On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 12:10 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 11:28 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 10:58 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
> > > On 10/08/2015 10:40 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:09 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > > On Tue,
On 10/08/2015 11:28 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 10:58 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
>> On 10/08/2015 10:40 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:09 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:13:04PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 06/10/
On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 10:58 -0400, Zhigang Wang wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 10:40 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:09 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:13:04PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > > > On 06/10/15 17:57, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > > Various p
On 10/08/2015 10:40 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:09 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:13:04PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 06/10/15 17:57, Wei Liu wrote:
Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't work.
Remove
>>>
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 15:09 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:13:04PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 06/10/15 17:57, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't work.
> > > Remove
> > > it for the benefit of xl feature developme
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:13:04PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 06/10/15 17:57, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't work. Remove
> > it for the benefit of xl feature development -- so that new features
> > won't need to worry about making this broken bi
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:06:57PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:57:26PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't work. Remove
> > it for the benefit of xl feature development -- so that new features
> > won't need to wo
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:57:26PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't work. Remove
> it for the benefit of xl feature development -- so that new features
> won't need to worry about making this broken binding happy.
>
> This isn't going to expose any
On 06/10/15 17:57, Wei Liu wrote:
> Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't work. Remove
> it for the benefit of xl feature development -- so that new features
> won't need to worry about making this broken binding happy.
>
> This isn't going to expose any user visible changes be
Various people say this binding doesn't compile or doesn't work. Remove
it for the benefit of xl feature development -- so that new features
won't need to worry about making this broken binding happy.
This isn't going to expose any user visible changes because that module
is not built by default.
10 matches
Mail list logo