pp.log
cli-listen /run/vpp/cli.sock
gid vpp
#exec /etc/ipsec-setup.txt
}
cpu {
main-core 2
}
dpdk {
dev default {
num-rx-desc 512
num-tx-desc 512
}
socket-mem 1024
dev :00:04.0
uio-driver uio_pci_generic
}
logging {
default-log-level debug
default-syslog-log-level
}
*/
/*test_messages();*/
test_punt_socket_register_message();
exit (0);
}
*Compilation Options used*
gcc vpp_api_client_vac_layer.c -o vpp_api_client_vac_layer.o -lpthread
-lvlibmemoryclient -lvppinfra -lvppapiclient -I/usr/include/
*Output*
[root@8f57181df3a1 vpp_c_api_examples]# ./vpp_api_c
Thanks, my mistake, it worked...
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 13:34, Stanislav Zaikin wrote:
> You need to uncomment clib_mem_init
>
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 10:01, Venumadhav Josyula
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ole,
>>
>> So instead of the code below, I tried the code from
t; 20);
> >
> >if (vl_client_api_map("/vpe-api"))
> >{
> > printf("unable to map\n");
> > goto quit;
> >}
> >if (vl_client_connect("vpp-test-app", 0, 32) < 0)
> >{
> > printf
at 21:14, wrote:
> Venu,
>
> Doesn't seem like you are using the higher level C VAPI API nor the
> low-level API in vpp-api/client.c.
> Are you sure this is what you want?
>
> O.
>
> > On 30 Sep 2021, at 16:09, Venumadhav Josyula wrote:
> >
> > H
h of your VPP /include directory and /library path in
> the compilation.
>
>
> /Akash
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021, 19:39 Venumadhav Josyula wrote:
>
>> Hi Akash,
>>
>> Thansks, now after devtoolset,
>>
>> @Benoit Ganne (bganne) , @Ole Troa
u
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 19:00, Akash S R wrote:
> Hey Venu,
>
> Try "scl enable devtoolset-9 bash" inside your docker or update your gcc
> version.
>
>
> /Akash S R
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021, 18:54 Venumadhav Josyula wrote:
>
>> Hi Benoit,
>>
>&g
c-9).
How do I use it ?
Thanks,
Regards,
Venu
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 18:47, Benoit Ganne (bganne)
wrote:
> You should upgrade your compiler... GCC-4 is way too old.
> Eg. use devtoolset-9 (gcc-9).
>
> Best
> ben
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: vpp-dev@lis
Hi Ole / Others,
Thanks for your email, i getting following compilation error
[root@8f57181df3a1 vpp_c_api_examples]#* gcc vpp_api_client_test3.c -o
vpp_api_client_test3.o -lvlibmemoryclient -lsvm -lvppinfra -lvlib*
In file included from /usr/include/vppinfra/error.h:41:0,
from /u
Hi Ole,
Any examples for VAPI shared to use binary APIs ?
Thanks,
Regards,
Venu
On Thu, 23 Sept 2021 at 00:26, Ole Troan wrote:
> Ravi,
>
> The VPP binary API supports two transports. Shared memory and unix domain
> sockets.
> VAPI is the C language binding for the binary API. I think it only
Hi All,
i) want to use C APIs.
ii) want to have vpp-client proxy which forward API messages to the VPP
iii) towards VPP is the binary APIs , intent is use vac_connect,
iv) VPP + this application will run in a pod.
v) south another would send those APIs recieved by fastpath pod and send it
to VPP.
Hi Mohsen,
We recently tested , we are good throughput for gtp-u ( non-ipsec ) case.
We had link limitation of 10 Gbps... We were doing Line rate for single cpu
and single gtp-u tunnel.
Can you configuration details ? Also
show hardware-interfaces
and startup.conf
Thanks
Regards
Vemu
On Thu, Se
Hi All,
Does the govpp have a Cloud native VNF agent also ? I was looking at the
slides on govpp, those are back from 2017
Is the Cloud native VNF agent also open sourced ?
Please note we do not want to use VPP-Ligato agent for cloud-native
platforms for our CU work. We are responsible
Hi Mohammed / Dave,
How would you measure the latency of packet ? for e.g clocks &
vector/call for each node, can we measure it ?
Thanks,
Regards,
Venu
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 16:54, Mohammed Hawari wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Evaluating packet processing time in software is a very challenging iss
{
* buffers-per-numa 128000*
}
Thanks,
Regards,
Venu
On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 14:25, Venumadhav Josyula via lists.fd.io wrote:
> Thanks , neale let me try this
>
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 13:21, Neale Ranns wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi Venu,
>>
>>
>>
>
t;
> /neale
>
>
>
> *From: *vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Venumadhav
> Josyula via lists.fd.io
> *Date: *Tuesday, 17 August 2021 at 08:30
> *To: *Sweetu Hubby
> *Cc: *vpp-dev
> *Subject: *Re: [vpp-dev] using dpdk backend with vpp 20.09 using
> stable/2
Hi *Sergio,*
*Any help would be really appreciated.*
*Thanks,*
*Regards,*
*Venu*
On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 11:21, Venumadhav Josyula via lists.fd.io wrote:
> Hi All,
> Please note we have build vpp from stable/2009 branch, following is
> startup.conf
> unix {
> # nodaemon
>
Hi All,
Please note we have build vpp from stable/2009 branch, following is
startup.conf
unix {
# nodaemon
log /var/log/vpp/vpp.log
full-coredump
cli-listen /run/vpp/cli.sock
gid vpp
exec /etc/vpp/setup.conf
}
api-trace {
on
}
api-segment {
gid vpp
}
socksvr {
default
}
cpu {
mai
h
> that call without decapsulated .Mostly a goto variable would do the job
> with some if checks.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Akash
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021, 8:34 PM Venumadhav Josyula
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Akash,
>>
>> >
at 21:37, Andreas Schultz <
andreas.schu...@travelping.com> wrote:
>
>
> Am Fr., 16. Juli 2021 um 17:04 Uhr schrieb Venumadhav Josyula <
> vjosy...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Akash,
>>
>> >From your requirement , keeping vpp support in mind, you shall send th
gt; picture in this . Anyways, if you need to mark the packet with the correct
> teid, tteid and make the packet as type GTPU then you shall fire an IP
> packet to the Tunnel so that it is encapsulated and fired out of interface.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Regards,
> Akash
>
ds,
> Akash
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021, 2:42 PM Venumadhav Josyula
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Akash,
>>
>> While creating tunnels there if I set decap-next gtpu4-encap will it not
>> work, it use the tried for the same right ?
>> create gtpu tunnel src 10.21.58.142 ds
s way.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Akash S R
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021, 2:03 PM Venumadhav Josyula
> wrote:
>
>> Hi vpp gtpu experts,
>>
>> We have requirement where
>>
>>- we create gtpu tunnel
>>- Now, we will hit gtpu input, where w
Hi vpp gtpu experts,
We have requirement where
- we create gtpu tunnel
- Now, we will hit gtpu input, where we will receive gtpu packet and
when we send it out on the interface replace the tied with tried and
massage the ip address of src and destination and send the packet out
vpp#
ale
>
>
>
> *From: *vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Benoit
> Ganne (bganne) via lists.fd.io
> *Date: *Thursday, 8 July 2021 at 15:08
> *To: *Venumadhav Josyula
> *Cc: *vpp-dev
> *Subject: *Re: [vpp-dev] having problem pinging gtpu_tunnel0 interface,
> says Failed: no so
master
* stable/2106
[root@hng4 vpp]#
Thanks,
Regards,
Venu
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 at 17:33, Venumadhav Josyula via lists.fd.io wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> Small correction vpp2 interface ip is should read as 10.21.58.140/16
> <http://10.21.58.142/16> I had those correct ip
&g
Hi Benoit,
Small correction vpp2 interface ip is should read as 10.21.58.140/16
<http://10.21.58.142/16> I had those correct ip
Though the problem is not solved.
Thanks,
Regards,
Venu
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 at 17:27, Venumadhav Josyula via lists.fd.io wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
>
>
iginal Message-
> > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Venumadhav
> > Josyula
> > Sent: jeudi 8 juillet 2021 12:19
> > To: vpp-dev
> > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] having problem pinging gtpu_tunnel0 interface,
> says
> > Failed: no source address for
vpp experts any comments / suggestions on the below ?
On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 at 11:30, Venumadhav Josyula via lists.fd.io wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I facing problem to ping over gtpu tunnel interface
>
> *vpp1 on separate vm*
> set interface state GigabitEthernet0/4/0 up
> set
Hi All,
I facing problem to ping over gtpu tunnel interface
*vpp1 on separate vm*
set interface state GigabitEthernet0/4/0 up
set interface ip address GigabitEthernet0/4/0 10.21.58.142/16
create gtpu tunnel src 10.21.58.142 dst 10.21.58.140 teid 13 tteid 14
encap-vrf-id 0 decap-next ip4
set in s
Hi All,
Vpp1 ( docker )
---
vpp# show interface
Name IdxState MTU (L3/IP4/IP6/MPLS)
Counter Count
GigabitEthernet0/4/0 1 down 9000/0/0/0
gtpu_tunnel0 4 up 0/0/0/0
host-vpp2out
:
>
> Venumadhav Josyula writes:
>
> > Hi Damien,
> >
> >>I’m asking because in vpp we have also native
> >> drivers for some NICs and paravirtualized >devices, and those
> >> drivers are working in the >non-priv mode.
>
> > You m
tualized devices, and those drivers are working in the non-priv mode.
>
> —
> Damjan
>
> On 18.06.2021., at 09:12, Venumadhav Josyula wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Damjan,
>
> We need dpdk, the reason being that packets from the NICs ( pollmode )
> need to come inside our
wrote:
>
>
> Why do you need dpdk?
>
> —
> Damjan
>
> On 18.06.2021., at 06:47, Venumadhav Josyula wrote:
>
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> Can you please share the exact steps please ?
>
> Thanks,
> Regards,
> Venu
>
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 2
Hi Christian,
Can you please share the exact steps please ?
Thanks,
Regards,
Venu
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 21:25, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> "Venumadhav Josyula" writes:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Can you run vpp + dpdk in non-privileged mode ? This vpp runn
Hi All,
Can you run vpp + dpdk in non-privileged mode ? This vpp running inside pod
as a cnf
Thanks,
Regards,
Venu
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#19567): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/19567
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Venumadhav
> > Josyula
> > Sent: lundi 19 avril 2021 13:17
> > To: vpp-dev
> > Subject: [vpp-dev] route based on the source ip
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have a requirement such that
> > i) we want to have a vrf table fo
Hi,
We have a requirement such that
i) we want to have a vrf table for each vlan interface. Each vrf will have
it own default route
ii)for packets from the host interface , we want to have a route based on
the source ip such we can redirect to use vrf table as next hop table.
iii) We are using str
enu
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 13:18, Stanislav Zaikin wrote:
> Hi Venumadhav,
>
> You should specify an ip table for the nexthop with "next-hop-table XX".
> By default it'd be nexthop in default fib.
>
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 10:40, Venumadhav Josyula
> wrote:
&g
1 uRPF:29 to:[0:0]][0]
[@0]: dpo-drop ip4 *
Thanks,
Regards,
Venu
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 13:10, Venumadhav Josyula via lists.fd.io wrote:
> Hi All,
> For VRF configuration does not seem to work for us, we using vpp-20.09.
> vpp# show version
> vpp v20.09.0-1~0-g94f29f6 built
Hi All,
For VRF configuration does not seem to work for us, we using vpp-20.09.
vpp# show version
vpp v20.09.0-1~0-g94f29f6 built by root on devdocker2.parallelwireless.net
at 2021-04-05T21:52:02
vpp#
We are trying to following configuration
ip table add 100
set interface ip table vpp-intf19/0/1
Hi Benoit,
Sorry to poke in the middle
> - VLANs arrive on different sub-interfaces
> - each sub-interface is in a different VRF
> - each VRF has its own tunnel with a default route going through it
We would need something of this sort, can you provide example for the same
in vpp ?
Than
small correction , strongswan call *expire* not migrate
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 at 15:07, Venumadhav Josyula via lists.fd.io wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> Strongswan keeps track for whatever is required but kernel feeds the
> relevant information via events.
>
> For *child sa*, in the k
Also, VPP comes with its own IKEv2 implementation (which does support
> lifetime management), you can find examples here:
> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/31414
>
> Best
> ben
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Venumadhav
> &
Hi Vpp Ipsec Experts,
I wanted to understand how child sa rekey ( lifetime) are handled in vpp.
i) We are using strongswan + kernel-vpp plugin for our ikev2 exchange.
ii) Now we are facing the issue child sa rekey, the problem child sa rekey
is not getting triggered. I understand, the strongswa
Hi Chetan,
That ability is already there right now also we are using vpp 20.09 and
intend to go 21.x also, we do it this way
...
dpdk {
dev :19:00.1 {
name vpp-intf19/0/1 <--- "you can give whatever you , we have
chose bus, slot,fn appended with vpp-intf"
}
..
}
We doing th
at 20:52, Florin Coras wrote:
> Hi Venu,
>
> We don’t support raw sockets in the host stack and implicitly in vcl. You
> might be able to achieve what you want with memif interfaces.
>
> Regards,
> Florin
>
> On Dec 22, 2020, at 12:43 AM, Venumadhav Josyula
> wrote
Dec 2020 at 03:54, Florin Coras wrote:
> Hi Venu,
>
> Inline.
>
> On Dec 27, 2020, at 8:17 AM, Venumadhav Josyula
> wrote:
>
> Hi Florin,
>
> Thanks, that helped. Now I have question, please
> vpp# show session verbose proto tcp
> [0:1][T] 0.0.0.0:1234->0
n
>
> [1] https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/HostStack/VCL
> [2]
> https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/HostStack/SessionLayerArchitecture#Session_Layer_Startup_Configuration
>
> On Dec 24, 2020, at 4:35 AM, Venumadhav Josyula
> wrote:
>
> Hi
> Setup details :-
> Two dockers created using following c
Hi
Setup details :-
Two dockers created using following commands
*vpp docker *
*creation :-*
docker run --privileged -it -d -v /var/run:/var/run -v /dev:/dev -v
/dev/shm:/dev/shm --cap-add=CAP_SYS_ADMIN --cap-add=CAP_NET_ADMIN --name
vpp-run-c1 vpp-run:1.0 /usr/sbin/init
*VPP Libraries installed*
Pointers will also help.
On Tue, 22 Dec, 2020, 9:17 pm Florin Coras, wrote:
> Hi Venu,
>
> The only resource I know of is [1]. Others might have more pointers.
>
> Regards,
> Florin
>
> [1] https://git.fd.io/vpp/tree/extras/libmemif
>
> On Dec 22, 2020, at 7:36 A
Regards,
> Florin
>
> On Dec 22, 2020, at 12:43 AM, Venumadhav Josyula
> wrote:
>
> Hi All.
>
> There is any raw socket like support in vpp. Our stack opens raw sockets
> and as out stack is sitting in the stack. We would like to pass the
> ethernet data direc
Hi All.
There is any raw socket like support in vpp. Our stack opens raw sockets
and as out stack is sitting in the stack. We would like to pass the
ethernet data directly via session layer to the application. We are
planning to use vcl to achieve the same.
Any pointers of examples are good to kn
Also does either are independent or require vpp host stack ?
Thanks and regards
Venu
On Tue, 8 Dec, 2020, 9:13 pm Venumadhav Josyula, wrote:
> Hi Florin,
>
> What's difference between ldp and direct vcl ? I mean in terms of use
> cases
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Venu
PRELOAD) shim and eventually through vcl.
> vcl_test_client and vcl_test_server are the tests that use vcl directly.
>
> Regards,
> Florin
>
> On Dec 8, 2020, at 2:11 AM, Venumadhav Josyula wrote:
>
> Hi Florin,
>
> The below are vcl based, my understanding it is based nor
ere [3] the vcl test client/server apps.
>
> Regards,
> Florin
>
> [1] https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/HostStack
> [2] https://wiki.fd.io/images/9/9c/Vpp-hoststack-kc-eu19.pdf
> [3] https://git.fd.io/vpp/tree/src/plugins/hs_apps/vcl
>
>
> On Dec 7, 2020, at 11:24 AM, Venumad
Hi Florin,
This is nothing to do with the subject being discussed.
Can you please direct me to the following
i) example(s) of VCL ?
ii) Any tutorial explaining the working of VCL ?
Thanks & Regards,
Venu
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 01:28, Florin Coras wrote:
> Hi Ravi,
>
> VCL is not part of the vp
57 matches
Mail list logo
