On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 10:58 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote: > On 10/08/2015 10:40 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:09 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:13:04PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > > > On 06/10/15 17:57, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > > Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't work. > > > > > Remove > > > > > it for the benefit of xl feature development -- so that new > > > > > features > > > > > won't need to worry about making this broken binding happy. > > > > > > > > > > This isn't going to expose any user visible changes because that > > > > > module > > > > > is not built by default. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> > > > > > > And Zhigang mentioned to me offline that he is OK with these being > > > gone too. > > > > Could we get a formal ack from one of you then please? > > I'm OK with removing libxl python bindings.
Thanks, are you okay with me translating this into Acked-by: Zhigang Wang <zhigang.x.w...@oracle.com> in the final commit? > > Sorry I was intended to reply to all, but actually replied to Konrad > only. > > Thanks, > > Zhigang > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
