Re: Wave in a Box progress report, December 13

2011-01-03 Thread John Blossom
The links to Apache Wave resources in this message are largely broken, as well as some key ones at the Apache project site.

Re: Wave in a Box progress report, December 13

2011-01-03 Thread John Blossom
Thanks, Dan, I think that the other links were due to a temporary router issue on my end, I see the same state you do now. Looking forward to the provisioning of the new page on the Apache site.

Hello

2013-05-23 Thread John Blossom
e for more full-blown implementation and propagation. Thanks! All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom

Re: Design & Documentation Contributions

2013-05-24 Thread John Blossom
All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Justin Beals wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been lurking on this list for a little bit and am really glad to see > some activity. I th

Re: Hello

2013-05-25 Thread John Blossom
. Presumed goodwill should be the order of the day for everyone in this process. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hello John, > > On Thu, May 2

Re: Hello

2013-05-25 Thread John Blossom
interested, but I want to make sure that this particular thread stays vital to develop a broader consensus on how to proceed within the Apache community. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:11

Re: Hello

2013-05-25 Thread John Blossom
uld, also. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Pratik Paranjape < pratikparanj...@gmail.com> wrote: > I had studied this point a while back, and for all practical purposes,

Re: Design & Documentation Contributions

2013-05-25 Thread John Blossom
omplement and amplify the Apache community's efforts. We have much to learn from all of you and look forward to building one big, beautiful and amazing Wave. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Sat, May 25, 2013

Re: Hello

2013-05-25 Thread John Blossom
forward with the protocol via the Apache community, which I am sure will welcome additional contributors. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Michael MacFadden < michael.mac

Re: Hello

2013-05-25 Thread John Blossom
Angus, Thanks so much to you and Michael, I appreciate your help with this transition. I am tapping on some requirements specs, when it's appropriate I would love to share them with this community. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+:

Moving Wave Forward

2013-05-28 Thread John Blossom
also be welcome. Thank you for your kind attention. I look forward to what you may have as thoughts regarding the future of Wave in response to this presentation. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom

Re: Moving Wave Forward

2013-05-28 Thread John Blossom
I'd like the Apache community to comment for now but I appreciate the sentiment. Best, J On May 28, 2013 5:24 PM, "Alain Levesque" wrote: > The slide deck should be extended to public. Bravo John > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:21 PM, John Blossom wrote: > > &

Re: Moving Wave Forward

2013-05-28 Thread John Blossom
g forward to additional input, let's keep the discussion moving. Thanks. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Upayavira wrote: > John, > > You've made some large scale

Re: Moving Wave Forward

2013-05-28 Thread John Blossom
how that might be able to be realized for Wave. Its conversational data model and potential for independent data ownership across multiple UIs and apps should be right in the thick of everything that's happening in the cloud and in the mobile Web. Thank you again, I look forward to continuing the conversation. Best, John Blossom > > Ali >

Re: Moving Wave Forward

2013-05-28 Thread John Blossom
to Apache servers, I am not sure exactly where this all stands. Who might be the best person to engage on these sorts of questions? John On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:23 PM, John Blossom wrote: > Thank you, Ali, for your thoughtful comments. I have some responses below > (which would loo

Re: Moving Wave Forward

2013-05-28 Thread John Blossom
to address the huge opportunities that those requirements present. Thanks, John On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Dave wrote: > John, > > I'm not a committer, but I have some familiarity with the wave stack. > > > On 29/05/13 01:23, John Blossom wrote: > >> People need t

Re: Moving Wave Forward

2013-05-28 Thread John Blossom
ceiving seem to confirm where the > >architecture needs to adapt to modern requirements and performance > >expectations. Hopefully we can all work together to address the huge > >opportunities that those requirements present. > > > >Thanks, > > > >John > > >

Re: Moving Wave Forward

2013-05-28 Thread John Blossom
_client_ (supporting off-line access etc.) doesn't exist > yet. > > Over the years there have been a few discussions about formalising the > client/server protocols within wiab - but so far there hasn't been the > manpower to implement it. > > > Dave > > >

Re: Moving Wave Forward

2013-05-29 Thread John Blossom
Bruno, Thanks so much for sharing your experience. No doubt there is someone who has succeeded with federation and uses it, but I cannot think of anyone offhand. The existing commercially oriented products don't use it, AFAIK. Especially if some form of federation powers peer-to-peer mobile sharin

Re: Moving Wave Forward

2013-05-29 Thread John Blossom
rojects best interests. Again > > if > > >> we have a roadmap and people who feel strongly about working on those > > >> areas, we can divide and concours. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for acknowledging > > > this > &g

Re: Moving Wave Forward

2013-05-29 Thread John Blossom
ebase is largely a proof of concept. It has some > > > >> potential, but I think most of us would agree that some time spent > > > >> re-architecting how we want things to work and morphing the code > base > > > into > > > >> that (or rewriti

Re: Moving Wave Forward

2013-05-29 Thread John Blossom
ill use the lib. This gives client developers a lot more > options. > > The only downside would be ports would be need to be made for Native > clients. But thats pretty unavoidable whatever we do. > > > > On 29 May 2013 16:59, John Blossom wrote: > > > Thomas, > &

Re: Moving Wave Forward

2013-05-29 Thread John Blossom
t be made in > > Javascript. > > GWT clients would have to make a wrapper for it (but this is a easy > task), > > meanwhile by having the library j/s means people not wanting to use GWT > for > > web apps can still use the lib. This gives client developers a lot more > &

Re: Moving Wave Forward

2013-05-29 Thread John Blossom
e: > On Wed, May 29, 2013, at 05:06 PM, John Blossom wrote: > > Michael, > > > > Sounds like we're all starting to sync up on this bit by bit. The > > SMTP/IMAP > > analogy is correct, though with different services, of course. > > > > I am certai

Re: Moving Wave Forward

2013-05-29 Thread John Blossom
ogether to make it happen. If I can be of service to this effort, that is good. Best, John On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Upayavira wrote: > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013, at 07:04 PM, John Blossom wrote: > > Upayavira, > > > > You raise a very interesting point with Op

Re: Moving Wave Forward

2013-05-29 Thread John Blossom
Thanks very much, Ali, this is very interesting information. It would seem to be very important for being able to communicate clearly to people about Apache Wave's management that it is completely free of all potential encumbrances from Google. Otherwise, that may set up a negative psychology in po

NodeJS for Sever-Side Wave Code

2013-05-29 Thread John Blossom
Hello, Looking through some documentation on Wave-derived products, I am seeing that there is some good use of Node.JS coding for server-side functions. Why would it not be appropriate to replace some or all of the demo-model code from Google on the server side with a light and powerful language s

Re: NodeJS for Sever-Side Wave Code

2013-05-30 Thread John Blossom
27;s a part of the ASF spirit, I know. But I don't want success by accident. I want success by design. So yes, we need committers. For what? Solve for x. Thanks, John Blossom On May 30, 2013 5:55 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Bruno

Re: NodeJS for Sever-Side Wave Code

2013-05-30 Thread John Blossom
like renaming packages and module structure and there was > little to no feedback from the community. This was more than enough for (at > least) me to think there was no common interest in what me and Michael were > doing and therefore I stopped. > > > Perhaps > > then we re

Re: NodeJS for Sever-Side Wave Code

2013-05-30 Thread John Blossom
sayin'. John All the best, John Blossom On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Thomas Wrobel wrote: > Is there any suggested way to organize volunteers? > > I know the current method is basically a "todo" list isnt it? which is fine > in itself. > But possibly havin

Re: Mailing Lists vs Wave

2013-05-30 Thread John Blossom
email server with Wave for collaborative communications whilst synchronising with those who are still on email servers and b) I don't have to duplicate data sets to get more value - I just use different components of a given wave, sometimes with other UIs. All the best, John Blossom On Thu, May 3

New Vision Pitch Script

2013-05-31 Thread John Blossom
, John Blossom Today's Web is changing like it never has before. More than a billion people use it today and a billion more will be using it in just a few years - mostly on mobile devices. Those Web users will live in a world that is being transformed by the mobile Web. Trillions of sensors

Re: wave test server

2013-05-31 Thread John Blossom
Thomas, That certainly seems like the right paradigm. J On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Thomas Wrobel wrote: > At the moment, I think so yes. I dont think its possible to communicate > directly with any arbitrary Wave server like you can with a email server. > > I think, untill we have that cli

Invitation to On-Air Hangout

2013-06-02 Thread John Blossom
June and will be recorded on YouTube. Event link: https://plus.google.com/events/cboctmpnt5503f0km2b0s5iritk It would be great if committers who participated in this release could join in the discussion so that we can all celebrate this milestone and the future of Wave. Thanks! John Blossom

Re: Invitation to On-Air Hangout

2013-06-03 Thread John Blossom
Hi, Just reminding folks of our On-Air Hangout tomorrow, if you have some time please join us for the discussion, event page at: https://plus.google.com/events/cboctmpnt5503f0km2b0s5iritk All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com

Re: Wave Logo

2013-06-04 Thread John Blossom
That does seem to be the one that's referenced in the rights page. I am not sure where they stand in clarifying the rights ownership transfer with Google, but either way it seems to be the right one. All the best, John Blossom at 6:20 AM, Yuri Z wrote: > Yep, I think we have rights

Re: Wave Logo

2013-06-05 Thread John Blossom
en a legal document > should be in someone's archive. > > Wave On. > > http://alfredo.abambres.com > > *"Moving, always moving, and living inside movement". Rainer Maria Rilke* > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:10 PM, John Blossom wrote: > > >

Re: Community mailing list?

2013-06-05 Thread John Blossom
How about platform@ ? On Jun 5, 2013 4:59 PM, "Upayavira" wrote: > Except, this isn't for users of WIAB, it is for general discussion about > Wave, so user@ doesn't really fit. There are other general@ lists, so > there's precedence there. > > The other issue though, is that mailing lists work wh

Re: Invitation to On-Air Hangout

2013-06-05 Thread John Blossom
ld personally love to > see/hear > >> > tomorrow: > >> > Besides Christian, I think Upayavira, Ali Lown (the person leading the > >> > release of 0.4 version) and Yuri Zelikov (the only maintainer I know > of > >> a *sort > >> > of* publ

Re: Wave Logo

2013-06-05 Thread John Blossom
t; can do with it. It is important to recognise that logos are kind of a > special case in open source. > > Upayavira > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 02:23 PM, John Blossom wrote: > > Copyright is claimed for the logo by Google but the word Wave is too > > generic and u

Re: Community mailing list?

2013-06-06 Thread John Blossom
t dozens of e-mails just because of logo stuff > > and such, no matter how important the subject is. And yes, I can use > > filters, but still they're not perfect and are PITA to maintain. > > > > PP > > > > On Jun 6, 2013, at 1:58 PM, "John Blossom - Sh

Re: Urgent, Wavers! Reporting time TODAY

2013-06-08 Thread John Blossom
Not sure what needs to be done but let me know if I can help. J On Jun 8, 2013 3:02 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" wrote: > Hello, > > please see below - changing the subject for better visibility. > > Cheers > Christian > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Upayavira > Date: Sat, Jun

Re: Urgent, Wavers! Reporting time TODAY

2013-06-10 Thread John Blossom
Looks like this was covered, sorry for the delay. I understand the procedure, now. Thanks, John On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hello, > > please see below - changing the subject for better visibility. > > Cheers > Christian > > > -- Forwarded message --

Re: Wave Future Options

2013-06-12 Thread John Blossom
we have the core of a community that can help us to move in that direction. I will weigh in on the "how" from time to time, but overall I am most interested in the "x" - it's your solution. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: h

Re: Wave Future Options

2013-06-12 Thread John Blossom
micro-optimizations and obfuscation which practically, > manually can't be done > > 2) Except for Webworkers, everything in HTML5 can be used in GWT. I am > using it, I am sure others are using them too. Even webworkers are usable, > but its not as straightforward. > > >

Re: Wave Future Options

2013-06-12 Thread John Blossom
I agree, Joseph, just trying to give you a target to shoot at. I am here to help you gain a market, and hopefully your decisions are market-worthy. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:08 PM

Re: A Call To Developers

2013-06-12 Thread John Blossom
this thread. I hope that this energy can be channeled towards maximum market impact. I don't want Wave to be just great - I want it to rock the world, top to bottom. All the best, John Blossom On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: A Call To Developers

2013-06-13 Thread John Blossom
Github+Apache+Wave=awesomeness. John On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Scott Wilson < scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12 Jun 2013, at 22:08, Upayavira wrote: > > > All I can say is, "well said". We need to consider Wave as a young > > project - one that really doesn't yet have anyt

Re: A Call To Developers

2013-06-14 Thread John Blossom
own right, having at least a mirror of the code in that environment certainly can't hurt. All the best, John Blossom On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, John Blossom wrote: > > Github+Apache+Wave=awesomeness. > > &g

Re: Future of Apache wave [Was: Re: Advantages of P2P messaging?]

2013-06-14 Thread John Blossom
Michael, Joseph, I am reading this part of the thread with great interest. It sounds as is the OT paradigms that you and Joseph are suggesting might support different types of formats for different messages/blips within a common document/wavelet. That would seem to be an important objective, poten

Re: A Call To Developers

2013-06-14 Thread John Blossom
Christian, You're preaching to the choir. I understand clearly. John On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:46 PM, John Blossom wrote: > > Christian, > > > > I leave it up to the developers to make those decisions. W

Re: Adding experiments into the repository

2013-06-14 Thread John Blossom
Sounds like a good idea to have multiple experiments moving forward. Lots of great ideas floating around now that are worth trying out. Fast-fail is the order of the day for the moment, which should allow us to decide things such as what goes on which side of the API, etc. John On Fri, Jun 14, 201

Re: A Call To Developers

2013-06-15 Thread John Blossom
Christian, Thanks for clarifying this. One of the factors which I hope that the developers new to Apache consider is that just because one calls their product open source does not mean that you have the resources to manage an open source program in a way that will lead to successful product implem

Wave and OpenOffice

2013-06-15 Thread John Blossom
s, it's a sub-project that may help to attract more developers to Wave technologies. All the best, John Blossom

Re: Wave and OpenOffice

2013-06-15 Thread John Blossom
does this, but i kept > going back to wave because it was actually more responsive, featurefull, > and actually crashed less. > > > > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 9:29 AM, John Blossom wrote: > > > I had the down-the-road thought just now that I wanted to put into > >

Re: Wave and OpenOffice

2013-06-16 Thread John Blossom
o a front facing page to share with people > >>who > >> > didnt feel like registering on my wave server. > >> > > >> > an openoffice for wave would be extremely usefull, and could have an > >> > extremely large impact imo. wave is also already

Re: OpenOffice and Wave

2013-06-16 Thread John Blossom
Thanks, Rob, it seems that this opens up interesting doors for down-the-road variants of OpenOffice based on Wave editing models and data models. The challenge and the opportunity is that Wave's OT model acts on the body of a document, so conversations and collaborations can become the body of a mo

Re: A Call To Developers

2013-06-16 Thread John Blossom
: > > Totally agree with all, we need to get better and do more to just became > > bigger and better. > > > > > > 2013/6/15 John Blossom > > > >> Christian, > >> > >> Thanks for clarifying this. One of the factors which I hope that the

Re: FW: OpenOffice and Wave

2013-06-16 Thread John Blossom
ve is not necessarily the same in terms of data models. All the best, John Blossom On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > Adding Svante Schubert to the thread, from the ODF Toolkit project. > He also chairs the subcommittee at OASIS that has been looking at OT > for change t

Re: OpenOffice and Wave

2013-06-16 Thread John Blossom
ick a number. John All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Joseph Gentle wrote: > Sounds interesting. Where is this going to be held? It might be > interesting for a few people o

Re: OpenOffice and Wave

2013-06-17 Thread John Blossom
lusive. > Therefore, please use them with restraint, and keep as much discussion, > and all decisions, here on the list. > > Thanks! Upayavira > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013, at 01:37 PM, John Blossom - Shore Communications > Inc. wrote: > > In-person would be great. I am NYC/Bo

Re: Wave and OpenOffice

2013-06-17 Thread John Blossom
>>> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> @Fleeky, Yuri actually added some > > > > >>>> code< > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > &g

Re: wiab server overview diagram

2013-06-18 Thread John Blossom
Thanks for the diagram, Dave, it helps me to visualize Wave's components. How much is the "wave bus" a reality as opposed to a potential division in programming? That is, in terms of how one binds/opens the bus, does it really function as an API. John Blossom On Sun, Jun 16, 2

Re: A Very Wavey Plan (P2P!)

2013-06-19 Thread John Blossom
Joseph, This is exactly the sort of transformational architecture that I have been hoping that you and others would pursue. Being fundamentally P2P but readily adaptable for scalable client-server architecture seems to fit today's mobile Web well. The three options that you outline might not wind

Re: IRC discussion on P2P waving

2013-06-21 Thread John Blossom
ncy issues will not be so severe. Things to think about, I will look at this more carefully later today. All the best, John Blossom On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak) < sten...@gmail.com> wrote: > Following Joseph's "A Very Wavey Plan (P2P!)" thre

Re: A Very Wavey Plan (P2P!)

2013-06-21 Thread John Blossom
Glad to participate as requested, though this is primarily the developers' discussion. John B On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Upayavira wrote: > Perfect. > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 03:57 AM, Michael MacFadden wrote: > > Upayavira, > > > > > > We will put a wiki page together. We will also h

Re: Demo Server

2013-06-22 Thread John Blossom
Thanks so much, Michael, that's a great help. If we can get some funding for Wave project development perhaps some of the funding can be reserved for open source hosting services on an ongoing basis via a nonprofit entity. All the best, John Blossom On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Mi

Re: Joining as a Mentor

2013-06-22 Thread John Blossom
I've appreciated your help and insight, glad to have you aboard. Best, John On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hello Wave'rs, > > as you might know, I am Apache Member and involved in various > projects. I also have mentored a bunch of podlings, like for example > Open

Re: IRC discussion on P2P waving

2013-06-22 Thread John Blossom
a, in order to "open the eyes" of those drawn to this mailing > >list, might it be beneficial to build up a wiki page of accepted use > >cases so that everyone can read them and take them into account when > >considering different ideas? That'd facilitate discussio

Re: IRC discussion on P2P waving

2013-06-22 Thread John Blossom
y wasn't possible to > >communicate between two browsers without a sever between them. > > > >or does p2p mean something different in this context? > > > >On 22 June 2013 18:53, John Blossom wrote: > >> Michael, > >> > >> I like that way

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Wave Sub Committees

2013-06-24 Thread John Blossom
It's perhaps superficial, but if you call these "working groups" then perhaps that takes away some of the hoop-jumping perception. These are sub-communities which try to attract people who can help to solve specific problems. I like the scheme. On Joseph's point 1a, I think that it would be accept

Re: Delving into OT

2013-06-25 Thread John Blossom
we're to support history/playback readily, but I suppose that's the fun of the challenge. If we crack with with P2P in tow, then we've really got something. All the best, John Blossom On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Joseph Gentle wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Ali L

Re: Joining as a Mentor

2013-06-25 Thread John Blossom
Thank you! Glad to have your help. BTW, how does one add oneself to be an editor of the wiki? Anyone? Thanks. John Blossom On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Thanks all! > > I have subscribed myself now > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 6:45 PM, John

Re: Joining as a Mentor

2013-06-25 Thread John Blossom
Michael, I do have a confluence login on the Apache Wave wiki, thanks for your help All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com>

Re: John's Wiki Permissions

2013-06-27 Thread John Blossom
Thank you, Michael, for my new vast, cosmic powers! ;-) On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > John, > > I have given you wiki permissions! > > ~Michael > > >

Update on Potential Projects for Apache Wave Software

2013-06-28 Thread John Blossom
Hello, As some of you may be aware, one of the platforms from which I am advocating for the renewal of Apache Wave development is to devise communications that will be well-configured for "the next billion people" coming online. The specific project that I am starting to gear up towards this end i

Re: Delving into OT

2013-07-08 Thread John Blossom
Ingenious, Torben, certainly adds efficiency. John On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Torben Weis wrote: > 2013/6/25 Joseph Gentle > > > > > >> When peers connect, they send each other missing ops. Figuring out > > >> which ops are missing can be surprisingly tricky - but we'll figure > > >> that

A New Committer

2013-07-08 Thread John Blossom
ys glad to communicate in this channel as project protocol requires, as well as other channels which may help to accelerate the efficiency of this channel. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom

Re: A New Committer

2013-07-08 Thread John Blossom
Ali, Thanks so much, thoughts below. Best, John On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Ali Lown wrote: > Heh. This saves us having to write an [ANNOUNCE] for you... > FIRST! Tee hee. > > > One key thing that I'd like to chip away at is getting our Web presences > > sussed out a bit more. Web sites/ow

Re: Feedback from Incubator Vote

2013-07-16 Thread John Blossom
Especially in the latter case of developing nations - but also for mobile users in general - enabling offline modes with synchronisation after an indefinite period is a must. John All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom

Re: Delving into OT

2013-07-16 Thread John Blossom
iting announcements fairly soon. Time to change the world with Wave!!! All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Joseph Gentle wrote: > I've had a busy few weeks - gearing up to launch o

Re: Delving into OT

2013-07-17 Thread John Blossom
Great, Michael, find a date that works for you that seems to match with others' interests and I will be glad to arrange for this. We can have the link available but not make public, if that helps to encourage constructive participation. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com

Re: Delving into OT

2013-07-18 Thread John Blossom
., ET is UTC+4 right now. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > I agree that another hangout sounds fun. > > John, how about setting up a Doodle for us to m

Re: Delving into OT

2013-07-23 Thread John Blossom
le of invitees. I Have Joseph's ID already and I believe Ali and Michael also, but if you have a doubt, just send it along. If you don't make the hangout itself, I will be sure to share the link here for the common record. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511

Re: Delving into OT

2013-07-23 Thread John Blossom
1200 ET, btw - bad math. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:53 AM, John Blossom wrote: > OK, the consensus time/date for the hangout seems to be Wednesday, 31 > July, 1600 UTC (10

Re: Reminder: it should happen on-list (regarding upcoming Google Hangout)

2013-07-23 Thread John Blossom
events comments to clarify the context. I am hoping that this will be sufficient - the listserv itself is not the most effective meeting scheduler. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:44 AM

Re: Reminder: it should happen on-list (regarding upcoming Google Hangout)

2013-07-23 Thread John Blossom
best ways to use a tool like Google Hangouts effectively that fits in with project guidelines. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi folks, > >

Re: Reminder: it should happen on-list (regarding upcoming Google Hangout)

2013-07-23 Thread John Blossom
I am all in for that, Joseph, absolutely. The sooner that we get a project/Apache consensus for "eating our own dogfood," the better. Apache Wave has the potential to become a killer project management tool. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 goog

Re: Reminder: it should happen on-list (regarding upcoming Google Hangout)

2013-07-23 Thread John Blossom
ching developers and tech product teams. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Joseph Gentle wrote: > Speaking of which, I'd like to start actually using wave in this > community.

Re: Reminder: it should happen on-list (regarding upcoming Google Hangout)

2013-07-23 Thread John Blossom
forward to more visibility and awareness. That will help to attract more developers, projects, etc. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro wrote: > I also supp

Re: Delving into OT

2013-07-24 Thread John Blossom
Thanks, Michael, Ali, if you could please confirm that you'll be able to attend, that would be great. Any concerns, please don't hesitate to bring them up now, thanks. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom O

Re: Reminder: it should happen on-list (regarding upcoming Google Hangout)

2013-07-25 Thread John Blossom
Yes, Joseph, the goal is to use the disciplines of Apache open source development to build a platform that will rock the world. The disciplines are important, but a sustainable, maintainable platform is the real goal that the disciplines facilitate. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos

Re: Delving into OT

2013-07-29 Thread John Blossom
Michael, will you be able to join us on the Hangout this Wednesday? All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks l

Re: Reminder: it should happen on-list (regarding upcoming Google Hangout)

2013-07-29 Thread John Blossom
Yes, the community needs to buy in to common communication. That said, everyone's invited to view or participate in Wednesday's Hangout and the results will be posted here, just as with any other interaction in the project. All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail

Apache Wave Hangout - Link to Episode One

2013-07-31 Thread John Blossom
know that a Hangout is the place to solve that, this is probable the best place to start. In the meantime, I will be glad to help create a new "office hours" event on Hangout and have people decide what they want to discuss. Thanks to everyone who participated, the logistics seem to have

Apache Wave Google+ Account

2013-07-31 Thread John Blossom
t and links to the official project Web site. Thoughts? It's very easy to set up, BTW. All the best, John Blossom

Re: Apache Wave Google+ Account

2013-07-31 Thread John Blossom
as admins, I don't think there > should > > be a problem. > > > > Could you first put together a page of guidelines on the wiki? (Like > > CloudStack has: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/social-media-guidelines.html) > > > > Ali > > On 31 Jul 20

Re: Apache Wave Google+ Account

2013-07-31 Thread John Blossom
first put together a page of guidelines on the wiki? (Like > CloudStack has: > https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/social-media-guidelines.html) > > Ali > On 31 Jul 2013 19:26, "John Blossom" wrote: > > > In conjunction with the Hangouts, I'd like to suggest t

Re: Apache Wave Google+ Account

2013-07-31 Thread John Blossom
Social Media guidelines are up, I made a few minor tweaks to bring the Cloud Stack template up to date. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Apache+Wave+Social+Media+Guidelines On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:51 PM, John Blossom wrote: > Ali, > > Great suggestion on guideli

Re: Apache Wave Google+ Account

2013-07-31 Thread John Blossom
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:04 PM, John Blossom wrote: > > Social Media guidelines are up, I made a few minor tweaks to bring the > > Cloud Stack template up to date. > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.o

  1   2   >