On 10/08/2015 11:28 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 10:58 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote: >> On 10/08/2015 10:40 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:09 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:13:04PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>>>> On 06/10/15 17:57, Wei Liu wrote: >>>>>> Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't work. >>>>>> Remove >>>>>> it for the benefit of xl feature development -- so that new >>>>>> features >>>>>> won't need to worry about making this broken binding happy. >>>>>> >>>>>> This isn't going to expose any user visible changes because that >>>>>> module >>>>>> is not built by default. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> >>>>> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> >>>> >>>> And Zhigang mentioned to me offline that he is OK with these being >>>> gone too. >>> >>> Could we get a formal ack from one of you then please? >> >> I'm OK with removing libxl python bindings. > > Thanks, are you okay with me translating this into > > Acked-by: Zhigang Wang <zhigang.x.w...@oracle.com> > > in the final commit?
Yes. Acked-by: Zhigang Wang <zhigang.x.w...@oracle.com> Thanks, Zhigang _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
