failing and is not a reliable upstream. We have a copy of opkg-utils
under git.yoctoproject.org (captured the last time svn.openmoko.org was
up). This move would also allow us to apply some pending patches.
W
On 01/26/2012 05:37 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 15:11, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 02:04 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 04:38 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 01:32 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 01:55 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 08:44 AM, jfabernath
On 2012-01-26 16:44, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 05:37 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 15:11, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 02:04 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 04:38 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 01:32 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 01:55 PM, Scott Garman w
On 01/26/2012 06:52 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 16:44, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 05:37 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 15:11, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 02:04 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 04:38 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 01:32 PM, jfabernathy wr
On 01/26/2012 05:12 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 06:52 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 16:44, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 05:37 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-26 15:11, Scott Garman wrote:
On 01/26/2012 02:04 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
On 01/26/2012 04:38 PM, Scott Garman wr
In support of a new BSP I've written two new recipes and appended to
another to depend on them. The new recipes files are not appearing in
the resulting images. I'm sure I'm overlooking something trivial, but
I'm not sure what it would be. The layer is available here:
http://git.yoctoproject.org/c
On 01/26/2012 05:29 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
In support of a new BSP I've written two new recipes and appended to
another to depend on them. The new recipes files are not appearing in
the resulting images. I'm sure I'm overlooking something trivial, but
I'm not sure what it would be. The layer is a
On 01/26/2012 05:42 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 01/26/2012 05:29 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>> In support of a new BSP I've written two new recipes and appended to
>> another to depend on them. The new recipes files are not appearing in
>> the resulting images. I'm sure I'm overlooking something trivia
On 01/26/2012 03:52 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
Any ideas as to why EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES += "hello" didn't add the
hello code to the final image?
EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES enables target *features*, not packages.
To get your package added, use this in local.conf
IMAGE_INSTALL += " hello "
Good catch.
40 matches
Mail list logo
