Hi Chetan,
I think you’ll have to expand a bit on ‘sometimes’ for us to help. Under what
conditions does this happen?
/neale
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Date: Tuesday, 17 November 2020 at 07:40
To: vpp-dev
Subject: [vpp-dev] Facing issue Ipv6 routing (Vpp 1908)
Hello Everyone,
We are facing
Hi Neale,
Thanks for your response!
Note - This issue is not reproduced in labs but coming in one of our
deployment sites.
Let me explain the issue -
Client <> SUT(VPP 19.08 + our customized plugins)
<>Server
While sending icmpv6 (Echo Request) from client toward
Hi,
I have to run few benchmarks using *vpp as vswitch and vrouter* along with
DPDK but i am not finding proper steps on how to configure vpp as vswitch
and vrouter.
I have gone through few youtube links and other wiki links as below but no
luck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-ZRof2hDP0&feature
Hi All,
We are seeing a random crash in *VPP-19.08*. The crash is occurring in
memclnt_queue_callback
and it is in code that we are not using. Any pointers to fix the crash
would be helpful.
*Complete Call Stack:*
Thread 1 (Thread 0x7fe728f43d00 (LWP 189)):
#0 0x7fe728049492 in __GI___wait
Hi Lijian,
I looked at your patches and I’m quite concerned about this approach, as you
basically wrote completely different code path for the feature.
I don't see how we can maintain such code easily specially because today we
don't have ARM hardware which can run that code.
If we merge that c
From: on behalf of chetan bhasin
Date: Tuesday 17 November 2020 at 12:27
To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)"
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Facing issue Ipv6 routing (Vpp 1908)
Hi Neale,
Thanks for your response!
Note - This issue is not reproduced in labs but coming in one of our deployment
Hi All,
Can any one share the sample of sshd_config file? or what things needs to be
done in order to enable sshd on VPP.?
i am following below link,
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/HostStack/LDP/sshd
but from the server i am getting the RST while 3 way handshaking.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Nikhi
Hello all,
I'm currently improving some stuff for the IOAM implementation, for example,
I'm trying to add the possibility to put the Hop-by-Hop extension header
containing IOAM data inside a newly created packet instead of inserting it
directly to the existing packet (i.e doing IPv6 in IPv6 enc
Let’s be clear: you’re seeing a crash in a modified fork of vpp-19.08. I’ve
never seen such a crash myself, nor has one such been reported by anyone else
to my knowledge.
That having been written, all signs point to the volatile int ** vector
vl_api_queue_cursizes having had an accident:
Hi Nikhil,
Just use a default sshd_config file and change the 3 lines mentioned in the
wiki. Note that this has been tested only with “through the stack” tcp
connections, i.e., server running on top of vpp on one host and the client
(running on linux, not using vpp) on a different host.
You
Thanks Dave, will check it out.
-Rajith
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 8:40 PM wrote:
> Let’s be clear: you’re seeing a crash in a *modified fork* of vpp-19.08.
> I’ve never seen such a crash myself, nor has one such been reported by
> anyone else to my knowledge.
>
>
>
> That having been written, all
Hi Klement,
> I see no reason why this shouldn’t be configurable.
> [...]
> Would you like to submit a patch?
Sure, I'll give that a try, adding it as a config option of the same
kind as other NAT options.
Best regards,
Elias
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this
> Could anyone suggest anything else to check
You can try to trace you process to see what is going on, eg.
~# strace -f ./a.out
> we had few issues with vpp
> api/vcl libraries and have not decided to pursue vpp - api for now, so
> vppctl is the only option.
Can you share what prevents you from
Is vppctl in the system path? Otherwise fully specify the path to the vppctl
binary in those system calls.
Chris.
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Aniket Pugaonkar
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 12:41
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [vpp-dev] vppctl fails from within the appl
> You can try the following steps:
> 1.make VPP_EXTRA_CMAKE_ARGS=-DVPP_ENABLE_SANITIZE_ADDR=ON build
> 2.make run
> 3.session enable
Thanks, can you check if https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/29969 fix your issue?
Best
ben
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to
I think that generating the python code makes the most sense. The body of
the code can still defer to the dynamically generated object, since it's
not available until runtime anyway, but the user no longer has to resort to
using lambdas because of the deferred bindings.
I imagined it would work l
Folks,
There is an issue with CI jobs being marked as UNSTABLE due to the
failure to upload log files to nexus.fd.io. This is causing the CI job
pipeline to be stalled due to checkstyle job not succeeding.
I have opened a case with LF-IT:
https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/the
Ok. This is a backwards request. I'm asking for help trying to explain
properly why I've -2'd a change. The code is both useful to the community
and cleanly written. I think the plumbing needs some help. When we find
someone who is willing and able to contribute, I'd like to not frustrate
them
Dave W. and I were chatting about putting together a collection of agreed
upon improvements for the test infrastructure.
If people want to respond to this thread or email me, I will start a .rst
that we can maintain in the repo.
I want to start the thread off with my disagreement with previous co
sorry, forgot to reply-all
Hi Ben,
When i use the same command in sample test application (just int main()..)
they work fine. but when I add them in my multithreaded application, it
does not work. Please see below Strace output of the application. even
fully specifying path to vppctl and cli.s
Paul, is it 2400 comparisons per single test or 2400 comparisons in total ?
If the latter, I would rather optimize for readability, since it’s probably
less than a second of run time.
Specifically about the example with debugging of internals - replacing the
hooks with subclassing hinders the i
Paul,
I have pushed an update reducing the number of conditional tests to 1. Runs in
O(1) constant time.
Going forward, can you at least do a small favor and provide some clear code
review feedback rather than something like the below?
“A RunningVPPTestCase or similar should be subclassed from V
On this line in the trace:
[pid 2536742] socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 0
It says it’s returning file descriptor 0 for the socket. Similarly other file
opens and subsequent closes are using descriptor 0. 0 is normally stdin. Are
stdin & out closed? That could cause all kinds of strange issue
Hi ben:
The issue still exist with patch https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/29969 (
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/29969 )
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#18073): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/18073
Mute This Topic: https://lists
Thanks Naveen.
That's what I'm looking for. Did you see the comment with the posted code
example?: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/29938? I posted it so you could
see it, then had to go back and get it to pass the gate so anyone could see
that it doesn't impact the current framework.
On Tue, N
reposting to the list.
2400 for each 'make test' run.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:27 PM Paul Vinciguerra <
pvi...@vinciconsulting.com> wrote:
> 2400 for each 'make test' run.
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:48 PM Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko
> wrote:
>
>> Paul, is it 2400 comparisons per single test or 24
> On 18 Nov 2020, at 04:35, Paul Vinciguerra wrote:
>
>
> reposting to the list.
>
> 2400 for each 'make test' run.
Yeah so then it probably would make less than a second of run time - in this
case I would squarely optimize for a better readability by the unsuspecting
person later on.
Ar
Also, specifically for 29938: I tested it and it appears to break the
TEST_DEBUG usage.
So in my view it strengthens the case for having the
non-performance-critical code that is the obvious to read and modify.
--a
On 11/18/20, Andrew Yourtchenko via lists.fd.io
wrote:
>
>
>> On 18 Nov 2020, at
28 matches
Mail list logo
