On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 12:10 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 11:28 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 10:58 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
> > > On 10/08/2015 10:40 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:09 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > > On Tue,
On 10/08/2015 11:28 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 10:58 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
>> On 10/08/2015 10:40 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:09 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:13:04PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 06/10/
On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 10:58 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 10:40 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:09 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:13:04PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > > > On 06/10/15 17:57, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > > Various p
On 10/08/2015 10:40 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:09 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:13:04PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 06/10/15 17:57, Wei Liu wrote:
Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't work.
Remove
>>>
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:09 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:13:04PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 06/10/15 17:57, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't work.
> > > Remove
> > > it for the benefit of xl feature developme
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:13:04PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 06/10/15 17:57, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't work. Remove
> > it for the benefit of xl feature development -- so that new features
> > won't need to worry about making this broken bi
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:06:57PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:57:26PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't work. Remove
> > it for the benefit of xl feature development -- so that new features
> > won't need to wo
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:57:26PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't work. Remove
> it for the benefit of xl feature development -- so that new features
> won't need to worry about making this broken binding happy.
>
> This isn't going to expose any
On 06/10/15 17:57, Wei Liu wrote:
> Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't work. Remove
> it for the benefit of xl feature development -- so that new features
> won't need to worry about making this broken binding happy.
>
> This isn't going to expose any user visible changes be
