Guy, et al.
Thanks for your advise. I upgraded the subversion to the latest one
via MacPorts.
$ svn --version
svn, version 1.6.16 (r1073529)
and it now works fine! I've just filed my patch to Bugzilla.
Regards,
---
Motonori Shindo
2011/4/6 Guy Harris :
>
> On Apr 5, 2011, at 11:42 PM, Motono
Guy,
I must have installed the subversion using MacPorts a way back and
haven't upgraded it since then. This is most likely a problem caused
by the old subversion. I will bring up the subversion to the latest
one and see how it works. Thanks again!
Regards,
---
Motonori Shindo
2011/4/6 Guy Harr
On Apr 5, 2011, at 11:42 PM, Motonori Shindo wrote:
> Unn, that's weird. I simply did "svn diff" against the up-to-date SVN
> repository on MacOS X 10.6.7 with svn version 1.6.5 (r38866).
SVN 1.6.5 is older than the version of SVN that comes with 10.6.7:
$ sw_vers
ProductName:Mac OS X
Produ
Guy, Jaap, and Andres,
Unn, that's weird. I simply did "svn diff" against the up-to-date SVN
repository on MacOS X 10.6.7 with svn version 1.6.5 (r38866).
I will look into it further. Thank you all for your help.
Regards,
---
Motonori Shindo
2011/4/6 Guy Harris :
>
> On Apr 5, 2011, at 11:04 P
On Apr 5, 2011, at 11:04 PM, Motonori Shindo wrote:
> Anders,
>
> Ooops, my brain seems to stay in the days of 5 years ago, when we used
> to post patches on the dev mailing list. I will open the case in
> bugzilla. I don't know why the patch doesn't apply. I will check it.
Part of the problem
Anders,
Ooops, my brain seems to stay in the days of 5 years ago, when we used
to post patches on the dev mailing list. I will open the case in
bugzilla. I don't know why the patch doesn't apply. I will check it.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
---
Motonori Shindo
2011/4/6 Anders Broman :
> Motono
Motonori Shindo skrev 2011-04-06 06:55:
Hi,
Current NetFlow V9/IPFIX dissector treats IN_BYTES (IE=1) and
IN_PERMANENT_BYTES (IE=85) exactly in the same way. The same applies
to IN_PKTS (IE=2) and IN_PERMANENT_PKTS (IE=86). However,
IN_BYTES/IN_PKTS and IN_PERMANENT_BYTES/IN_PERMANENT_PKTS have
Hi,
This would normally have to go through Bugzilla, so to better track and comment
on patches. This patch for instance lacks line numbers.
--- epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c(revision 36487)
+++ epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c(working copy)
@@ -%ld,%ld +%ld,%ld @@
static int h
Hi,
Current NetFlow V9/IPFIX dissector treats IN_BYTES (IE=1) and
IN_PERMANENT_BYTES (IE=85) exactly in the same way. The same applies
to IN_PKTS (IE=2) and IN_PERMANENT_PKTS (IE=86). However,
IN_BYTES/IN_PKTS and IN_PERMANENT_BYTES/IN_PERMANENT_PKTS have
different semantics so they should be dist
