Good morning,
The 5.5 branch is working in FHS compliance, and it's a bit complex
because
so much of vpopmail has been built on /home/vpopmail. Normally vpopmail
looks for an existing tcp.smtp file and then favors that over it's desired
/home/vpopmail/etc location. Adding the FHS favoring in
nfigure script uses existing autoconf tool calls for determining
if the development files for MySQL are existing, it wouldn't make sense to
modify
this. The test is testing if it can link to MySQL at standard locations. If
you
don't have the development files, it matters little whether
domain quota's in 5.4.28?
is it on or off by default, and if on, how can it be controlled?
Last question: Is there any major change that could break an existing 5.4.25
installation? I'm considering to upgrade a production server to 5.4.28 status
in order to test the usage daemon, the
I'll checkout the SVN and enable the backends compilation again.
Digesting config.log I think I some found possible missing files...
Thanks Matt.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Matt Brookings wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> aledr wrote:
>> Here it is! Do not worry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
aledr wrote:
> Here it is! Do not worry about the RPM errors at the end, I need to
> fix It on my spec file.
You will need to also package in the vusage daemon. It's basically a
requirement
for the 5.5 tree. It's just not required when building vpo
.0/backends/mysql'
>> /usr/bin/install -c vmysql.so
>> /var/tmp/vpopmail-5.5.0-build/usr/lib64/vmysql.so
>> rm -f /var/tmp/vpopmail-5.5.0-build/etc/vpopmail/vpopmail.authmodule
>> ln -s /var/tmp/vpopmail-5.5.0-build/usr/lib64/vmysql.so
>> /var/tmp/vpopmail-5.5.
.5.0-build/usr/lib64/vmysql.so
> rm -f /var/tmp/vpopmail-5.5.0-build/etc/vpopmail/vpopmail.authmodule
> ln -s /var/tmp/vpopmail-5.5.0-build/usr/lib64/vmysql.so
> /var/tmp/vpopmail-5.5.0-build/etc/vpopmail/vpopmail.authmodule
> if ! test -r /var/tmp/vpopmail-5.5.0-build/etc/vpopmail/vpopmail
og config.status Makefile autom4te.cache
>> contrib/rc.vusaged
>>
>> install: $(BINS)
>> - $(INSTALL) -s -m 0700 vusaged $(DESTDIR)$(VPOPMAIL_DIR_BIN)
>> if test ! -r $(DESTDIR)$(VPOPMAIL_DIR_ETC)/vusaged.conf; then
>> $(INSTALL)
gt; - $(INSTALL) -s -m 0700 vusaged $(DESTDIR)$(VPOPMAIL_DIR_BIN)
> if test ! -r $(DESTDIR)$(VPOPMAIL_DIR_ETC)/vusaged.conf; then
> $(INSTALL) -m 0600 etc/vusaged.conf
> $(DESTDIR)$(VPOPMAIL_DIR_ETC)/vusaged.conf; fi
> --- 58,62
> rm -rf config.log config.sta
Patch reject on latest on r879:
> cat Makefile.in.rej
***
*** 58,62
rm -rf config.log config.status Makefile autom4te.cache
contrib/rc.vusaged
install: $(BINS)
- $(INSTALL) -s -m 0700 vusaged $(DESTDIR)$(VPOPMAIL_DIR_BIN)
if test ! -r $(DEST
Thanks Matt, I'll test it in minutes...
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Okay, here's a patch that does the following:
>
> Only chown if root
> Only mkdir if root or DESTDIR is set
&g
stall-strip: install
-install: $(BUILD_ALL)
+pre-install:
@echo
+ @echo "Checking installation pre-requisites..."
+ @echo
+
+ @if test -z "$(IDCOMMAND)"; then \
+ echo; \
+ echo "Cannot determine your uid because IDCOMMAND is not set."; \
+ echo; \
+ fi
+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Test
- --
/*
Matt Brookings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG Key 0x88999334
Software developer Systems technician
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
--
Oliver A. Rojo
__
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify t
i'm sorry, please ignore this. this is a small test. was having
difficulty sending mail here for some reason. if it ended up here, then
i fixed it but this was the only way to test. please excuse.
-SG
OK, so I'm not the only one that noticed the day-long lag, eh?
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Positive Negative wrote:
--
AIM: FucPsSht
--
AIM: FucPsSht
I don't have a copy, and don't have time to test right now, but is the
> rejection based on the score, or the Yes/No?
>
> Currently, I'm sending anything over 15 to /dev/null via a maildrop
> script, but 5 is marked as spam..
>
> Rick
>
> On Jul 31, 2004, at
Hello Rick,
Rick romero wrote on Sat, 31 Jul 2004 19:52:43 -0500 UTC:
Rr> I don't have a copy, and don't have time to test right now, but is the
Rr> rejection based on the score, or the Yes/No?
Rr> Currently, I'm sending anything over 15 to /dev/null via a maildrop
Rr&
I don't have a copy, and don't have time to test right now, but is the
rejection based on the score, or the Yes/No?
Currently, I'm sending anything over 15 to /dev/null via a maildrop
script, but 5 is marked as spam..
Rick
On Jul 31, 2004, at 6:40 PM, Ken Jones wrote:
Sure, s
py Ken.
> > >
> > >
> > > cheers
> > >
> > > Shane
> > >
> > > >-Original Message-
> > > >From: Ken Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >Sent: Wednesday, 28 July 2004 1:57 AM
> > > >To: [EMAIL
>
>
> cheers
>
> Shane
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Ken Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, 28 July 2004 1:57 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: [vchkpw] simscan test release: simplified scanner for
> >clamav/s
> Also I was wondering if there is a way to tell qmail-smtpd to exit
> with a 5xx error code rather than a 4xx error on spam or a virus?
> I am running qmail out of supervise, not that it should make any
> difference that I can see.
Look at the end of qmail.c in the qmail distribution.
The exit co
TECTED]
>Sent: Friday, 30 July 2004 1:44 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [vchkpw] simscan test release: simplified scanner
>for clamav/spamassassin
>
>Here you go
>
>Ken
>
>The installation instructions are in the INSTALL file
>
>
>On Thursday 29 July
On Thursday 29 July 2004 12:31 pm, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> ItÂs a good ideia to put simscan on a web-page or an FTP server.
I will, there is a bit of extra coordination on our web site since we
changed to a new php template.
> when i have a FREE-TIME I am Write an how to INSTALL simscan in
It´s a good ideia to put simscan on a web-page or
an FTP server.
when i have a FREE-TIME I am Write an how to
INSTALL simscan in portuguese
Language.
Itamar Reis PeixotoAnalista
ConsultorTreyNet Consultoria - UberlândiaTel : + 55 34 3231
0598Cel: +55 38 9107 1250http://www.treynet.com
Please send me a copy Ken.
cheers
Shane
>-Original Message-
>From: Ken Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, 28 July 2004 1:57 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [vchkpw] simscan test release: simplified scanner for
>clamav/spamassassin
>
&g
Ken Jones schrieb:
Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
It is a simplified replacement for qscanq.
We have been running it on our server for over a week and it is solid.
Like qscanq it can call clamdscan to check for viri.
It is invoked via the QMAILQUEUE patch.
Differences:
Pe data de Tuesday 27 July 2004 20:57, Ken Jones a scris:
> Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
> It is a simplified replacement for qscanq.
> We have been running it on our server for over a week and it is solid.
> Like qscanq it can call clamdscan to check for viri.
> It is i
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:57:20 -0500, Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
Can you send it to me ? I will love to try it.
--
Regards Manny
"Unix is simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity."
- Dennis Ritchie
pelase send for me.
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 2:57 PM
Subject: [vchkpw] simscan test release: simplified scanner for
clamav/spamassassin
Anyone interested in trying simscan befo
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
Yes, definitely interested!
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
If you are interested, please email me directly and I'll send you a tar ball.
Absolutely. I'd love to test it on our test mail machine. :)
Thanks in advance!
Chris Kalin
Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
It is a simplified replacement for qscanq.
We have been running it on our server for over a week and it is solid.
Like qscanq it can call clamdscan to check for viri.
It is invoked via the QMAILQUEUE patch.
Differences:
- uses configure
test
ping
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 20:18, Ken Jones wrote:
> > One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption?
> > I'm sure there's going to be some people running the client on a box
> > seperate from the server. You looking at adding ssl support, or are you
> > thinking of just lettin
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Rick Widmer wrote:
> There is no need to send the ~vpopmail/domains/ part of the path,
> because the user has no choice on that part. If we always send the full
> path from that point down, then the path is always:
>
>"$Domain/$User/$whatever"
>
> or maybe
>
>"/$Domain
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
Either I am missing something or... If we use full path then same operations
would look like:
Sys Admin would send same as
The Domain admin would send same as
And the user would send:
write_file /path/to/vpopmail/home/domains/test.com/user/VacationMessage
And thi
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Widmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier
> >
> >>from the client program's point of view?
> >
>
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier
from the client program's point of view?
a) full paths
b) relative based on user or command
+1 for b) First, it would be a bit like chr
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Monday 05 April 2004 8:08 pm, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
> > > I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
> > > is using a POP3 type protocol.
> >
> > Sounds good to me, this is
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I think it works pretty nicely. A single "." on a line by itself
>represents End of File when sending or receiving multiple
>lines of infomation.
Nice idea.
[cut]
>Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be eas
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Ken
Sure, shoot me a copy this way :)
X-Istence
Ken Jones wrote:
Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier
from the client program's point of view?
a) full paths
b) relative based on user or command
As long as you tell me where ~vpopmail is when I login, always using
fully qualified paths will be easiest, I think. That
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
> > One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption?
> > I'm sure there's going to be some people running the client on a box
> > seperate from the server. You looking at adding ssl support, or are you
> > thinking of just letting somethi
Rick Macdougall wrote:
I'm of the thought that it should be
line of text
line of text
+OK
Or even skip the . and just finish with +OK #more text available here
That way every single response ends in +OK or -ERR
+1.
Note, I removed the . in the response list. It will be easier to just
look f
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
Sounds good to me, this is getting exciting!
One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption?
I'm sure there's going to be som
On Monday 05 April 2004 8:08 pm, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
> > I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
> > is using a POP3 type protocol.
>
> Sounds good to me, this is getting exciting!
>
> One little question... What are you thinking of as far as
Hi,
Ken Jones wrote:
So the mod_user function would take it's
options on additional lines, like:
moduser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no_smtp
quota 1234
.
And the server would reply back
+OK
or
-ERR XXX error message
I get this
list_dir /home/vpopmail/domains/nougen.com/naomi/Maildir/cur
+OK
.
On a user w
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
> I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
> is using a POP3 type protocol.
Sounds good to me, this is getting exciting!
One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption?
I'm sure there's going to be some people running the clie
On Monday 05 April 2004 7:36 pm, Rick Widmer wrote:
> Ken Jones wrote:
> > On Monday 05 April 2004 2:46 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
> >>[snip]
> >
> > I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
> > is using a POP3 type protocol.
>
> I like it very much so far!
>
> The way you put the user name and
Ken Jones wrote:
On Monday 05 April 2004 2:46 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
[snip]
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
I like it very much so far!
The way you put the user name and password on the same transaction is
even better than following pop3 exact
Ken Jones wrote:
On Monday 05 April 2004 4:05 pm, you wrote:
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Got it! It compiled and ran the first time. Good job Ken!
Am I correct that any user can be a System admin, if given
On Monday 05 April 2004 2:46 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
>[snip]
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
I think it works pretty nicely. A single "." on a line by itself
represents End of File when sending or receiving multiple
lines of infomation.
From the cli
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Here ya go.
> Look at README.vpopmaild
>
> Short test procedure:
> ./configure (your options)
> make
> ./vpopmaild
> login [EMAIL PROTECTED] user
> help
./configure with option PASS
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Yes, please.
Rick
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Yes please.
Regards,
Rick
> Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
> before it gets posted? It could use another
> set of eyes.
Show me the money :-)
Solt
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Ken
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
> Execute
>
> chown vpopmail.vchkpw /home/vpopmail/etc
>
> and test again. If this succeeds you /can/ further search for
> the cause of 'setuid' vchkpw is run as, or you can live with
> the fact you need 'write permissions for vpopmail
Hello Andrea,
On Thursday, January 15, 2004 at 5:28:30 PM you wrote (at least in
part):
> The etc directory is the problem, I think. Right?
Execute
chown vpopmail.vchkpw /home/vpopmail/etc
and test again. If this succeeds you /can/ further search for the
cause of 'setuid' vchkpw
> '/home/vpopmail/etc' permits UID 89 to create a new file)
> this already solves your problem.
I've deleted my open-smtp.lock, and I've tried to download emails from
pop3-ssl, but my ktrace says the same:
[...]
29540 vchkpw NAMI "/home/vpopmail/domains/nesys.it
Hello Andrea,
On Thursday, January 15, 2004 at 4:21:09 PM you wrote (at least in
part):
>> What we need is why 'vchkpw' fails to write 'open-smtp' (or
>> if it even tries to).
[...]
> 16072 vchkpw NAMI "/etc/malloc.conf"
> 16072 vchkpw RET readlink -1 errno 2 No such file or directory
Tom Collins wrote:
> Yep, delete the lock file.
ok
>
> Is /home/vpopmail/domains/nesys.it/test a valid directory?
> If not, why
> not? What are its permissions.
drwx-- 3 vpopmail vchkpw 512 Jan 14 11:36 test
It's right?
> In the vpopmail source directory,
uot;/home/vpopmail/domains/nesys.it/test"
16072 vchkpw RET chdir 0
16072 vchkpw CALL close(0x)
16072 vchkpw RET close -1 errno 9 Bad file descriptor
< another problem? >
Is /home/vpopmail/domains/nesys.it/test a valid directory? If not, why
not? What are its
82,0,0)
16072 vchkpw RET lseek 5506/0x1582
16072 vchkpw CALL read(0x3,0xcfbfd824,0x8)
16072 vchkpw GIO fd 3 read 8 bytes
"\^D\0\0\0Z\0\0\0"
16072 vchkpw RET read 8
16072 vchkpw CALL read(0x3,0xcfbfd7bc,0x4)
16072 vchkpw GIO fd 3 read 4 bytes
&quo
Hello Andrea,
On Thursday, January 15, 2004 at 1:20:50 AM you wrote (at least in
part):
> This is my test:
[ktrace call and results]
This ktrace dump does not contain content of vchkpw work. I'd suggest
you
- either find a way to tell ktrace to "follow", i.e. to observe a
Another test, with:
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 380 \ /usr/local/bin/sslserver -u 89 -g
89 -v -R -H -l 0 0 995 ktrace -f /tmp/ktrace.out /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
\ nesys.it /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 2>&1
Now I've resolved the .tmp files
This is my test:
The runscript
-
#!/bin/sh
CAFILE="/usr/local/ssl/certs/pop3s.cert"
CERTFILE="/usr/local/ssl/certs/pop3s.cert"
KEYFILE="/usr/local/ssl/certs/pop3s.key"
DHFILE="/usr/local/ssl/certs/dh1024.pem"
export CAFILE CERTFILE KEYFILE
vchkpw，您好！
test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2003-11-22
Sorry
Please
Delete
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I belive what you are seeing is reply from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Each time I send a message to
> this list, I get a reply from him/She ...
Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the culprit. There are many
different messages flying abut, not just this one.
If you to thi
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:14 PM
Subject: [vchkpw] RE: OFF LIST - Re: [vchkpw] Test, is this msg going out at
all?
> Hi Chris,
> I don't know what you mean but this virus warning.. but the errors I get
are
> not exactly errors
etting back to me
every time I send out a mail to these mailing lists?
Cheers,
Shai
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 9:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: OFF LIST - Re: [vchkpw] Test, is this msg going
Hi,
I get an error when I send out msgs to the mailing lists... but I wonder if
you guys knew what they mean. This is a test mail just to get the msg, and
then, if you even get this msg, I'll add the reply emails I get from a
server I know nothing about...
Shai
sorry but this test.
but tha last email dont send.
enzo.
test
Bill,
this a patch for vpopmail, which enables the storage of
clear passwords in LDAP. It is against vanilla vpopmail-5.3.12 and
is based on the work from koj ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
Fixes includes:
- clear password storage in LDAP operational
I send another patch you - and because I want to do so
test
On Friday, December 7, 2001, at 04:51 PM, Ron Guerin wrote:
> You missed it, but it's worth bringing up again, because this list is a
> spam-haven, and is rightly becoming RBLed because of it. The best way
> to get chatter about the spam from this list stopped is to stop the
> spam, not by endur
On Sun, 2001-12-02 at 06:36, Lou Hevly wrote:
> At 12:17 02/12/01, Tren Blackburn wrote:
> It's pretty simple:
>
> % ezmlm-make -+u DIR
>
> > If you want complete
> >details, search the archives, but this horse has been beaten to death
> >already.
>
> Sorry, then. I must have missed it.
You
At 23:14 03/12/01, Ken Jones wrote:
>I'm running ezmlm-idx under vpopmail 5.0 with the home dir of
>/home/vpopmail/domains/inter7.com
>
>What would be the ezmlm command line to change the vchkpw mailing list
>to only allow subscribers to post?
Assuming ezmlm-make is in your path:
(as root)
$ ezm
y Zink
> Cc: Lou Hevly; vpopmail
> Subject: Re: test spam; should be rejected
>
>
> I'm running ezmlm-idx under vpopmail 5.0 with the home dir of
> /home/vpopmail/domains/inter7.com
>
> What would be the ezmlm command line to change the vchkpw mailing list
> to only allo
I'm running ezmlm-idx under vpopmail 5.0 with the home dir of
/home/vpopmail/domains/inter7.com
What would be the ezmlm command line to change the vchkpw mailing list
to only allow subscribers to post?
Ken Jones
Admin of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2001-12-03 at 16:05, Harry Zink wrote:
> Just FY
Just FYI - but I just checked my 'spam' folder, and a bunch of the mails
that get dumped in there automatically *ARE* from this list, so it appears
this list (as you stated previously) gets hit by such spam as well.
Admin - please configure the list to be 'subscriber only can post' to stem
this t
At 12:17 02/12/01, Tren Blackburn wrote:
[ Commenting on my contention that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the only
ezmlm-run list that I get spam from ]
>I beg to differ about the sqwebmail list. I've gotten spam from it in
>the
>past. Also, this discussion has been done before. When inter7 setup
>t
ay, December 02, 2001 3:41 AM
> To: vpopmail
> Subject: Re: test spam; should be rejected
>
>
> No cc: please; I'm on the list.
>
> At 11:02 02/12/01, Harry (lists) wrote:
> >on 12/2/01 1:56 AM, Lou Hevly at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any
No cc: please; I'm on the list.
At 11:02 02/12/01, Harry (lists) wrote:
>on 12/2/01 1:56 AM, Lou Hevly at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason for allowing spammers to post to this list?
>
>Not sure about the vpopmail list, but this exact same argument just
>finished
>on the qmail
on 12/2/01 1:56 AM, Lou Hevly at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there any reason for allowing spammers to post to this list?
Not sure about the vpopmail list, but this exact same argument just finished
on the qmail list, which is also an open list - and thus spam friendly.
On the qmail list, the
At 10:48 02/12/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>This message should not make it to the list.
>--
My apologies for the test message, but now I know why I've been getting
so much spam on this list; surprisingly (to me) it is set up without
ezmlm's -u option:
-u User posts only.
This message should not make it to the list.
--
All the best (Adéu-siau),
Lou Hevly
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.visca.com
test
Greetings,
I received an email Sunday from an administrator
who had received a bounced spam message. Apparently, the sender is using
one of my IP addresses. The administrator gave the step-by-step on how he
verified the open relay. I then checked it myself. It indeed was
allowing unaut
Thursday March 01 2001 21:10, Ken Jones wrote to All:
KJ> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KJ> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KJ> test
B- :)
KS
test
s per box. :-)
Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: Sumith Ail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 7:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Torture test Vpopmail + Qmail
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have set up Qmail + tcpserver + vpopmail on our R
Hello,
I have set up Qmail + tcpserver + vpopmail on our RH
6.2 p3 box. We'd like to torture test it. Is there
anything more than sending bulk email from a group
mail software that we can do.
Please give me suggestions as to how can we we
continously hit the server with a lot of mails.
Re
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
