flight 59932 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59932/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 12 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
test-amd64-i386-xl-
flight 59840 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59840/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 58581
test-amd64-i386-xl-qem
branch xen-unstable
xen branch xen-unstable
job test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm
test guest-saverestore
Tree: linux
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-xen-un
flight 59922 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59922/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 12 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
test-amd64-i386-xl-
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:42:14AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 09:08:39AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> There's one thing that I think is incomplete here. Currently, espfix
> >> triggers if SS points to the
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 09:08:39AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> There's one thing that I think is incomplete here. Currently, espfix
>> triggers if SS points to the LDT. It's possible for SS to point to
>> the LDT even with modify_ldt d
Currently, the event channel rebind code is gated with the presence of
the vector callback.
The virtual interrupt controller on ARM has the concept of per-CPU
interrupt (PPI) which allow us to support per-VCPU event channel.
Therefore there is no need of vector callback for ARM.
Xen is already us
The commit 6f6c15ef912465b3aaafe709f39bd6026a8b3e72 "xen/pvhvm: Remove
the xen_platform_pci int." makes the x86 version of
xen_pci_platform_unplug static.
Therefore we don't need anymore to define a dummy xen_pci_platform_unplug
for ARM.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
Cc: Stefano Stabellini
Cc: Ru
When using Linux >= 3.19 (commit 47591df) as dom0 on some Intel Ironlake
devices, It is possible to encounter graphics issues that make screen
unreadable or crash the system. It was reported in freedesktop bugzilla:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90037
As we still cannot find a prop
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 09:03:54AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Is that "default y" going to turn into a "default n" after a grace
> > period?
>
> Let's see how Willy's default-off sysctl plays out. In the long run,
> maybe we'll hav
On Sat, 2015-07-25 at 16:15 +, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 59908 qemu-mainline real [real]
> http://secure-web.cisco.com/1u4kwl1o3Dc6FDtVhFHrYLmyppwmEL8O6TSGGkDPdNzjeTSjZl_GhmvpBKlKsBPNbIlSfLqlqdopz-VgXgkCmm0eXivzV7hDeVfWv9mkXQPnQ3spzegDYYVfh9iHBe-wMTmd3XUQxuatfoS10LGCgDxQSm8sKxRqO4rl
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 09:08:39AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> There's one thing that I think is incomplete here. Currently, espfix
> triggers if SS points to the LDT. It's possible for SS to point to
> the LDT even with modify_ldt disabled, and there's a decent amount of
> attack surface the
Ian Campbell 於 西元2015年07月24日 16:57 寫道:
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 01:38 +0800, Ting-Wei Lan wrote:
Ian Campbell 於 西元2015年07月21日 23:10 寫道:
On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 00:15 +0800, Ting-Wei Lan wrote:
This all looks pretty good. One comment:
+if test "x$qemu_xen_path" = "x" || test "x$qemu_xen_path" =
"x
flight 59908 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59908/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 12 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
test-amd64-i386-xl-
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 09:50:52AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:44:52PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > I'm all for it, but I think it should be hard-disablable in config,
>> > too, for the -tiny people.
>>
>>
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:36:45PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> The modify_ldt syscall exposes a large attack surface and is
>> unnecessary for modern userspace. Make it optional.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski
>> ---
>> arch/x
flight 59907 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59907/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm 12 migrate-sup
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 09:50:52AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:44:52PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > I'm all for it, but I think it should be hard-disablable in config,
> > too, for the -tiny people.
>
> I totally agree.
>
> > If we add a runtime disable, let's do
flight 59837 linux-4.1 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59837/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm 13 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59393
test-amd64-i386-pair
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:36:45PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> The modify_ldt syscall exposes a large attack surface and is
> unnecessary for modern userspace. Make it optional.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 17 +
> arch/x86/
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:36:44PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> modify_ldt has questionable locking and does not synchronize
> threads. Improve it: redesign the locking and synchronize all
> threads' LDTs using an IPI on all modifications.
>
> This will dramatically slow down modify_ldt in mul
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:52:01PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I see your wide terminal and raise you a complete rewrite of that
> function. Sigh, why did I assume the old code was the right way to do
> it?
That's a mostly wrong assumption, as experience proves.
> Hah¸ we both missed it. Th
As well as CC-ing the correct people. I just saw such a request on
xen-users and thought this was worth clarifying here too.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell
---
MAINTAINERS | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index a4e64ea..156a95f 100
flight 59833 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59833/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 12 guest-localmigrate
fail REGR. vs. 59817
t
flight 59877 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59877/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 12 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
test-amd64-i386-xl-
flight 59898 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59898/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-pvops 5 kernel-build fail REGR. vs. 59254
build-i386-pvops
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:44:52PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I'm all for it, but I think it should be hard-disablable in config,
> too, for the -tiny people.
I totally agree.
> If we add a runtime disable, let's do a
> separate patch, and you and Kees can fight over how general it should
>
flight 59834 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59834/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm 12 migrate-sup
flight 59875 seabios real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59875/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stopfail REGR. vs. 59567
Tests which did not succeed, but a
29 matches
Mail list logo
