Sure, some other folks suggested the same option. Perhaps a configuration option to decide to reject or just process
Ken On Saturday 31 July 2004 03:03 pm, Bastiaan van der Put wrote: > Ken, > > Is it possible to scan for spam and use "tagging" only, not rejecting the > msg? > > Greetings, Bas > > At 19:43 7/29/2004, you wrote: > >Here you go > > > >Ken > > > >The installation instructions are in the INSTALL file > > > >On Thursday 29 July 2004 12:18 pm, Shane Chrisp wrote: > > > Please send me a copy Ken. > > > > > > > > > cheers > > > > > > Shane > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: Ken Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Sent: Wednesday, 28 July 2004 1:57 AM > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Subject: [vchkpw] simscan test release: simplified scanner for > > > >clamav/spamassassin > > > > > > > > > > > >Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it? > > > >It is a simplified replacement for qscanq. > > > >We have been running it on our server for over a week and it is solid. > > > >Like qscanq it can call clamdscan to check for viri. > > > >It is invoked via the QMAILQUEUE patch. > > > > > > > >Differences: > > > >- uses configure ; make ; make install-strip > > > >- automatically deletes working directories when done > > > >- uses one program instead of qscanq's two programs per email > > > >- optionally calls spamassassin to reject spam during smtp > > > >- optionally blocks list of attachments > > > >- does not require svscan > > > >- simplified C code (one simscan.c file) > > > > > > > >If you are interested, please email me directly and I'll send > > > >you a tar ball. > > > > > > > >-- > > > >Ken Jones > > > >inter7.com
