On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:09 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:13:04PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > On 06/10/15 17:57, Wei Liu wrote: > > > Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't work. > > > Remove > > > it for the benefit of xl feature development -- so that new features > > > won't need to worry about making this broken binding happy. > > > > > > This isn't going to expose any user visible changes because that > > > module > > > is not built by default. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> > > > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> > > And Zhigang mentioned to me offline that he is OK with these being > gone too.
Could we get a formal ack from one of you then please? > RIP python.. Just the (already broken) libxl bindings. The other ones remain (for now) and I'd be quite happy to see non-broken libxl bindings at some point. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
