Guy, Jaap, and Andres, Unn, that's weird. I simply did "svn diff" against the up-to-date SVN repository on MacOS X 10.6.7 with svn version 1.6.5 (r38866).
I will look into it further. Thank you all for your help. Regards, --- Motonori Shindo 2011/4/6 Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu>: > > On Apr 5, 2011, at 11:04 PM, Motonori Shindo wrote: > >> Anders, >> >> Ooops, my brain seems to stay in the days of 5 years ago, when we used >> to post patches on the dev mailing list. I will open the case in >> bugzilla. I don't know why the patch doesn't apply. I will check it. > > Part of the problem appears to be that, as Jaap noticed, whatever generated > the patch failed to run a format string through printf or its equivalent: > > Index: epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c > =================================================================== > --- epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c (revision 36487) > +++ epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c (working copy) > @@ -%ld,%ld +%ld,%ld @@ > > ... > > That *looks* similar to the output of "svn diff"; I don't know what tool it > was, or why it appears not to have run "@@ -%ld,%ld +%ld,%ld @@" through > printf with the line numbers as arguments.... > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe > ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
