Motonori Shindo skrev 2011-04-06 06:55:
Hi,
Current NetFlow V9/IPFIX dissector treats IN_BYTES (IE=1) and
IN_PERMANENT_BYTES (IE=85) exactly in the same way. The same applies
to IN_PKTS (IE=2) and IN_PERMANENT_PKTS (IE=86). However,
IN_BYTES/IN_PKTS and IN_PERMANENT_BYTES/IN_PERMANENT_PKTS have
different semantics so they should be distinguishable when they are
displayed or specified in a filter. Please find attached the patch
which does that.
Regards,
---
Motonori Shindo
You should attach your patch to a bug report at
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla
It does not apply though:
patching file epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c
patch: **** missing line number at line 5: @@ -%ld,%ld +%ld,%ld @@
Regards
Anders
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list<wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
