Hello again,
maybe that misconception should be changed. how many times has there been a
person who ask a questioned that has been asked countless times before only
to be referred to the documentation? by doing this, we assume that the
end-user asking the question is knowledgeable on vnc's inte
Re: Contributing to documentation
We've been thinking about setting up a Wiki for both VNC and OmniORB
(see http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki). I'll try to do this sooner rather
than later!
Aideen
-
To unsubscribe, send a message with
se
Sent: 03 May 2001 08:47
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: VNC review from TECHTV
Hey, If my old pointy haired manager could work out how to use VNC, it can't
be that hard!
-Original Message-
From: Schonborg, Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 May 2001 22:56
Hey, If my old pointy haired manager could work out how to use VNC, it can't
be that hard!
-Original Message-
From: Schonborg, Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 May 2001 22:56
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: VNC review from TECHTV
I have not trouble w
rk on some docs for using VNC with Win9x and WinNT for JoeUser (ie -
my wife or my in-laws).
-ME
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Harmen van der
Wal
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 9:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VNC review f
Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
> ><...>
> > If there is sufficient
> >interest I would be willing to create a "VNC for Dummies and Windows
> >Weenies" document. Please let me know if this would be worth while. If I
> >don't hear from the group, I won't spend the time re-writing documents for
> >the les
Jonathan Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I think that would be a good idea. However, how do we bring it to their
>(the weenies') attention?
I think that to have any hope of them reading these new (weenie) docs, they
have to be placed on the AT&T site, since this is where they are most likely
>I have not trouble with the current documentation. Frankly I would rather
>see too much information and technical jargon than not enough. I guess I
>should be flattered. According to the article I must be a computer guru. I
>fancy myself pretty good at dosumenting things. If there is sufficient
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VNC review from TECHTV
Had the reviewer (and I) had to pay $99.95 for VNC, then I would agree that
the documentation should be more end-user oriented and also would expect
that it would come on a CD in a colorful, oversized, shrink wrapped box..
However, we did not
the
VNC developers that VNC is targeted at computer novices, I see no problem
with the current technical documentation.
Angus.
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Erdely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 2:13 PM
Subject: RE:
IMO, this article misses that point that many people on this list have
missed in the past:
The developers of VNC did not intend to make a "product" to compete with
pcAnywhere and the like. They had an internal need, thought it might be
useful to others and offered it for free.
If people are look
11 matches
Mail list logo
