I'm guessing you didn't get a response because no one is building CORBA dissectors outside of the 3 or 4 that are in the source tree. Those are generated with idl2wrs, but then the C output is part of source control (partially because I'm not sure all platforms could generate the C dissector as part of the build process). If the CORBA dissectors that are currently in Wireshark source don't generate correctly, I can certainly take a look. But if you have "private" CORBA dissectors, we may need to chat offline if you can't share them publically. Otherwise the preferred solution would be to provide your CORBA dissector (and sample capture) in a bug report in Bugzilla.
Michael -----Original Message----- From: David Hagood <david.hag...@gmail.com> To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Sent: Mon, Jun 26, 2017 7:23 am Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Building CORBA dissectors I've asked about this before, but gotten no responses:Has anybody tried to build a CORBA dissector from IDL with the current git head? It seems the idl2wrs program has been changed, and it no longer seems to be able to process IDL correctly.___________________________________________________________________________Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-devUnsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
