On Apr 5, 2011, at 11:04 PM, Motonori Shindo wrote:
> Anders,
>
> Ooops, my brain seems to stay in the days of 5 years ago, when we used
> to post patches on the dev mailing list. I will open the case in
> bugzilla. I don't know why the patch doesn't apply. I will check it.
Part of the problem appears to be that, as Jaap noticed, whatever generated the
patch failed to run a format string through printf or its equivalent:
Index: epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c
===================================================================
--- epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c (revision 36487)
+++ epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c (working copy)
@@ -%ld,%ld +%ld,%ld @@
...
That *looks* similar to the output of "svn diff"; I don't know what tool it
was, or why it appears not to have run "@@ -%ld,%ld +%ld,%ld @@" through printf
with the line numbers as arguments....
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
