On Apr 29, 2011, at 12:52 AM, Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames...@darkjames.pl> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:24:08PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: >> I wouldn't to it by checking for a particular version, though - >> I'd just check for inflatePrime() and, if it's not present, don't build in >> the "transparent access to gzipped files" support. > > Actually we still can do transparent access, but only when BLOCK is not inside > middle of byte. So does that mean "we can still do transparent access, but it won't work with some valid gzipped files", or does it mean "we can still do transparent access on all valid gzipped files as long as the code is careful", or does it mean "we can still do transparent access on all valid gzipped files, but it won't be as efficient as it would be with inflatePrime()"? Given that the random-access-to-gzipped-files code is compiled in regardless of whether we have inflatePrime(), presumably it doesn't mean the first of those. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
