Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2017-06-26 Thread Guy Harris
On Apr 29, 2011, at 12:52 AM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:24:08PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: >> I wouldn't to it by checking for a particular version, though - >> I'd just check for inflatePrime() and, if it's not present, don't build in >> the "transparent access to gzippe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] linux package requirements for wireshark build

2017-06-26 Thread Guy Harris
On Jun 25, 2017, at 6:27 PM, Alan Partis wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jun 2017, Guy Harris wrote: > >> On Jun 25, 2017, at 5:29 PM, Alan Partis wrote: >> >>> $ list zlib* >>> Last metadata expiration check: 10:52:36 ago on Sat Jun 24 22:28:29 2017. >>> Installed Packages >>> zlib.i686

Re: [Wireshark-dev] linux package requirements for wireshark build

2017-06-26 Thread Maynard, Chris
The last line of tools/install_rpms_for_devel.sh is: echo "This tool has been obsoleted by tools/rpm-setup.sh" So would it be better to use tools/rpm-setup.sh instead? Whichever one is recommend, maybe it would be a good idea to mention it in the Wireshark developer’s guide, such as in Section

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark build failing with unresolved external symbols

2017-06-26 Thread Anders Broman
Linking with gnutls missing in cmake.txt? /Anders Den 26 juni 2017 21:03 skrev "Paul Offord" : > Hi, > > > > I have built a fresh git repo, pulled the master branch and then pulled > the code for Gerrit change 19666 - https://code.wireshark.org/ > review/#/c/19666/ > > > > My build is now failing

[Wireshark-dev] Wireshark build failing with unresolved external symbols

2017-06-26 Thread Paul Offord
Hi, I have built a fresh git repo, pulled the master branch and then pulled the code for Gerrit change 19666 - https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/19666/ My build is now failing with: 8> Creating library C:/Development/wsbuild64/run/Debug/wireshark.lib and object C:/Development/wsbuild64

Re: [Wireshark-dev] linux package requirements for wireshark build

2017-06-26 Thread Jeff Morriss
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 11:11 PM, Alan Partis wrote: > I've looked through the wireshark developer's guide, and google'd all > around, but cannot find a list of required packages for building > wireshark. If there is one, let me know. I generally just run `tools/install_rpms_for_devel.sh` to i

Re: [Wireshark-dev] If Wireshark is started with -i option it does not set wanted interface if the interface is a pipe

2017-06-26 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, I did a git bisect and this is the commit that broke it: wireshark -i /tmp/Vnfcscfv1_fee0_eth1_Oc2th -i /tmp/Vnfcscfv1_fee1_eth1_c6nZw -i /tmp/Vnfcscfv1_fee2_eth1_leNWM -i /tmp/Vnfcscfv1_fee3_eth1_F37Bh 40a5fb567a9bd1bb02d38ca33efe64392230d27d is the first bad commit commit 40a5fb567a9bd1bb0

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Building CORBA dissectors

2017-06-26 Thread Andy Ling
It depends when you think it got broken. I built a CORBA dissector using 2.2.5. I haven’t tried the latest build though. I’m using Windows 7. Generally I don’t actually use the idl2wrs script. I use commands based on it. So to generate the .c files I use something like.. C:\Python27\omniorb\omn

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Building CORBA dissectors

2017-06-26 Thread Michael Mann
I'm guessing you didn't get a response because no one is building CORBA dissectors outside of the 3 or 4 that are in the source tree. Those are generated with idl2wrs, but then the C output is part of source control (partially because I'm not sure all platforms could generate the C dissector a

[Wireshark-dev] Building CORBA dissectors

2017-06-26 Thread David Hagood
I've asked about this before, but gotten no responses: Has anybody tried to build a CORBA dissector from IDL with the current git head? It seems the idl2wrs program has been changed, and it no longer seems to be able to process IDL correctly. ___

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Including Qt5 libs in my plugin project

2017-06-26 Thread Paul Offord
Hi, How can I add the moc generation and QT5 library inclusions to the Makefile.am? Thanks and regards…Paul From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Pascal Quantin Sent: 24 June 2017 21:17 To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev